Back to @bettingkingz9's profile

BK Sports engagement report

@bettingkingz9 - 477K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.121%
of 477K followers
Per impression
1.55%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
7.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
576
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 576 interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.121%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

BK Sports's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.121%, BK Sports sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202614x their median

    🚨 Manchester United have been offered the opportunity to sign Chelsea centre-back Tosin Adarabioyo. πŸ”΄πŸ‘€ Michael Carrick is keen to strengthen his defensive options, with the 28-year-old emerging as a potential target. (Source: @GiveMeSport) https://t.co/JQxfWcoj4w

    6.4K511533439393K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.5x their median

    Only Chelsea could perform this miracle. https://t.co/eJ4gQ2PhVu

    3.4K27650954K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20266.3x their median

    Arsenal fans Barcola or Morgan Rodgers? https://t.co/ezJXigCXE9

    2.5K139687283839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.1x their median

    Before you pay that rent, remember you can double it with 2odds 🀌

    2.3K575497120111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.8x their median

    This was the final straw https://t.co/dYDTxkusJq

    3.1K223351542K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    The KINGS of the transfer market. https://t.co/UFYBc25mqJ

    1.9K304542052K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.7x their median

    Watching EPL for FREE. Priceless βœ… https://t.co/e4psAW10SP https://t.co/Uy71ZQHzuF

    1.8K282285212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.7x their median

    007 does not exist for Chelsea. https://t.co/K4ny7QbvJN

    1.4K15131329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.7x their median

    Only Chelsea Football Club πŸ’™ https://t.co/GEA0XZlkkt

    1.3K17953546K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    I really don’t understand the point of Danny Welbeck. Was such a needless signing

    9892623971209K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 576 interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.121%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is BK Sports's engagement rate on X?
BK Sports (@bettingkingz9) has an engagement rate of 0.121%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 477,119 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.121%, BK Sports sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bettingkingz9 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bettingkingz9 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going