Zen engagement report
@ZenXBT - 1.8M followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.189% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 847x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Zen sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jan 15, 2026847x their median
We are revising our developer API policies: We will no longer allow apps that reward users for posting on X (aka “infofi”). This has led to a tremendous amount of AI slop & reply spam on the platform. We have revoked API access from these apps, so your X experience should start improving soon (once the bots realize they’re not getting paid anymore). If your developer account was terminated, please reach out and we will assist in transitioning your business to Threads and Bluesky.
- May 13, 202624x their median
IF YOU SUDDENLY GOT RICH, DO THIS 5 THINGS IMMEDIATELY 1. Privacy is your first move https://t.co/izGetUQDjI
- Jan 14, 20264.5x their median
https://t.co/Rs2A5xVIYq
- Apr 28, 20261.7x their median
Nhà cũ một chút, sân vườn nhiều cây xanh to, sân vườn sạch sẽ. Toát lên vẻ gia tộc giàu sang nhỉ https://t.co/21KAiDwhgp
- Jan 3, 20261.6x their median
10,000 hours is the time it takes to master a field. 10,000 hours is full-time work for 5 years—that’s a huge amount of time. We’ve learned new things before, and it didn’t take us anywhere near that long, right? => So why is that? What’s wrong here? What the researchers say, what we expect, and what we actually experience don’t match up. And what I discovered is: the 10,000-hour rule comes from studies at the expert level. This research was done on professional athletes, world-class musicians, chess grandmasters, … => These are all top individuals in highly competitive fields. => The people at the very top put in around 10,000 hours of practice. => To reach a level of proficiency—not to become the best—we don’t need anywhere near 10,000 hours. 10,000 hours is the approximate time to become a world-class expert in a new field. But to learn a new skill, you don’t need that much. Just 20 hours of focused practice is enough. The biggest barrier to learning new things isn’t intelligence, it isn’t learning a bunch of little tips and tricks, or clever hacks. The biggest barrier is emotional—we’re afraid!!! Feeling stupid isn’t pleasant at all. When you start learning anything new, you feel really dumb. => The main barrier isn’t intellectual; it’s emotional. But try committing a total of about 20 hours to any new skill you want. Whatever it is. For example, if you spend one truly focused hour a day playing the piano, after 20 days I’d bet you could play your first song proficiently.
- Dec 26, 2025
When a person with money meets a person with experience, the person with experience will gain money, and the person with money will gain experience. https://t.co/KItoQ2XX7N
- Apr 19, 2026
Chúng ta thường chỉ nhìn vào sự thành công, thành quả đã đạt được của một trade chuyên nghiệp nào đó. Mà chúng ta quên mất rằng đó là thứ hữu hình, còn nghĩa trang vô hình nơi chất đầy xác của những trade đã ngã xuống thì chúng ta lại không chú ý đến. Và chắc bạn chưa để ý là có đến 90% trade sau một thời gian tham gia thị trường ( thường là 1 tháng đến 2 năm) đã “chết” để rồi họ chìm vào quên lãng, âm thầm rời bỏ thị trường và mang đi những trải nghiệm về sự thất bại của họ. Đằng sau hào quang của một đế vương là một bãi tha ma chứa đầy thi hài của những người lính đã ngã xuống. Đằng sau hào quang thành công của một trade chuyên nghiệp là những lần vấp ngã, thử và sai, cháy và làm lại… là sự trải nghiệm và tích luỹ kinh nghiệm cá nhân cả về kỹ thuật và tâm lý. Để rồi đến một ngày khi đủ dày dặn, đủ trải nghiệm, họ được nhắc đến như hình mẫu lý tưởng của nghề trade. Và không ai để ý rằng tới 90% những người khỏi hành cùng trade thành công ấy đã ngã xuống, vĩnh viễn rời khỏi cuộc chơi. Vậy, bạn có tự tin rằng mình sẽ trở thành 10% trade thành công kia? Tôi nghĩ, nếu bạn vẫn chỉ bận rộn hóng kèo nơi này nơi kia, thắng thì khen thua thì chửi. Thì bạn sẽ sớm đến với nghịa địa của trade mà thôi. Để tồn tại bạn bắt buộc phải tự đi trên đôi chân của chính mình, biết chịu trách nhiệm với túi tiền của mình, biết sai và sửa sai. Thì mới mong có ngày hái được quả ngọt.
- Jan 2, 2026
We learn from repetition—and have to pay the price with events that have never happened before. Non-repeating events are often forgotten until they actually occur, while at the same time they are also overvalued (for a certain period of time) afterward. After a Black Swan phenomenon like the September 11, 2001 attacks, people assume it will repeat, whereas in reality, its probability is considered very low by many. We like to think about specific Black Swans that we have already experienced, whereas in reality, the nature of randomness lies precisely in its abstraction.
- Dec 17, 2025
Many projects, despite being backed by Tier 1 funds, still fail to generate profits and often shut down after a while. The common characteristic of these projects is extremely poor engagement on social platforms. Although the funds investing in these projects are Tier 1, their actual Retail ROI is very low. #crypto #beautiful #venturecapital #vc
- Jul 28, 2026
Đám đông có đủ sức mạnh để tạo nên xu hướng, đám đông có thể không quá thông minh, nhưng có thể mạnh hơn bất kỳ ai trong mỗi chúng ta. Đừng bao giờ đi ngược xu hướng. Nếu xu hướng tăng, bạn chỉ nên mua hoặc đứng ngoài. Đừng bao giờ bán khống chỉ vì cho rằng “ mức giá này là quá cao”. Đừng bao giờ tranh cãi với đám đông. Bạn có thể không cần thiết phải chạy theo đám đông, nhưng bạn không được phép chống lại đám đông. Hãy tôn trọng sức mạnh của đám đông, nhưng đừng e sợ nó. Đám đông có sức mạnh, nhưng nguyên thuỷ. Hành vi của đám đông đơn giản và có tính lặp lại. Hiểu một cách đơn giản thì đám đông giống như dòng lũ, việc để sống sót là xuôi theo dòng rồi tìm cách tấp vào bờ. Chứ không phải là bơi ngược rồi tìm cách bám vào đá.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.189% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 847x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Zen's engagement rate on X?
- Zen (@ZenXBT) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,766,726 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Zen sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ZenXBT have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @ZenXBT post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.