Amy Siskind engagement report
@Amy_Siskind - 448K followers on X
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 448K followers, an engagement rate of 0.283%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 8.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 56x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ny17, #txlege.
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #ny17, #txlege.
Compared with accounts its own size
Amy Siskind's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.283%, Amy Siskind sits above the 50th percentile of the 217,857 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 29% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 34% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 29% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 321 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 202656x their median
Trump to a just 10-year-old boy who was saved by a 16-year-old lifeguard. “I probably wouldn't have jumped into the water to rescue you. You’re lucky I wasn't on duty.” Their facial expressions don’t lie. What a messed up thing to say. https://t.co/S2LntDi8sq
- Aug 23, 202614x their median
Wonder why Hegseth fired senior staffers at Stars and Stripes? It’s because of reporting like this: “Nearly six months after the U.S. Navy evacuated 1,300 family members from Bahrain at the start of the Iran war, officials are saying the evacuees cannot return for the foreseeable future and should find new homes elsewhere. The evacuation has left families in limbo and forced military officials to improvise solutions for support programs that were never designed to sustain a displacement lasting this long. Some evacuees say they have spent tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket for basic living expenses. Others are sleeping on the floors of temporary housing, while their cars and furniture are stranded in Bahrain or aboard ships unable to leave the region.” https://t.co/RDPGHi5gzn
- Sep 6, 202612x their median
https://t.co/LheWlPhkuN
- Aug 30, 202611x their median
F%ck you @Google https://t.co/v1CWnxDXP2
- Sep 8, 202611x their median
This is simply vile. Trump is a loser, and an embarrassment to our country. https://t.co/yBLYND8fly
- Oct 27, 20267.6x their median
Deservedly scathing op-ed by the NYT: “If Democrats retake both houses of Congress, and more state governments than they now control, it will tell the world that Mr. Trump does not represent most Americans. It will demonstrate that a country that starts to slide toward autocracy can move back to normalcy, as happened in Hungary this spring. Most important, it will create a desperately needed check on Mr. Trump during his final two years in office. … In a 21-month span, he has done more harm to democracy and the rule of law than any other president in the modern era and perhaps longer than that. He has broken his oath to defend the Constitution by trying to rewrite it on his own. He has refused to honor Congress’s power of the purse and misused national security laws for political ends. He has defied federal court orders on Medicaid funding, deportation orders and more. He has dismantled the Justice Department’s legacy as an impartial enforcer of federal law, turning it into an instrument of retribution against his adversaries while canceling investigations into his allies. He has appointed inept sycophants to oversee crucial government functions, including law enforcement, national defense and public health. He has sought to disenfranchise large numbers of voters, claiming fraud that cannot be found, and championed an extreme new approach to partisan gerrymandering. He has physically besmirched the White House by demolishing the East Wing and financing a garish renovation with donations from wealthy allies.” https://t.co/tsvjIjnOq9
- Sep 2, 20267.4x their median
Someone is going to have to explain to the American people why Trump invited Russia to the G20, why Bessent is blaming Ukraine (this is f*cking nuts!) for high gas prices, all while FT is reporting Russia is secretly helping Iran develop advanced supersonic cruise missiles which will be capable of threatening U.S. aircraft carriers and other warships in the Middle East. Common sense here. This does not add up!
- Sep 17, 20267.1x their median
What’s also amazing is that while Trump quite literally destroys the Kennedy Center, his nephew RFK Jr says nothing. Profile on cowardice. Shameful excuse for a man!
- Oct 25, 20266.4x their median
After being cruelly used by the Ramaswami campaign, Amy Acton’s clearly distressed mother has reportedly been living with her cats in her car in a church parking lot in Pennsylvania. Did the Ramaswami campaign make any effort to improve the plight of this elderly woman they so ruthlessly exploited?
- Aug 31, 20266.4x their median
Please spread the word for midterms, the Trump regime has already slowed down the USPS, here’s what to do: use drop boxes, vote early in person, or mail your ballots at least two weeks before Election Day.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 448K followers, an engagement rate of 0.283%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 8.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 56x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ny17, #txlege.
- What is Amy Siskind's engagement rate on X?
- Amy Siskind (@Amy_Siskind) has an engagement rate of 0.283%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 448,427 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.283%, Amy Siskind sits above the 50th percentile of the 217,857 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Amy_Siskind have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Amy_Siskind post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.