Back to @DonDurrett's profile

Don Durrett - goldstockdata.com engagement report

@DonDurrett - 95K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.352%
of 95K followers
Per impression
0.692%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
50.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
333
interactions (median)
Saved
0.096%
46 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.97/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.352%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.692% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 50.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 67x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Don Durrett - goldstockdata.com's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.352%, Don Durrett - goldstockdata.com sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202667x their median

    🔻 THE PHARMA REP WHO SAW THE LIST. "I sold cancer drugs for 11 years. I made $340,000 a year convincing doctors to prescribe treatments I knew didn't work. Then one night, I saw the list. And I understood everything." I was a senior sales representative for one of the top three pharmaceutical companies in the world. I won't name them yet. My lawyers are still working on my protection agreement under the Executive Order. My job was simple: visit oncologists, buy them dinners, take them to conferences, and make sure they prescribed our chemotherapy drugs over the competitors. I was good at it. Top 1% nationally for seven consecutive years. I never questioned it. The drugs had FDA approval. The doctors trusted me. The patients trusted them. The system worked — for everyone except the patients. In November 2024, I was at a private dinner in Manhattan with three executives from my company. We had closed a $1.2 billion hospital network contract. Champagne. Cigars. The usual. One of the executives left his phone on the table when he went to the bathroom. A notification popped up. It was an encrypted message. The preview read: "Updated K-List attached. 2,847 names added this quarter. Confirm receipt." I didn't touch the phone. But I remembered the term. K-List. Over the next three months, I quietly asked around. Most people had never heard of it. But one senior colleague — a man who had been with the company for 30 years — went pale when I mentioned it. He pulled me into a stairwell and said: "The K-List is the kill list. It's every patient whose insurance profile makes them more profitable dead than alive. Long-term treatment patients who are about to hit their coverage cap. If they die before the cap, the company collects the full treatment cycle payment. If they live past it, the insurance stops paying and we lose money." I said: "Are you telling me we let people die for billing optimization?" He said: "We don't let them die. We make sure the treatment doesn't work well enough to save them. The dosing protocols are calibrated. Not to kill. Just to not cure." I went home that night and threw up for an hour. 2,847 names added in one quarter. Four quarters a year. For how many years? The math is simple. And the math is murder. I resigned in January 2025. I took nothing with me except what I remembered. But when Executive Order 2026-1947 was signed, I contacted a lawyer. The NDA protections are dissolving. The whistleblower provisions are active. I am one of dozens preparing to testify. The pharmaceutical industry doesn't just suppress cures. It engineers death on a schedule. And every single executive knows it. The K-List is real. The names on it are real. And in 34 days, the world will see it. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵. 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. ⟁

    14K7.6K479533363K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202635x their median

    How TF is this allowed? And they are going to delete current records?! They are desperately hiding something….thats what this tells me. https://t.co/ZQSdybtntL

    8.1K2.8K511247320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202631x their median

    Stanley Druckenmiller renders an unfavorable opinion of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's use of buybacks to defend against higher yields in a market that is functioning normally. "I have spent five decades trading on a simple premise: Markets aggregate information no committee possesses, and prices are how that information reaches decision makers. The long-term Treasury yield is the most important price in the world. It is also the only fiscal disciplinarian the U.S. has left." "Every basis point of artificial yield suppression is a subsidy to procrastination." "Return buybacks to their stated purpose: small, scheduled, off-the-run liquidity operations announced at quarterly refundings, never off-cycle responses to yield levels. Term out the debt honestly and pay the price the market sets." "If the 30-year must trade at 5.5% to clear, that isn’t a crisis. It is an invoice. Then do the only thing that durably lowers long-term yields: address the primary deficit." https://t.co/Xe8Vi38WiI

    8.0K1.5K3504032.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202613x their median

    My neighbor paid off his house in 2021. He was 64, completely debt-free, and so happy about it that he threw a little party in the driveway. I brought the beer. Five years later, he doesn’t have a mortgage. No lender. No monthly house payment. But the house still costs him about $1,340 every month. His property taxes were $6,800 last year after the county reassessed the property. His insurance jumped to $7,200 after two rough storm seasons, even though he’s never filed a claim. Then there’s another $220 a month for the HOA. And none of that covers repairs or maintenance. He’s living on Social Security and a small pension. About $3,100 a month. So roughly 43% of his monthly income is going toward a house that’s completely paid off. He thought about selling and downsizing, but the smaller places around here aren’t much cheaper once you factor in closing costs and the higher taxes that can come with buying another property. So he’s stuck. He can’t comfortably afford to stay, but moving doesn’t really solve the problem either. That’s the part nobody tells you about paying off a mortgage. You make the final payment and think you’re finally done. You’re not. The mortgage disappears. The taxes, insurance, HOA fees, repairs and maintenance don’t. You can spend 30 years paying for the house, only to spend the next 30 paying everyone else to let you keep it.

    3.1K66360367350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202612x their median

    ⚡A humanoid robot just ran 100m in 9.39 seconds, faster than Usain Bolt's world record of 9.58! World Humanoid Robot Games 2026 has just started in Beijing! https://t.co/7yDuVHnPGp

    3.1K4811682041.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.0x their median

    🚨BREAKING: CFTC Chair Selig says the CFTC will begin building its own crypto market structure if the CLARITY Act fails to pass. Selig says he has directed staff to "begin exploring rules to codify a CFTC market structure for crypto assets." This could allow crypto exchanges to offer leveraged trading under CFTC oversight for the first time.

    1.6K3676029102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.0x their median

    🚨 HARRISON BUTKER JUST HIT A 69-YARD FIELD GOAL The Chiefs kicker drilled an absolute bomb last night. It would be an NFL record if the league counted preseason stats. https://t.co/skbLeOwofj

    1.7K16086867K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.7x their median

    🔥 UPDATE: X is reportedly considering USDC and other stablecoins for creator payouts as it winds down Revenue Sharing and moves creators to its Original Content Rewards program.Y https://t.co/vaRAZdT07x

    992114873098K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.4x their median

    Gold and Bitcoin are surging in tandem as investors are spooked by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s politically clumsy interventions in the bond market. Gold has jumped to $4,519/oz, while Bitcoin is back >$72,000. When confidence in policy-making gets shaken, both analog and digital gold benefit.

    923151421766K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.6x their median

    My big winners today. I post these because the early winners are likely to also be the late winners (in two years). https://t.co/wRwFEoSQEb

    7115992572K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.352%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.692% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 50.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 67x its own typical post.

What is Don Durrett - goldstockdata.com's engagement rate on X?
Don Durrett - goldstockdata.com (@DonDurrett) has an engagement rate of 0.352%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 94,543 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.352%, Don Durrett - goldstockdata.com sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DonDurrett have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DonDurrett post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going