Back to @Acyn's profile

Acyn engagement report

@Acyn - 774K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 774K followers
Per impression
0.685%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
6.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
322
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 322 interactions against 774K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.685% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 70x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Acyn's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Acyn sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202670x their median

    El-Sayed: Well, I’ll tell you this. Every time J.D. Vance opens his mouth, the first two things I can think are, man, that guy is boring. And second, Peter Thiel had to spend a ton of money to get that man elected, barely in the state of Ohio.  But the confusing thing about it is that he thinks that there are some people who are more American than others because they can point to their Papaw who was here earlier. And my question to him is simply, why is it then, how do you look your parents-in-law in the eye and say that somehow they’re less American than you are? Because that’s what he’s implying there. But bigger picture, this is about trying to change the channel. They’re trying to dissuade us from actually paying attention to the issues that we see laid bare when we talk about our kitchen table budget every single month. My name and my background aren’t raising your gas prices. That’s what the Trump administration is doing. My name and my background aren’t picking trade wars to increase your costs. That’s what the Trump administration is doing. My name and my background aren’t the reason you can’t see a doctor. That’s because of the Medicaid cuts and the ACA cuts that are about to come down the pike next year because of what the Trump administration is doing. So if you don’t want to talk about what you’re doing, that’s fine, but I encourage you to leave my name and my background out of it. This is an America that’s big enough for all of us, even if J.D. Vance doesn’t agree, except for the fact that he actually understands and benefits from the nature of immigration and the fact that we are a bigger country because we are inclusive of people who don’t have Papaws who were here 50 years ago.

    19K3.4K408131811K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202628x their median

    Shapiro: When he sits behind the desk in the Oval Office, making $2.2 billion off his corruption for him and his kids, it costs you money. That money came out of somebody else’s pocket to go into his. When he sits behind that desk, he’s not thinking about how to put money in your pocket. He’s thinking about how to put money in his own pocket.

    7.0K1.9K11627135K viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 202317x their median

    I’ve only been able to keep up with all the events this week by capturing and posting clips through @Snapstream. If your organization needs to keep up with and respond to the news cycle, you can learn more here: https://t.co/677bA6FWOJ

    4.2K1.2K06339M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202616x their median

    Abdul El-Sayed will appear on Jesse Watters Primetime on Monday according to Fox https://t.co/EY4cOIUNIF

    4.5K328176131612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202613x their median

    El-Sayed: Why would you invite JD Vance? We don’t have more couches here than they do in Ohio. https://t.co/Hmb6dCDRBv

    3.8K3086160195K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20268.5x their median

    Matthews: When I was working on the campaign for a year, and then at the White House for the last seven months of the first administration, the only person I never met was Melania Trump. It was this known thing that she was just not around, and she didn’t want to be around. It’s been reported that Melania gets paid for showing up at events when they were on the campaign trail, which is crazy to think that you have to pay your own wife to show up somewhere. I can guarantee that Melania does not like the Natalie Harp story being out there in the news… And so I think—I imagine her rate has gone up now, given all the news happening this week.

    2.3K4243813275K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.7x their median

    Meiselas: This is a breaking news alert. There is no trade deal between Canada and the United States. Donald Trump and his regime were pretending that there was a deal or a concept or a framework that Donald Trump did his own extension right when the deadline was about to hit. As I’ve always said, you can’t do any deal with bad people. And Donald Trump is a fraud, and the people he surrounds himself with are frauds and bad people.

    1.6K447601886K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.7x their median

    I think most Republican leaning guests have given up on defending this because otherwise it ends up with moments like this. Robbins: It's not a secret that Trump came into office already a wealthy man. That's not what the American people are having a problem with. They have a problem with people like Nancy Pelosi. Phillip: So the president’s net worth jumping by about $4 billion in 18 months, you think that’s a normal thing? Robbins: Is it normal thing to go from like nothing to 400 million like what happened with Nancy Pelosi? Phillip: I mean, if you have a problem with Nancy Pelosi, you shouldn't you have a problem with this? Robbins: I’m not saying I have a problem with it. Phillip: You just said you did. Robbins: I said most Americans would have an issue with it if they have an issue Phillip: Why would they have an issue with Nancy Pelosi but not Donald Trump? Robbins: Because Donald Trump came in to be a public servant. And that is what the job entails

    1.7K25715637184K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.5x their median

    Joe Manchin says he will “absolutely not” back AOC for president 2028. “I don’t want her as the leader of our country at all” https://t.co/EpKc7SlGbH

    44361519119272K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.2x their median

    Cocchiarella: What do you make of the media frenzy around Hasan Piker? Hogg: I find it kind of weird. He’s a streamer. He’s not an elected official. And there are a lot of elected officials out there right now saying horrible things. I think it’s fascinating that they’re obsessed with a streamer that the median voter knows nothing about.

    828111711394K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 322 interactions against 774K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.685% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 70x its own typical post.

What is Acyn's engagement rate on X?
Acyn (@Acyn) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 774,345 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Acyn sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Acyn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Acyn post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going