Back to @AndrewMayne's profile

Andrew Mayne engagement report

@AndrewMayne - 678K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 678K followers
Per impression
0.204%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
2.02%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 678K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.204% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 4706x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrew Mayne's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Andrew Mayne sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 20264706x their median

    ‘SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY’ has earned $74.5M in domestic previews. Biggest box office preview number OF ALL TIME, passing ‘Avengers: Endgame’. https://t.co/ysBgvU2ZXi

    120K9.5K8781.7K4.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 2026342x their median

    Claude Opus 5 one-shotted this game. EVERYTHING you see in this demo is custom code... not a single external asset was used. AI games are going to be amazing. (sound on)

    7.8K5007785154.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026245x their median

    Good news for anyone with too many tabs: ChatGPT is getting better around the web. 🧩 Chrome extension: In Side Chat, ask about a YouTube video, reference your open tabs, or highlight text on a page and ask away. 💻 Desktop app: Get URL suggestions as you type, revisit your browser history, and choose how it’s managed. Rolling out today.

    6.1K421269120964K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202640x their median

    Why create robot intelligence for just one hand, when we could have it learn from many? GEN-1, our latest embodied foundation model, now supports a broad range of end effectors from 5-finger hands, to specialized tools, and everything in between. https://t.co/ECKlXvARdx

    9161093461297K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20268.5x their median

    A true issue with data centers compared with the light industries of previous Industrial Revolutions is they don’t require many people to run (though building them takes more). It breaks the industry trade-offs between palpable local negative externalities & palpable local gains.

    206821338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20267.3x their median

    In 1986, a group of scientists and futurists gathered to take seriously technologies most people considered science fiction: nanotechnology, machine intelligence, radical life extension, brain-computer interfaces. Forty years later, these aren't fringe ideas. They're the research frontier. This is a short film about Foresight. Where we've been, and where we're going.

    1602941044K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.3x their median

    Most people don't realize MacOS Dictation has become really good. I no longer use a third-party system. Very fast. Very accurate. 100% free on MacOS. It's also the default speech engine in my writing app. This is wonderful news for MacOS devs and users because the cost is zero for high quality local transcription.

    45515015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.9x their median

    Farewell ChatGPT Atlas. You were too good for this world. cc @JustinRYoung and @rushbhatia https://t.co/kuwByAOEtV

    4814118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.8x their median

    What if self-improvement was really a system of control? My new thriller, THE SESSION, follows a paramedic into a psychological empire built on secrets, manipulation, and a vault holding the darkest truths of millions. Coming November 1: https://t.co/hzGZhG8Jk2 https://t.co/8bZdWKQNfq

    2126407.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    I'm helping my dad with his law enforcement autobiography. So many great stories from going after moonshiners to capturing drug cartel hitmen. "And then there was the time I found a stash of weapons the Black Panthers had stolen from the Tuskegee National Guard Armory..." https://t.co/CrMRYVKMzX

    2738112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 678K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.204% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 4706x its own typical post.

What is Andrew Mayne's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Mayne (@AndrewMayne) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 678,329 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Andrew Mayne sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndrewMayne have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndrewMayne post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going