Back to @Andres_Vaca_'s profile

Andrés Vaca engagement report

@Andres_Vaca_ - 367K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.867%
of 367K followers
Per impression
8.30%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
10.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.867%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 8.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrés Vaca's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.867%, Andrés Vaca sits above the 75th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.445% to 2.07%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.445%
p902.07%
p99144.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,299 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 90,063 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.445%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile144.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%58K
02:00 UTC-4%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%82K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%98K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%111K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%96K
19:00 UTC-2%91K
20:00 UTC-1%85K
21:00 UTC-1%75K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%58K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%253K
Monday+1%324K
Tuesday-2%348K
Wednesday-4%309K
Thursday-2%264K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%247K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20263.5x their median

    Pocas veces me ha dado tanto gusto un traspaso como el de Lira al Mónaco. Trabajó sin descanso para cumplir este sueño y, cuando apareció una oferta multimillonaria que habría convencido a muchos, tuvo la valentía de mantenerse firme. No tengo duda de que conquistará Francia.

    11K285599112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.2x their median

    Acá les pregunto ¿Cuáles serían sus tres refuerzos para los Juegos Olímpicos? Yo la tengo clara: Johan, Lira y Quiñones.

    9.7K13636427314K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.7x their median

    Si México Sub-20 vence hoy a Canadá en el Estadio Azteca, asegurará su boleto a los Juegos Olímpicos de Los Ángeles 2028, luego de quedarse fuera de París 2024. Vamooooos 💪🏻

    8.3K97302177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.6x their median

    Que trabajo de Almada con el América. Se ve una idea de juego, están físicamente a tope y le está dando mucha bola a los jóvenes. Mejor inicio imposible: líderes de la Liga MX y de la Leagues Cup.

    8.1K244598106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.4x their median

    Si Lira decide irse a Arabia, me parecerá totalmente respetable. Solo él sabe cuánto le costó llegar hasta ahí, de dónde viene y lo que una oportunidad así puede significar para él y su familia. No solo es ganar más dinero: hablamos de asegurar el futuro de varias generaciones, ayudar a los suyos y cambiar para siempre la historia de su familia.

    7.2K14419314256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.3x their median

    Hablando con gente muy cercana a Lira, me dicen: “No existe una oferta por más grande que sea que vayamos a aceptar de Arabia, MLS o México”. Y créanme cuando les digo MUY cercana.

    7.3K5411714311K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.9x their median

    Que triste lo del fichaje de Lira. Hay que decir que el menos culpable es el Cruz Azul: respetaron los tiempos y acordaron días antes del cierre. Después el manejo fue una lágrima… todo de última hora y con prisas, sumado a la mala suerte del test físico de Balogun. Día triste.

    5.9K13449581K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.9x their median

    A lo largo de su carrera en México, Almada siempre ha potenciado a TODOS sus jugadores. Muchos de los cuales no se espera demasiado. No pudieron haber escogido mejor entrenador en Coapa.

    5.8K11254181K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.7x their median

    Poco se habla del cariño que le tiene Brian Rodríguez al América. Por lo que se dice, se queda.

    5.3K19250357K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.6x their median

    América vs San Diego de la Leagues Cup irá por tele abierta también. Canal 9 y TUDN para todo México. Ahí los esperamos.

    4.9K11892298K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.867%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 8.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

What is Andrés Vaca's engagement rate on X?
Andrés Vaca (@Andres_Vaca_) has an engagement rate of 0.867%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 367,145 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.867%, Andrés Vaca sits above the 75th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Andres_Vaca_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Andres_Vaca_ post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going