Back to @AndrewYang's profile

Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸 engagement report

@AndrewYang - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
0.291%
58K views on a typical post
Reach
3.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
169
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.57/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 169 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 0.291% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 49% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 152x its own typical post.

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #mtsen.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸 sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 2026152x their median

    As usual I will give my x earnings ($652.58) to someone who likes this post! Winner chosen at random on Sunday. For extra fun if the winner follows @joinnoblemobile I will DOUBLE it and if you are a Noble subscriber I will give you 3 times the amount! Good luck! 😀🎉 https://t.co/OD6TbayvrX

    25K42167413265K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026142x their median

    As usual I will give my x earnings ($488.41) to someone who likes this post! Winner chosen at random on Sunday. For extra fun if the winner follows @joinnoblemobile I will DOUBLE it and if you are a Noble subscriber I will give you FIVE times the amount! Good luck! 😀🎉 https://t.co/XVYrqD727C

    22K58999041490K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202671x their median

    BREAKING: The US economy unexpectedly loses -23,000 jobs in July, well below expectations of +85,000. The unemployment rate fell to 4.1%, below expectations of 4.2%. June's jobs number was also revised down by -37,000 jobs. This marks the 3rd biggest monthly job loss since the pandemic in 2020.

    9.8K1.4K5093542.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202661x their median

    Heard about a small college in the Midwest that has lost 50% of its enrollment in the last 10 years. Hundreds of colleges are going to close in the next decade and it’s going to be devastating for many communities.

    6.9K3482.7K3412.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202632x their median

    Goldman Sachs research reveals that AI is eliminating approximately 16,000 U.S. jobs monthly

    4.4K630271144500K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202531x their median

    Please, put your phone down! @joinnoblemobile https://t.co/y91tkjAEl9

    4.2K5764521221.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202625x their median

    It feels like you have to be remarkable or remarkably lucky now to succeed in America. That’s a very bad feeling. Being decent and hardworking ought to be enough.

    3.4K21950740135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202623x their median

    I actually find AOC’s financial disclosure refreshing.

    3.4K7342815275K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202623x their median

    Hating people you’ve never met is bad for your health.

    3.0K24654473119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202623x their median

    Generation Z has the lowest level of interpersonal trust that we've seen in polling. Just 13% of the youngest adults say that "most people can be trusted." https://t.co/uhq26qI6te

    2.9K3632513491.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mtsen

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 169 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 0.291% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 49% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 152x its own typical post.

What is Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸 (@AndrewYang) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 79 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,756,940 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸 sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndrewYang have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndrewYang post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going