Back to @AlexBerenson's profile

Alex Berenson engagement report

@AlexBerenson - 556K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.095%
of 556K followers
Per impression
1.61%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
5.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
526
interactions (median)
Saved
0.136%
44 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 526 interactions against 556K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alex Berenson's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.095%, Alex Berenson sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.083% to 0.445%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.445%
p902.07%
p99144.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,299 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 90,063 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.445%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile144.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%58K
02:00 UTC-4%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%82K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%98K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%111K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%96K
19:00 UTC-2%91K
20:00 UTC-1%85K
21:00 UTC-1%75K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%58K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%253K
Monday+1%324K
Tuesday-2%348K
Wednesday-4%309K
Thursday-2%264K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%247K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 5, 202017x their median

    Hey @neil_ferguson: Fuck you. You shut down the world but ignored the lockdown to fuck a married woman? How’s that for tone? https://t.co/vn4x0TVMve https://t.co/oaTDDNT92E

    6.2K1.8K518479View on X
  • Sep 14, 202213x their median

    The six phases of mRNA vaccine failure: Euphoria Side Effects Mandates Denial Regrets Prosecution

    5.5K1.1K16559View on X
  • Jun 11, 20266.3x their median

    Fun fact: NOT ONE PERSON IN THE US HAS DIED OF MEASLES IN 2026. Not one. We've had a total of 127 measles hospitalizations this year - 0.001% of all hospital stays. And the outbreaks peaked FIVE MONTHS AGO. I favor measles vaccination. But can the media please drop the drama? https://t.co/pNIAFKEk0N

    2.8K4248918554K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    New Unreported Truths, about the stunning study suggesting the flu medicine Tamiflu is not just useless, but deadly https://t.co/une8YDs2PN

    1.1K319221333K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.7x their median

    Please stop comparing Andrea Yates and Lindsay Clancy. Yates killed her kids to send them to Heaven. She arranged their dead bodies so they would protect each other after she killed them. Yates was insane by any definition. Clancy killed her children because she couldn't admit she was unfit to care for them - and she feared losing them if she did. Giving her the benefit of the doubt: she knew she was in trouble, she wanted help, but she didn't want to admit how sick she really was. Maybe that makes her insane. But that's not the standard for insanity legally. And I don't think it should be. Killing your own children is always an irrational, evil, monstrous act. But parents sometimes kill their own children when they fear losing them - particularly in custody fights. And no one gives those fathers and mothers the benefit of the doubt. No one pretends they are legally insane. I believe in a narrow insanity standard, PARTICULARLY when the crime is inexplicable and monstrous. The psychosis has to lie in the perpetrator and not the act.

    1.2K681203225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.7x their median

    Thanks to the great @NellieBowles of @TheFP for saying it Six years ago, health bureaucrats and blue-state politicians sacrificed the mental health of the young for zero reason. They still haven’t admitted the long-run impact https://t.co/X8kKjFpctA

    1.1K22135928K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.9x their median

    One fact no one gets (and this is not really about Lindsay Clancy): Doctors are basically barred from seeing a patient's earlier prescriptions (or even talking to her other treating physicians) without her consent. This gives drug-seeking, doctor-shopping patients a huge edge.

    8395195645K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    By recent @nytimes standards, this is an amazingly honest look at race and academia. I’m sure @nhannahjones hates it https://t.co/EeODCPR7Go

    5214419232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Does radiation at cruising altitude cause deadly cancers in pilots and flight attendants? A new @JAMAInternalMed study suggests the answer is yes https://t.co/vOj6StgExm

    379413610141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    Read some more Philip K Dick and I reached the twin conclusions I always reach when I read Philip K Dick 1: The future used to be way scarier 2; We don’t worry about nuclear war enough https://t.co/eVrye4vKso

    102612119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 526 interactions against 556K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Alex Berenson's engagement rate on X?
Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) has an engagement rate of 0.095%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 555,623 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.095%, Alex Berenson sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlexBerenson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlexBerenson post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going