Back to @Angry_Staffer's profile

Angry Staffer engagement report

@Angry_Staffer - 565K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.911%
of 565K followers
Per impression
3.07%
168K views on a typical post
Reach
29.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
81 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 565K followers, an engagement rate of 0.911%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 4,179 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 168K times each, and 3.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maritimesecurity, #marsec.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #maritimesecurity, #marsec.

Compared with accounts its own size

Angry Staffer's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,179 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.911%, Angry Staffer sits above the 75th percentile of the 40,584 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.443% to 2.07%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.443%
p902.07%
p99145.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 40,584 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 91,082 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.443%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile145.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%56K
01:00 UTC-2%57K
02:00 UTC-3%56K
03:00 UTC-4%59K
04:00 UTC-6%48K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%54K
07:00 UTC-4%58K
08:00 UTC-4%68K
09:00 UTC-4%78K
10:00 UTC-3%81K
11:00 UTC-3%88K
12:00 UTC-2%97K
13:00 UTC-2%106K
14:00 UTC-3%109K
15:00 UTC-2%112K
16:00 UTC-3%109K
17:00 UTC-3%102K
18:00 UTC-2%95K
19:00 UTC-2%89K
20:00 UTC-1%83K
21:00 UTC-1%74K
22:00 UTC-1%64K
23:00 UTC-1%57K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%250K
Monday+1%320K
Tuesday-3%340K
Wednesday-4%295K
Thursday-2%259K
Friday-3%271K
Saturday+3%244K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20268.6x their median

    All of these Natalie Harp stories are leaking for one reason: Someone in the West Wing is sick of Harp’s shit. Probably just a coincidence that it’s all happening as Leavitt is leaving.

    39K5.1K458118582K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.6x their median

    🚨BREAKING: President Donald Trump signaled Tuesday he’s willing to declare a national security emergency in an attempt to take over American elections. https://t.co/uosyDUTWN4

    11K5.4K1.6K7471.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.0x their median

    Trump: tariffs don’t raise prices MAGA: yeah! tariffs don’t raise prices, dumb libs Trump: I’m going to suspend tariffs on imported beef to lower prices MAGA: suspending tariffs will lower prices, dumb libs

    13K2.3K9345196K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.9x their median

    Pillow guy lost his primary and Klobuchar won by a million? Please, tell me more about the power of a Trump endorsement

    13K1.3K931198K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    If I had to wager, I’d say Ratcliffe is in Moscow to warn about Russian escalation against Europe/NATO. Linked to U.S. intelligence shared with Poles, Balts and Scandinavians, and comes amid a noticeable uptick in suspected GRU sabotage operations and Russian drone activity. See Germany, Bulgaria, Romania, etc. You don't need DCIA for prisoner swaps. Ratcliffe is also the most pro-Ukraine official in the administration, responsible for helping Kyiv with deep strikes. Context here is important: Bill Burns went to Moscow in 2021 to warn Putin against... invading Ukraine.

    12K2.2K4092461.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.9x their median

    Starting a pointless trade war with our most reliable partner as a distraction from your failed war in Iran (that you launched as a distraction from your administration covering up the Epstein files) isn’t going to win you any votes.

    8.1K1.5K1232877K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.9x their median

    SCOTUS has denied Trump rehearing in E. Jean Carroll case. https://t.co/ZEdzRj0EPY

    8.2K1.3K186115338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Kennedy Center Board, composed of Trump acolytes, is inviting a showdown with Judge Cooper. They vote to add to the building, inscribed, “restored and renovated by Pres Donald J. Trump” below JFK. See you in court!

    5.4K1.2K19029168K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    There’s this really weird thing happening on the right where they’re pretending like Karoline Leavitt was actually a good Press Secretary. They’re all saying the same thing, so I’m assuming they don’t know what a Press Secretary is supposed to do… or they were given a script.

    5.5K6011431581K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Not Dolly :(

    5.3K1541391146K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#maritimesecurity#marsec

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 565K followers, an engagement rate of 0.911%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 4,179 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 168K times each, and 3.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maritimesecurity, #marsec.

What is Angry Staffer's engagement rate on X?
Angry Staffer (@Angry_Staffer) has an engagement rate of 0.911%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 565,478 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.911%, Angry Staffer sits above the 75th percentile of the 40,584 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Angry_Staffer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,179 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Angry_Staffer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going