Stock Analyst Kevin engagement report
@Stock__Kevin - 2.7M followers on X
Measured over 163 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 163 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.085% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.043% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 163 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
Measured over 163 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Stock Analyst Kevin's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, Stock Analyst Kevin sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 29, 202615x their median
📊 Marvell's Earnings Exceed Expectations, But Why Did Its Stock Price Plunge? Marvell ($MRVL) released its latest quarterly results: → Revenue of $2.74 billion → Adjusted EPS of $0.94 → Next quarter's revenue guidance: approximately $3.15 billion → Next quarter's adjusted EPS guidance: approximately $1.10 These figures slightly exceeded market expectations, but Marvell's stock price still fell sharply after the earnings release. The problem isn't poor company performance, but rather the market's previously high expectations for its custom AI chip business. Investors had hoped to see custom ASIC projects from cloud providers like Google, driving a more significant upward revision to next quarter's revenue and earnings forecasts. However, Marvell's guidance only slightly exceeded expectations, offering no new surprises to justify its high valuation. This reflects a significant shift in the current AI chip market: → Simply exceeding expectations is no longer enough → The market demands a substantial upward revision of revenue guidance → Custom ASIC projects must translate into actual revenue more quickly → High-valuation companies may experience a significant stock price correction once surprises are absent. Marvell's advantages remain. The company simultaneously develops custom AI chips for cloud vendors, high-speed interconnects, data center optical communications, and network chips, remaining a key player in the AI infrastructure supply chain. However, this stock price reaction indicates that the market is reassessing its expectations regarding how quickly custom ASICs can challenge Nvidia. This also makes Broadcom ($AVGO)'s upcoming earnings report even more crucial. Since Broadcom is also deeply involved in the cloud vendor custom AI chip and high-speed network markets, investors will focus on: → Whether custom AI chip revenue can significantly exceed expectations → Whether orders from Google and other cloud customers continue to expand → Whether the AI networking business can maintain high-speed growth → Whether the guidance for the next quarter is strong enough Marvell's earnings report sends a clear signal: AI demand remains strong, but the capital market's performance threshold for AI chip companies has been pushed to a very high level.
- Aug 20, 20267.0x their median
📊 Tesla (TSLA) Analysis ① Fundamentals Analysis Tesla's core investment logic lies not only in electric vehicle sales but also in the growth potential of its robotaxi, autonomous driving, AI, energy storage, and Optimus businesses. In the second quarter, vehicle deliveries totaled approximately 480,000 units, and energy storage capacity reached 13.5 GWh. Revenue was approximately $28.2 billion, exceeding market expectations, but profitability and cash flow remain burdensome factors. ② Reasons for Today's Rise The current stock price stands at approximately $351, up 4.23% from the previous day. The following factors appear to have influenced the recent rise. → News that Tesla is preparing pilot runs for CyberCab employees in Austin → Expectations for expansion of the robotaxi and autonomous driving businesses → Increase in Q2 vehicle deliveries and growth in the energy storage business → Inflow of technical buying after recovering to around $340 → Liquidation of short-term short positions and improvement in investor sentiment However, it is difficult to explain today's rise with a single piece of news; it appears that expectations for robotaxis and technical buying acted together. ③ Technical Aspects Looking at the 15-minute chart, Tesla formed a strong upward trend from approximately $297 to $351. The current stock price has risen to around the previous high of $351.85, and the short-term uptrend is being maintained. The Fibonacci support lines to check in the event of a correction are as follows: → $331.03: Fibonacci 38.2% 1st Support Level → $324.60: Fibonacci 50% 2nd Support Level → $318.17: Fibonacci 61.8% Key Support Level If the price maintains above $331, the current upward trend is likely to continue. Conversely, if $331 is breached, the correction could extend to $324.60; if this level is also broken, $318.17 must be confirmed. Since the current price is near a short-term high, an approach that confirms support during the correction is more stable than chasing the rally with new buy orders. ④ Key Positive Factors → Expectations for expansion of CyberCab and RoboTaxi businesses → Long-term growth potential for autonomous driving software → Increase in Q2 vehicle deliveries → Continued growth in the energy storage business → Formation of a distinct upward trend since the $297 low ⑤ Key Risk Factors → High possibility of profit-taking due to a sharp rise in the short term → Pressure on profitability and margins in the automotive sector → Increased capital expenditures due to investments in AI and RoboTaxi → Regulatory and commercialization uncertainty regarding the autonomous driving business → The stock price currently reflects future expectations more than actual earnings ⑥ Overall Assessment Tesla has risen to around $351 driven by a combination of expectations for the RoboTaxi and AI businesses, a recovery in vehicle deliveries, and technical buying. While the current upward trend is strong, caution should be exercised regarding increased volatility as the stock is near a short-term high. In the event of a correction, it is important to first confirm $331.03, and in the event of a further decline, to step-by-step examine whether support levels at $324.60 and $318.17 exist. For informational purposes only. This content does not constitute investment advice.
- Aug 18, 20267.0x their median
📊 Analysis of the South Korean KOSPI Composite Index ① Fundamental Analysis The main drivers of the recent KOSPI index have remained large semiconductor stocks such as Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, as well as the reallocation of foreign investors' holdings in South Korea's AI storage industry. The medium-term fundamentals of South Korea's semiconductor industry have not weakened significantly. Demand for HBM, server DRAM, and enterprise-grade SSDs continues to be supported by AI infrastructure investment. Recent foreign capital inflows into Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix have also propelled the KOSPI's rapid rebound from its lows. However, rising US long-term Treasury yields, persistently high international oil prices, and uncertainty surrounding the US-Iran situation continue to suppress risk appetite in Asian markets. The KOSPI's rapid rebound in the early stages suggests that short-term profit-taking pressure remains. Therefore, the current market is in a phase of interplay between "semiconductor fundamental support" and "external macroeconomic risk suppression." ② Technical Analysis Looking at the 15-minute candlestick chart, the KOSPI previously rose from approximately 6,180 points to 7,220 points, before rapidly declining from its high. The corresponding Fibonacci retracement levels for this round of gains are as follows: → 6,817 points: 38.2% key support level → 6,693 points: 50% secondary support level → 6,569 points: 61.8% core support level Today, the index dipped to a low of approximately 6,867 points before rebounding to around 6,953 points, indicating that some buying support emerged before the index approached 6,817 points. This is a positive signal, but it's not yet possible to definitively confirm the end of the correction. The first priority is to observe whether the index can regain its footing in the 6,978-7,000 point range. If the index continues to hold above 6,867 points and successfully breaks through 7,000 points, it indicates stronger short-term rebound momentum, with a potential challenge of 7,100 points, or even a retest of the 7,150-7,220 point range. If the index falls below 6,867 points again, it may retest the 38.2% support level at 6,817 points. As long as 6,817 points is not broken with significant volume, the current short-term upward structure remains valid. If the index breaks below 6,817 points with significant volume and continues to trade below that level, the next level to watch is the 50% support level at 6,693 points; if 6,693 points is breached, it may further test the 61.8% core support level at 6,569 points. ③ Key Positive Factors → The index rebounded significantly before approaching the 38.2% support level. → Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix remain important supporting forces for the index. → AI servers continue to drive demand growth for HBM and high-end storage. → Foreign investors have recently refocused on large South Korean semiconductor stocks. → Following the previous market deleveraging, some speculative positions have been cleared. → A retest of 7,000 points may further improve market sentiment. ④ Key Risk Factors → Rising US long-term Treasury yields may suppress tech stock valuations. → Rising international oil prices will increase South Korean import costs and inflationary pressures. → Geopolitical tensions may fuel market risk aversion. → KOSPI is highly dependent on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. → After a rapid rebound from its lows, the index still faces profit-taking pressure. → The 38.2% support level at 6,817 points has not yet been fully tested. ⑤ Overall Assessment KOSPI's rebound from 6,867 to 6,953 points indicates buying support at lower levels, and the short-term trend has improved compared to before. Currently, three key levels need to be observed: → Holding above 6,867 points: The short-term rebound structure continues. → Re-breaking 7,000 points: The rebound signal is further strengthened. → Falling below 6,867 points: A retest of 6,817 points is possible. → A break below 6,817 points on high volume: The correction may extend to 6,693 points. Overall, the KOSPI has not yet entered a clear downtrend, and the 38.2% Fibonacci support at 6,817 points remains valid. The rebound above this level indicates that market support is recovering. Conclusion: The short-term trend has improved, but 7,000 points remains a key resistance level to confirm whether the rebound can continue. Only by regaining a foothold above 7,000 points can we confirm that the market has a chance to challenge the 7,150-7,220 point area again.
- Aug 29, 20266.0x their median
The Federal Reserve reiterated hawkish signals, putting new tests on tech stock valuations. In his speech at Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh emphasized that if inflation fails to clearly and quickly fall back to the 2% target, the Fed may still need to take further action. This statement dampened some market expectations of an imminent shift to easing monetary policy, prompting investors to reassess the likelihood of a September rate hike. As a result, the three major US stock indices all declined: → Nasdaq down 0.52% → S&P 500 down 0.25% → Dow Jones down slightly 0.02% → Nvidia saw profit-taking after its earnings report, with shares falling 4.6%. The market is currently caught in a tug-of-war between two forces: On the one hand, Nvidia's earnings report demonstrates continued strong demand for AI infrastructure; on the other hand, inflation and interest rate risks are increasing discounting pressure on highly valued tech stocks. This means the market's focus will shift back from corporate earnings reports to macroeconomic data: → US Non-Farm Payrolls → Unemployment Rate and Wage Growth → CPI and Core PCE Inflation → September Fed Interest Rate Decision If employment and inflation data continue to be strong, expectations of interest rate hikes may intensify further, potentially leading to more significant valuation volatility in AI chips, cloud computing, and highly valued software stocks. Conversely, if economic data shows a significant slowdown, the market may re-trade for peak interest rates, driving funds back into growth stocks. Therefore, while the fundamentals of AI have not reversed, the biggest variable for tech stocks in the short term has shifted from "whether demand is slowing" to "whether the Fed will raise interest rates again."
- Aug 23, 20266.0x their median
NVIDIA is preparing to create a US version of DeepSeek and Kimi challengers. According to media reports, NVIDIA will: → Pay $6 billion for a non-exclusive license to Poolside's model development technology → Invest an additional $1 billion in Poolside → Offer positions to 109 technical staff → Use the technology and talent to enhance Nemotron's open models This deal is not a traditional acquisition. Poolside's founders and remaining operations will continue to operate independently, while NVIDIA will acquire the most crucial model development capabilities and some talent. The strategic implications are clear: → NVIDIA is continuing its expansion from a GPU supplier to the model layer → Nemotron is poised to become a major platform for open-source weighted AI in the US → Open models can reduce deployment costs and facilitate enterprise privatization and customization → More model training, fine-tuning, and inference will ultimately increase NVIDIA's computing power requirements This not only challenges DeepSeek and Kimi but also establishes an open ecosystem for NVIDIA, distinct from the closed models of OpenAI and Anthropic. However, whether the $6 billion license can truly translate into cutting-edge modeling capabilities still depends on the integration of Poolside technology, the availability of key personnel, and the actual performance of Nemotron in the future.
- Aug 14, 20266.0x their median
According to South Korean media reports, Samsung Electronics is considering converting the NRD-K Line 2 from an R&D facility into a 2nm foundry Start-Fab, with a focus on producing base dies for custom HBM (cHBM) and HBM5. This is not just a capacity expansion, but also represents Samsung's attempt to build an integrated vertical system encompassing "memory + advanced process + packaging," in order to proactively secure next-generation HBM demand from customers like NVIDIA. If the plan proceeds smoothly, it could both improve Samsung's 2nm capacity utilization and serve as a significant step in narrowing the HBM gap with SK Hynix. However, the line is expected to begin operations in the second half of 2028, and its final use may still be subject to change.
- Aug 29, 20265.0x their median
Affirm's earnings exceeded expectations, with its "buy now, pay later" model continuing to dominate the payments market. Affirm ($AFRM) reported quarterly revenue of approximately $1.2 billion, a 33% year-over-year increase; Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) reached $14.1 billion, a 36% year-over-year increase, indicating continued rapid growth in consumer usage and merchant transaction volume. Following the earnings release, Affirm's stock price rose approximately 6.7%. A key driver of the company's next phase of growth is its partnership with Shopify. The two companies plan to expand Shop Pay installment payment services to Australia, further broadening Affirm's reach outside the US. Affirm projects GMV exceeding $64 billion for fiscal year 2027. This signifies the company's evolution from a single "buy now, pay later" platform to a global installment payment infrastructure embedded within major e-commerce platforms. The investment rationale behind this financial report primarily includes: → Revenue and GMV both maintained growth of over 30% → Shopify channel brings lower-cost merchant and user expansion → International markets are beginning to become a new source of growth → Increased transaction volume is expected to improve network effects → Profitability is improving with business scale However, it is still necessary to pay attention to credit loss rates, financing costs, and changes in the consumer environment. If Affirm relaxes its credit standards in pursuit of GMV growth, the risk of bad debts may increase. Therefore, the truly important aspect of this financial report is not just that the single-quarter figures exceeded expectations, but that Affirm is proving that "buy now, pay later + Shopify channel" can form a sustainable and scalable fintech growth path. Amidst the growth and competitive pressures faced by traditional payment platforms such as PayPal, Affirm has become one of the companies with relatively strong fundamentals in the current US fintech sector.
- Aug 29, 20265.0x their median
📊 Meta Agrees to Pay Up to $18 Billion to Resolve One of the Biggest Legal Risks in the Social Media Industry Meta has reached settlements with almost every state in the U.S., resolving lawsuits alleging that Facebook and Instagram's product design contributed to addiction among children and teenagers. The settlements primarily include: → Paying up to $18 billion over approximately ten years → Restricting some addictive features for teenage users → Strengthening age verification and parental controls → Adjusting recommendation algorithms, notifications, and interaction mechanisms → Continuing independent oversight of youth safety measures Meta did not admit to any wrongdoing while reaching the settlement. While $18 billion seems enormous, the payment structure is equally important. Because the payments will be made in installments over approximately ten years, the annual cash flow pressure is significantly lower than the amount indicated in the headline. It has been reported that approximately $5 billion of this is related to whether other competing platforms accept similar restrictions. More importantly, this agreement helps Meta avoid a protracted trial. If the case proceeds, it could not only reveal more internal documents related to teenage users, but the potential fines sought by various US states could also approach $200 billion. From an investment perspective, Meta has essentially traded a predictable, manageable expense for a legal risk of uncertain scale and potentially greater severity. The company's core advertising business has not been fundamentally damaged, but future growth and monetization targeting younger users will face stricter restrictions. The impact of this settlement will not be limited to Meta. If this agreement becomes the standard template for regulating social media platforms in the US, companies like TikTok, YouTube, and Snap may face similar requirements in the future, including: → Stricter age verification → Limiting the algorithm's continuous recommendation of content to minors → Reducing product features that induce users to stay on the platform for extended periods → Bearing higher compliance and security costs Our institution believes that this settlement remains financially manageable for Meta, but it is of significant strategic importance to the industry. In the short term, Meta's biggest legal uncertainty has decreased significantly; in the long term, it remains to be seen whether stricter youth protection measures will reduce user time spent on the platform and advertising monetization efficiency, or whether they will eventually evolve into a uniform rule that all major social media platforms must abide by.
- Aug 23, 20265.0x their median
🇰🇷 South Korea Plans to Reinvest Semiconductor Tax Revenue into the AI Industry The South Korean government is preparing to establish a "Future Response Fund," planning to use a portion of the excess tax revenue generated by the semiconductor boom for artificial intelligence, youth employment, talent development, and regional industrial development. Media estimates suggest the fund could exceed 100 trillion won, but the government has not yet officially confirmed the specific amount. The relevant bill is expected to be submitted along with the 2027 budget. The logic behind this policy is very clear: → Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix benefit from the AI storage supercycle → Semiconductor company profits and government tax revenue grow in tandem → The government will reinvest a portion of tax revenue into AI and next-generation industries → Further strengthen South Korea's semiconductor and AI ecosystem From a stock market perspective, potential beneficiaries may not only include large storage companies but could also extend to semiconductor equipment, materials, fabless design, data centers, AI software, and talent training companies. What's truly noteworthy is the specific fund size, investment areas, and when the funds will begin to be implemented. Before the official budget is announced, the figure of over 100 trillion won remains a media estimate and cannot be considered a confirmed government commitment. If the plan is successfully implemented, South Korea is forming a long-term industrial cycle of "semiconductor profits – fiscal revenue – AI reinvestment".
- Aug 14, 20265.0x their median
According to Taiwan's DigiTimes, NVIDIA's Feynman platform (the platform after the next generation) will directly adopt A16, which is TSMC's upgraded version of its 2nm process, and will increase the proportion of SoIC 3D stacking. It is also expected to combine customized HBM and CPO on this basis. Accordingly, TSMC's monthly SoIC capacity is reportedly set to reach 50,000 wafers per month by the end of 2027. Also noteworthy is that the AP7 P2 production line, originally planned for SoIC, may be partially allocated to CPO and CoWoS production lines. This could imply that CPO is being advanced earlier than expected. ASE's subsidiary SPIL is also reportedly establishing itself as a major supplier for NVIDIA orders. This stems from the fact that even with TSMC ramping up production at full capacity, it remains difficult to meet all customer demand.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 163 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.085% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.043% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 163 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
- What is Stock Analyst Kevin's engagement rate on X?
- Stock Analyst Kevin (@Stock__Kevin) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 163 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,749,907 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, Stock Analyst Kevin sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Stock__Kevin have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Stock__Kevin post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.57 posts per day across the measured window.