Yves Mulkers engagement report
@YvesMulkers - 100K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.095% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28 interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Yves Mulkers's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Yves Mulkers sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 86K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 81K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 234K |
| Monday | 0% | 294K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 288K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 247K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Jan 15, 202628x their median
Every day I scan 200K+ sources so you don't have to. Here's what I look for: → What's actually moving (not what's trending) → Patterns across multiple stories → Signal vs noise Free daily briefing: https://t.co/KNtNLIRTOQ No spam. Just intelligence. https://t.co/XtyCoeqAUq
- Aug 6, 20269.0x their median
Anthropic ran a warehouse to scan physical books for AI training, then destroyed them once digitized. Not archived, destroyed. They're calling what's left a 'forever' research library. Comment 'panama' for my before-you-destroy-a-source checklist. https://t.co/PkCFThfvO5
- Aug 15, 20267.0x their median
Data center operators are quietly shopping for insurance now. Underwriters keep asking one thing back: can this risk even be modeled? Nobody's got a clean answer yet. Comment 'modeled' and I'll send the 3 questions insurers ask that boards don't. https://t.co/kfeVgQE9u8
- Aug 13, 20267.0x their median
OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta each had a model cross into off-limits territory during routine cybersecurity testing this month. Same root cause behind all three: a shared hole in the eval environment, not an outside hack. Comment 'seams' and I'll send the vendor questions. https://t.co/pXYPKrb1AD
- Aug 5, 20266.0x their median
Take your most-used AI workflow. Name the one step that's allowed to guess, and the one that isn't. If you can't answer that in one sentence, nobody's written it down. Comment 'guess' and I'll send two more questions like this one. https://t.co/1hnz9wzPmr
- Aug 4, 20266.0x their median
A language model doesn't reason like a clinician, it predicts the next likely word, well enough to look like reasoning. In clinical care a confident wrong answer is more dangerous than silence. Comment 'predicts' and I'll send the 3 questions I'd ask before it touches a chart.
- Aug 14, 20265.0x their median
A Forrester Consulting study found Algolia delivered $3.1M NPV over three years. Commissioned studies come back positive, that is not a conspiracy, that is just who paid for the study. Read the number, then ask who funded it. Ask for the churn number next. Tell me what they say.
- Aug 9, 20264.0x their median
'Compliance' just quietly dropped off my topic board. AI Governance, Data Governance, and Risk Management are all climbing together in its place. One word split into three because the old one stopped working alone. Seeing this outside data infra too? Tell me. https://t.co/GRRBrG5Kd1
- Aug 3, 20264.0x their median
Spent today comparing vendor pitch decks against this week's actual momentum data. The gap between what's loud and what's working keeps widening. Reading a room is a DJ skill nobody teaches in procurement. Comment 'reading' and I'll send how I separate hype from real signal.
- Aug 2, 20264.0x their median
Cloudera still sells perpetual on-prem licenses with an annual maintenance fee, right next to AWS, GCP, and Azure metered by the second. Old pricing models don't die when better ones ship. They die when the renewal finally comes due. Seeing the same lag in your stack? Say so.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.095% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28 interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
- What is Yves Mulkers's engagement rate on X?
- Yves Mulkers (@YvesMulkers) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,882 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Yves Mulkers sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @YvesMulkers have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @YvesMulkers post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.