Back to @RichardBouselli's profile

Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 engagement report

@RichardBouselli - 10.0K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
593.3%
of 10.0K followers
Per impression
5.37%
1.1M views on a typical post
Reach
11041.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.128%
1.4K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 59K interactions against 10.0K followers, an engagement rate of 593.3%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,717 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 5.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11041.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 198K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,717 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 3 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 593.3%, Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 sits above the 99th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 1% band, which runs 161.6% and above.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.11%
p99161.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,134 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,713 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.11%
99th percentile161.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-4%49K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%42K
05:00 UTC-4%41K
06:00 UTC-4%47K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%68K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%77K
12:00 UTC-2%85K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%99K
16:00 UTC-3%96K
17:00 UTC-2%89K
18:00 UTC-2%83K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%73K
21:00 UTC-1%65K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%228K
Monday0%281K
Tuesday-2%270K
Wednesday-1%249K
Thursday-2%242K
Friday-3%250K
Saturday+3%225K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 20263.3x their median

    Yesterday I went to Minneapolis polls disguised as a Muslim woman. Poll workers were going to let me vote in other people’s names, and then vouch for 8 other unregistered foreigners. Full video coming soon. Stay tuned. @ctznjusticelg https://t.co/D1vumsGg1K

    157K38K1.7K1.2K4.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.3x their median

    I will not be taking anymore questions... what happened happened. https://t.co/PcPqwn4ss0

    116K15K2.0K1.2K4.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.2x their median

    If the Senate passes the SAVE America Act, I will cut my hair.

    112K12K7.4K9742.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20262.1x their median

    Requiring an ID and proof of citizenship to vote is common sense. It’s time to pass the SAVE America Act. RT if you agree.

    97K23K3.6K4281.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20261.9x their median

    James Woods ENDS John Thune’s Career With A Single Line For FAILING to Pass The SAVE America Act: ‘Who Owns You?’ "John Thune, my message is 'Who owns you?' Because you're not doing anything for the United States." "Who wants the SAVE America Act? 82% of Republicans and 75% of Democrats"

    86K25K2.3K709672K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261.9x their median

    New York, how did you elect an Israel-hating, Muslim jihadist mayor 25 years after this? Have you lost your collective minds? https://t.co/i8uUCUza5l

    86K18K6.8K7721.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.8x their median

    Coach White chose to defend Sophie Cunningham’s attacker instead of Sophie Cunningham. There is no coming back from that. Fire her tomorrow. https://t.co/uIQrPikKRE

    94K11K1.5K3471.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261.8x their median

    Liberal White Woman: "Some people loathe you. Do you understand why?" Elon: "Maybe some people do loathe me. That's probably true. I don't care. I think a lot more people hate you and the media than you realize." I love this man!!!!!! 🤣 https://t.co/DpsZ4suVC0

    91K13K1.8K5731.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.6x their median

    Good morning America. It’s a great day for deportations. https://t.co/pn8GofpOMZ

    81K9.2K6.5K9062.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.6x their median

    Your credit score didn’t exist before 1989. For 200 years Americans bought homes and cars without it. Then 3 private companies invented a number that now controls your entire financial life

    82K13K7103811.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59K interactions against 10.0K followers, an engagement rate of 593.3%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,717 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 5.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11041.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 198K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

What is Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔's engagement rate on X?
Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 (@RichardBouselli) has an engagement rate of 593.3%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 9,990 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 593.3%, Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 sits above the 99th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RichardBouselli have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,717 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RichardBouselli post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 (@RichardBouselli) Engagement Rate - 593.3% | PlayerSells