Back to @Project_Veritas's profile

Project Veritas engagement report

@Project_Veritas - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.078%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
1.40%
82K views on a typical post
Reach
5.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 325K interactions, about 285x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.078%, Project Veritas sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Nov 22, 2025285x their median

    🚨 URGENT Two days ago I was contacted by a high-ranking employee of the French Government. After determining this person’s position and proximity to the French couple, I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something happens. In short, this person claims that the Macrons have executed upon and paid for my assassination. Yes, you read that correctly. More specifically, that the green light was given to a small team in National Gendamarie Intervention Group. I am told there is one Israeli that is on this assasination squad and the plans were formalized. Again, this person provided concrete proof that they are well placed within the French government apparatus. Further to this point, this person claims that Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French legion 13th brigade with multi-state involvement. Journalist Xavier Poussard’s life is also at risk. This is deadly serious. The head of state of France apparently wants us both dead and has authorized professional units to carry this out. I ask that every person RETWEET and share this. I do not know who in the American government can be trusted, since this source claims our leaders are aware. But I have more specific information which is definitively verifiable, should they care to reach out to me. To the brave official in France who did this because they were so moved by the evil of Charlie’s public execution to risk their own life— May God bless you. Truly. Let all be revealed.

    208K85K23K9.6K46M viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 2026189x their median

    Saving LA - Phase III https://t.co/9n9wv1tonZ

    169K30K12K4.2K10M viewsView on X
  • Dec 3, 202442x their median

    BREAKING: @EPA Advisor Admits ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump is Funneling Billions to Climate Organizations, “We’re Throwing Gold Bars off the Titanic” “It was an insurance policy against Trump winning.” “Get the money out as fast as possible before they [Trump Administration] come in ... it’s like we’re on the Titanic and we’re throwing gold bars off the edge.”

    63K33K5.1K4.6K36M viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 202556x their median

    🚨🚨🚨Huge news! Our awesome team @EPA just located BILLIONS of dollars worth of “gold bars” that the Biden Admin threw “off the titanic”. Big update coming tomorrow…https://t.co/md5qWEgUgV

    45K16K1.5K1.0K2.5M viewsView on X
  • Dec 27, 202519x their median

    This is absurd. Can someone please explain the best argument for why we don’t require citizens to show state or federal ID to vote?

    38K6.1K3.0K2362.2M viewsView on X
  • Nov 26, 202511x their median

    “We need to blackmail Candace faster” Project Veritas broke a huge story revealing that AG Bill Bar’s daughter was trying to set up and blackmail Candace Owens when she was a senior DOJ Official. Mary Barr Daly also was trying to set up someone with an underage girl to blackmail him. Also, it appears they were running cover for former Baltimore Candidate Kimberly Klacik. If so, it explains why Klacik has been on a huge rampage against Candace Owens since she questioned her campaign finance spending. Calling her “crazy” and smearing her as “insane”. I dont think Americans understand how deeply corrupt our Government truly is. This is just one text message. Imagine how many other people they have set up and blackmailed.

    21K6.9K4433681.0M viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 20269.2x their median

    I’m concerned by the HHS decision to extend taxpayer funds to Planned Parenthood. I’d like to hear the rationale - and I urge them to change course immediately https://t.co/FeUxBGbxFk

    8.0K2.0K41295284K viewsView on X
  • Nov 28, 20256.1x their median

    Leaked messages published on Project Veritas have ignited a storm around Candace Owens, after claims that the daughter of a former senior Department of Justice official discussed plans to blackmail her. MORE TO COME. https://t.co/jaWPVhkpEN

    5.5K1.3K9242137K viewsView on X
  • Dec 1, 20255.8x their median

    Column's up: Damning report labels FBI "rudderless ship" under Kash Patel and Dan Bongino who are accused of being preoccupied with social media and building "personal résumés" https://t.co/tH96Dt0fRF

    3.6K1.2K1.6K2521.3M viewsView on X
  • May 29, 20254.5x their median

    BREAKING PART TWO: @davidhogg111 Slams Pelosi’s “Too Well-Timed” Stock Trades, Wants to “Burn it All Down” “@SpeakerPelosi gets better returns than almost every hedge fund... every year.” “Conveniently they [Congress] happen to be some of the best financial analysts in human history.”

    3.4K1.3K267157453K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 325K interactions, about 285x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Project Veritas's engagement rate on X?
Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) has an engagement rate of 0.078%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,459,043 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.078%, Project Veritas sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Project_Veritas have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Project_Veritas post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going