Back to @TravelEsquire's profile

TRAVEL Esquire ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐ŸŒโœˆ๏ธ engagement report

@TravelEsquire - 99K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 99K followers
Per impression
1.10%
634 views on a typical post
Reach
0.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 634 times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.639% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 928x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #ุงู„ุณุนูˆุฏูŠุฉ.

Compared with accounts its own size

TRAVEL Esquire ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐ŸŒโœˆ๏ธ's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, TRAVEL Esquire ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐ŸŒโœˆ๏ธ sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 2026928x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ดู‚ุฑูŠุจู‹ุง : ุงู„ุฃุณุฏ ุงู„ุนุฑุจูŠ ูŠุนูˆุฏ ุงู„ู‰ #ุงู„ุณุนูˆุฏูŠุฉ ุจุนุฏ ู‚ุฑูˆู† ู…ู† ุงู„ุงู†ู‚ุฑุงุถ ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. https://t.co/NHp9LY1HUH

    5.1K5015033703.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 2026596x their median

    90 year old Agnes Kasparkova turns her small village into an art gallery in the Czech Republic. https://t.co/sHqtGDDLSv

    3.5K591782250K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026552x their median

    The 2,300-year-old Roman road, the Appian Way, and that is still in use today. https://t.co/tp3pyiDqex

    3.2K574242364K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026432x their median

    ุซุจุช ุชุงุฑูŠุฎูŠู‹ุง ูˆุฌูˆุฏู‡ุง ููŠ ุงู„ู…ุญู…ูŠุฉ.. ู…ุญู…ูŠุฉ ุงู„ุฃู…ูŠุฑ ู…ุญู…ุฏ ุจู† ุณู„ู…ุงู† ุงู„ู…ู„ูƒูŠุฉ ุชุนู…ู„ ุนู„ู‰ ุฅุนุงุฏุฉ ุชูˆุทูŠู† ุงู„ุณู„ุงู„ุฉ ุงู„ูุฑุนูŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ู‡ุฏุฏุฉ ุจุงู„ุงู†ู‚ุฑุงุถ ู…ู† ุงู„ุฃุณุฏ ุงู„ุขุณูŠูˆูŠ. - https://t.co/H3RzAUjqkI

    2.7K2206825621K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 2026333x their median

    ๐ŸŸชThe avenues of Cagliari, in southern Sardinia, painted purple by the summer bloom of jacaranda trees. ๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธIg @ivanpedretti https://t.co/IlE1hqdgKC

    2.0K320271257K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2026238x their median

    There are places like the Ralph Lauren restaurant in Saint-Germain-des-Prรฉs that allow you to forget who you are https://t.co/YyASmLHSZB

    1.5K11844832K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 2026165x their median

    The Porch of the Caryatids, Erectheion, Acropolis, Athens. https://t.co/MqBXHSlIgW

    95915931435K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2018103x their median

    A steam-powered clock?! ๐Ÿ•ฐ Only in #Vancouver! ๐ŸŒ‡๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ’ซ 10 Reasons to โค๏ธ Rocky Mountaineer #Luxury ๐Ÿšž #TrainTravel! ๐Ÿ”๐ŸŒฒ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿฅ‚๐Ÿพ #CanadianRockies https://t.co/GTvVcF5uGL @rmountaineer @FairmontVan #LuxuryTravel #travel #RockyMountaineer #luxurylife #ad https://t.co/RLSeXS8Rpo

    532134469View on X
  • Aug 15, 202651x their median

    2439km, 350km/h,10 hours, 170USD, China's fastest sleeper train. Beijing to Hong Kong.๐Ÿ˜ƒ๐Ÿ˜ƒ https://t.co/EFGVqr4fc4

    283549817K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202624x their median

    This $268,000 rotating trailer swings out to offer campers a spacious glamping stay. https://t.co/zpXdAyCYcK

    135257222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ุงู„ุณุนูˆุฏูŠุฉ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 634 times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.639% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 928x its own typical post.

What is TRAVEL Esquire ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐ŸŒโœˆ๏ธ's engagement rate on X?
TRAVEL Esquire ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐ŸŒโœˆ๏ธ (@TravelEsquire) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,237 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, TRAVEL Esquire ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐ŸŒโœˆ๏ธ sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TravelEsquire have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TravelEsquire post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going