Back to @barbiebrookeecc's profile

π‘©π’“π’π’π’Œπ’† π‘ͺπ’‰π’“π’Šπ’”π’•π’Šπ’π’† β˜… engagement report

@barbiebrookeecc - 100K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
28.3%
of 100K followers
Per impression
4.50%
627K views on a typical post
Reach
629.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.169%
1.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.33/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 28K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 28.3%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,716 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 627K times each, and 4.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 630.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 462K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bluevelvet, #davidlynch.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #bluevelvet, #davidlynch.

Compared with accounts its own size

π‘©π’“π’π’π’Œπ’† π‘ͺπ’‰π’“π’Šπ’”π’•π’Šπ’π’† β˜…'s engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,716 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 28.3%, π‘©π’“π’π’π’Œπ’† π‘ͺπ’‰π’“π’Šπ’”π’•π’Šπ’π’† β˜… sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.11% to 161.6%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.11%
p99161.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,134 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,713 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.11%
99th percentile161.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-4%49K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%42K
05:00 UTC-4%41K
06:00 UTC-4%47K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%68K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%77K
12:00 UTC-2%85K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%99K
16:00 UTC-3%96K
17:00 UTC-2%89K
18:00 UTC-2%83K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%73K
21:00 UTC-1%65K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%228K
Monday0%281K
Tuesday-2%270K
Wednesday-1%249K
Thursday-2%242K
Friday-3%250K
Saturday+3%225K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202616x their median

    when trump dies the first thing im doing is opening twitter

    412K48K6558644.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202610x their median

    girls will see a picture of themselves from the lowest moment of their life and be like β€œomg I was so skinny…”

    248K29K5014.5K3.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20268.7x their median

    Yeah bro she’s using you for your slightly above average penis and empty bank account bro

    230K14K4025574.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20266.1x their median

    The summer i turned insane

    124K47K1561.3K2.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20265.7x their median

    Y'all don't ignore ppl enough. That's why you stressed out.

    127K31K3891.2K2.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20265.0x their median

    β€œwho’s pussy is this” genuinely just enjoy it while u got it bro

    132K9.8K1955893.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.8x their median

    How it feels to flirt w anyone https://t.co/8kM5MW8X94

    125K9.0K827271.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.4x their median

    pedΓ­ un aumento y me despidieron https://t.co/FjiZDIL3WM

    116K5.9K2746922.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.0x their median

    Literally this https://t.co/Q9KR1o82GV

    107K4.9K1223611.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.8x their median

    sucking dick is so fun I wish men were good ppl

    95K12K3337762.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bluevelvet#davidlynch

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 28.3%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,716 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 627K times each, and 4.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 630.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 462K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bluevelvet, #davidlynch.

What is π‘©π’“π’π’π’Œπ’† π‘ͺπ’‰π’“π’Šπ’”π’•π’Šπ’π’† β˜…'s engagement rate on X?
π‘©π’“π’π’π’Œπ’† π‘ͺπ’‰π’“π’Šπ’”π’•π’Šπ’π’† β˜… (@barbiebrookeecc) has an engagement rate of 28.3%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,520 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 28.3%, π‘©π’“π’π’π’Œπ’† π‘ͺπ’‰π’“π’Šπ’”π’•π’Šπ’π’† β˜… sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @barbiebrookeecc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,716 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @barbiebrookeecc post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going