Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci

Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci Bluesky Profile Stats

@gemcarey.bsky.socialEnglish flagEnglishBusinessTier C
View on Bluesky
Account age: 3 years (joined July 2023)

Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci Bluesky stats, updated continuously. @gemcarey.bsky.social has 2,638 followers and 97 posts on Bluesky. Account age: 3 years (joined July 2023).

Followers
2.6K
Growth (7d)
-
Following
86
Posts
97~0.1/day
Influence
11

Follower growth

Not enough history yet - growth is tracked from first discovery.

Bio

@UNSW (& non academic author side hustle). Public administration, social policy+public health scholar .Lots of NDIS. Vax injury, but pro vax

Notable followers

The biggest accounts in our directory following @gemcarey.bsky.social.

Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci on Bluesky - frequently asked questions

How many followers does Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci have on Bluesky?
Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci (@gemcarey.bsky.social) has 2,638 followers on Bluesky. The count is refreshed continuously from the public AT Protocol.
When did Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci join Bluesky, and how old is the account?
Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci joined Bluesky in July 2023. The @gemcarey.bsky.social account is 3 years old. Searches for Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci age often mean a personal age, which we do not publish. The figure here is the account age only.
How many posts has Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci published?
Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci has published 97 posts on Bluesky. That is about 0.1 posts per day over the life of the account.
Is Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci verified on Bluesky?
@gemcarey.bsky.social does not currently show a Bluesky verification. Many real accounts on Bluesky are unverified, since verification is still rolling out.
What does Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci post about?
Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci is classified under Business in our directory. Bio: "@UNSW (& non academic author side hustle). Public administration, social policy+public health scholar .Lots of NDIS. Vax injury, but pro vax".