Back to @AfterRMC's profile

After Foot RMC engagement report

@AfterRMC - 794K followers on X

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 794K followers
Per impression
0.65%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
4.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
226
interactions (median)
Saved
0.046%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 794K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #rmclive.

Compared with accounts its own size

After Foot RMC's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, After Foot RMC sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 20266.2x their median

    🔥⚪🔵 @EltoMok : "Bruno Génésio sera le meilleur coach de la saison. Et l'OM sera sur le podium." https://t.co/kihC1jcF72

    1.2K9011437154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.5x their median

    🗣💬 "Ça fait partie du football de chambrer mais il faut quand même rester mesuré à un certain moment. Il ne voulait limite pas s'arrêter. Mais, au bout d'un moment, stop." @samumtiti regrette les incessantes provocations de Guendouzi envers les supporters de l'OL. https://t.co/mTJgr8hGEC

    8977223036518K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.4x their median

    🗣️ "Sortir le Ballon d’Or et un candidat au Ballon d’Or à la mi-temps montre encore une fois l’exigence et l’importance de Luis Enrique. Même après un back to back, il n’y a pas de cadeaux." 👏 @walidacherchour salue les choix du coach parisien face au Stade Rennais. https://t.co/7AXP4WRRUQ

    1.1K12325261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.0x their median

    🔴🟡 @Menehem02 "Moi, si j’étais Frank McCourt, je me dirais : 'Mais regardez ce que Joseph Oughourlian a réussi en investissant 80 millions d’euros.' Il a investi dix fois moins que lui et a stabilisé et restructuré son club.” https://t.co/F80lBkIzFb

    713639820202K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.8x their median

    ❌ @walidacherchour : "Daniel, à un moment donné, le football c'est de l'argent. Camara et Zakaria ont des gros salaires et font le job. Du côté marseillais, t'as donné des sous à des mecs qui te crèvent à tous les matchs !" 🗣️ Gros débat sur l'OM dans l'After ! https://t.co/gfSDHKr6pJ

    7805716383K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.4x their median

    Maxime Chanot sur les débuts de Genesio à l'OM : "Je pensais qu'il allait ramener du calme, de la sérénité et la semaine dernière, il pète un boulon sur sa direction pour une histoire qui arrive à chaque mercato." #RMCLive https://t.co/87PuRYpFm3

    1338508125765K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.4x their median

    🗣️ Gilbert Brisbois sur l'imbroglio PSG-Rennes : "Rennes est mis devant le fait accompli. Il peut aussi réclamer trois points si le PSG est incapable de proposer un stade." #RMCLive https://t.co/eqNI2n06C7

    628418315146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.3x their median

    ❌ @walidacherchour: "Je suis effrayé par la situation de l'OM, et le pire reste à venir. Si certains joueurs importants partent, je n'exclus pas une saison à la niçoise. À la place de Genesio, si il n'a pas été prévenu d'une telle situation, je pense sérieusement à me barrer." https://t.co/3IGax0613h

    611684615254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.9x their median

    🎙️💥 @walidacherchour sur Lens-Auxerre : "Pour moi il n'y a jamais peno sur le premier penalty et je trouve le carton rouge très sévère. Ces deux décisions vont dans le sens de Lens et tuent le résultat final." https://t.co/yuDNYSXTmn

    5335056744K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.9x their median

    ❌👀 @DanielRiolo : "J'étais en train de me régaler de l'arbitrage en 1ère mi-temps. Et à 30 minutes de la fin, on est tombé dans le carton rouge stupide. Et si c'est le règlement qui demande de mettre rouge ici, c'est que le règlement est con... Le match est mort après ça." https://t.co/4g24pbD1En

    4572814415189K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#rmclive

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 794K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

What is After Foot RMC's engagement rate on X?
After Foot RMC (@AfterRMC) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 111 original posts from the last 30 days against 793,765 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, After Foot RMC sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AfterRMC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AfterRMC post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going