Angry Staffer engagement report
@Angry_Staffer - 565K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 565K followers, an engagement rate of 0.911%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 4,179 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 168K times each, and 3.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maritimesecurity, #marsec.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #maritimesecurity, #marsec.
Compared with accounts its own size
Angry Staffer's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,179 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.911%, Angry Staffer sits above the 75th percentile of the 40,584 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.443% to 2.07%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.013% |
| 50th percentile | 0.082% |
| 75th percentile | 0.443% |
| 90th percentile | 2.07% |
| 99th percentile | 145.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 56K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 56K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 59K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 48K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 47K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 07:00 UTC | -4% | 58K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 68K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 78K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 106K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 109K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 112K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 109K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 95K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 83K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 64K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 250K |
| Monday | +1% | 320K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 340K |
| Wednesday | -4% | 295K |
| Thursday | -2% | 259K |
| Friday | -3% | 271K |
| Saturday | +3% | 244K |
Best tweets
- Aug 19, 20268.6x their median
All of these Natalie Harp stories are leaking for one reason: Someone in the West Wing is sick of Harp’s shit. Probably just a coincidence that it’s all happening as Leavitt is leaving.
- Aug 11, 20263.6x their median
🚨BREAKING: President Donald Trump signaled Tuesday he’s willing to declare a national security emergency in an attempt to take over American elections. https://t.co/uosyDUTWN4
- Aug 22, 20263.0x their median
Trump: tariffs don’t raise prices MAGA: yeah! tariffs don’t raise prices, dumb libs Trump: I’m going to suspend tariffs on imported beef to lower prices MAGA: suspending tariffs will lower prices, dumb libs
- Aug 12, 20262.9x their median
Pillow guy lost his primary and Klobuchar won by a million? Please, tell me more about the power of a Trump endorsement
- Aug 25, 20262.8x their median
If I had to wager, I’d say Ratcliffe is in Moscow to warn about Russian escalation against Europe/NATO. Linked to U.S. intelligence shared with Poles, Balts and Scandinavians, and comes amid a noticeable uptick in suspected GRU sabotage operations and Russian drone activity. See Germany, Bulgaria, Romania, etc. You don't need DCIA for prisoner swaps. Ratcliffe is also the most pro-Ukraine official in the administration, responsible for helping Kyiv with deep strikes. Context here is important: Bill Burns went to Moscow in 2021 to warn Putin against... invading Ukraine.
- Aug 24, 20261.9x their median
Starting a pointless trade war with our most reliable partner as a distraction from your failed war in Iran (that you launched as a distraction from your administration covering up the Epstein files) isn’t going to win you any votes.
- Aug 17, 20261.9x their median
SCOTUS has denied Trump rehearing in E. Jean Carroll case. https://t.co/ZEdzRj0EPY
- Aug 13, 2026
Kennedy Center Board, composed of Trump acolytes, is inviting a showdown with Judge Cooper. They vote to add to the building, inscribed, “restored and renovated by Pres Donald J. Trump” below JFK. See you in court!
- Aug 13, 2026
There’s this really weird thing happening on the right where they’re pretending like Karoline Leavitt was actually a good Press Secretary. They’re all saying the same thing, so I’m assuming they don’t know what a Press Secretary is supposed to do… or they were given a script.
- Aug 25, 2026
Not Dolly :(
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 565K followers, an engagement rate of 0.911%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 4,179 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 168K times each, and 3.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maritimesecurity, #marsec.
- What is Angry Staffer's engagement rate on X?
- Angry Staffer (@Angry_Staffer) has an engagement rate of 0.911%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 565,478 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.911%, Angry Staffer sits above the 75th percentile of the 40,584 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Angry_Staffer have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,179 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Angry_Staffer post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.