Banks engagement report
@Banks - 2.7M followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 237K times each, and 0.715% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 165K interactions, about 90x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Banks's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.063%, Banks sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.432% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 161.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- May 14, 201990x their median
Was just in a gas station and saw a little homie, maybe 13 years old looking around. Offered to buy him a pack of Pokemon cards and he looked up and said "nah, I'll take a pack of JUUL pods though." When I told him no he told me to fuck myself. These kids are outta control.
- Jul 20, 202623x their median
JUST IN: American Heart Association reveals drinking up to five cups of coffee per day may lower the risk of stroke, heart failure & type 2 diabetes.
- Nov 22, 202422x their median
🚨 NEW: Babe wake up! It’s happening again!! 😂 https://t.co/8DodxQasvE
- Apr 29, 202616x their median
The truth about FaZe. Find out what I'm doing next, tomorrow. https://t.co/ke5DnDyCbD
- Aug 19, 202613x their median
[LEAK] GTA 6 leaker says there’s a currency in the game that can be traded for real-life money. https://t.co/iatDzeAdej
- Aug 1, 20269.4x their median
Corinna Kopf attempts to make a move on David Dobrik before FaZe Banks jumps into bed with them FaZe Banks: "I don't give a f*ck whose birthday it is! Eiffel Tower?! We can go to Paris tonight!" David Dobrik: "Yeah get in here!" https://t.co/DGf0S3gR25
- Jul 30, 20269.1x their median
JUST IN: Growing number of job applicants are hiding prompt injections in their résumés — to trick AI screeners into ranking them as qualified candidates.
- Jul 30, 20267.7x their median
GIVING SOMEONE WHO LIKES THIS TWEET $1,000 IN THE NEXT 10 MINUTES! GO!
- Jul 16, 20265.2x their median
FaZe Banks says streaming is ruining World Cup games 😳 "the worst seats you can get are $10,000 and there's 2 kids behind you in full Haaland makeup cosplaying pro players, screaming, and clip farming" "you're in a seat paying thousands of dollars to be in and there's people streaming behind you, streaming your conversations"
- Jul 30, 20265.1x their median
Banks reveals FaZe Clan tried taking 10% of the streamers revenue which is what ultimately led to everyone leaving the organization. https://t.co/eUaXmrBCe1
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 237K times each, and 0.715% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 165K interactions, about 90x its own typical post.
- What is Banks's engagement rate on X?
- Banks (@Banks) has an engagement rate of 0.063%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,709,127 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.063%, Banks sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Banks have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Banks post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.