Back to @Baabarniitlelch's profile

Baabar engagement report

@Baabarniitlelch - 275K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.033%
of 275K followers
Per impression
1.33%
6.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
90
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 92x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Baabar's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.033%, Baabar sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,169 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,169 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,723 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 441 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 23, 202692x their median

    除了剔的好,这羊肉也好啊 https://t.co/GSPzwnxU7P

    7.3K513359943.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202634x their median

    ❤️ 🇺🇦 Ах какой чудный ИИ клип Скорпионс Ветер перемен. Визуализация нашей мечты. https://t.co/7WWMwm35Hb

    2.3K4652613673K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.8x their median

    😱😱🤐This is exactly why you ALWAYS keep your dog on a leash near wild ocean shores.🫢🫢 That seal moved so fast—nature is completely unpredictable. 😟😟 https://t.co/D27EjSlO6n

    3257021987281K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20267.3x their median

    Зоригийг хөнөөсөний дараа алуурчны үс олдсон. Тэр үед нь ДНХ-г судлуулахаар хэд хэдэн орон руу гадагш нь дээж явуулсан боловч үсний уг байхгүй учраас тодорхойлох боломжгүй гэсэн хариу ирсэн. 24 оны сонгуулийн өмнө Зоригийг хөнөөсөн асуудал дахин босож бараг л Элбэгдорж захиалга өгч Бат-Үүл алсан шахам бөөн суртал нэвтрүүлэг явсан ба 3 шатны шүүхээр орж ял авсан алуурчдыг сулласан. Тэр үеэс мөнөөх уггүй үсийг Америкт шинэ технологиор ДНХ-г уншуулсан, хариу нь ирсэн, алуурчин гэгдэх хэлмэгдсэн хоёрын ДНХ-тай таарахгүй байна, эзэн нь тодорхой болчихоод гадагш зугтсан байна гэсэн мэдээллийг Цагдаагийн газрын эх сурвалжтайгаар олон удаа мэдээллийн хэрэгслэлээр тараасан. Мэргэжлийн хүний хувьд хэлэхэд хумс, үсэнд их бодож ДНХ-ийн тасархайнууд байдаг учир лав өнөөгийн шинжлэх ухааны төвшинд тодорхойлох бололцоогүй. Цагдаа ийм хуурамч мэдээлэл тараасан нь алуурчдын хэргийг хэрэгсэхгүй болгох, улмаар байр саваар шагнах зэрэг нь зориудын үйлдлийн цуврал зөвтгөл болсон. Одоо талийгчийг хэн хөнөөв гэдэг талаас биш, алуурчдыг хэн суллав гэдэг талаас нь мөрдөн шалгалт явуулбал хэргийн жинхэнэ эзэд тодрох гигуртай санагдана.

    48115813138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20266.1x their median

    Овоо хөгжөөд явж байсан чинь 2012 онд Занданшатар, Бямбацогт нар, 2013 онд Алтанхуяг нар эрх барьж байхдаа сүйрлийн эхийг тавьсан ба 2016 оноос МАН бүр хөмрүүлсэн гэдгийг та ч харлаа, би ч харлаа

    38814212313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.0x their median

    АН зөвдөж байсныг би сандаггүйм. Бүгдэд нь паспорт өгье, малаа хувьчлъя, Байр хувьчлана, хэлмэгдлийн нөхөнолговор, банкны реформ, өмч хувьчлал, хүүхдийн мөнгө, инфляц буулгав, бүгд хараал иднэ. МАН юм хийгээгүй ч, буруу хийсэн ч, идэж уусан ч, сонгууль булхайцсан ч зөвдөнө.

    3151211129.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20264.7x their median

    За битгий худлаа шаагаад бай. Эрдэнэтийг Чехийн геологчид 1966 онд нээгээд тэнд уурхай байгуулахаар болсон. 1968 онд Орос цэрэг Чехийг түрэмгийлсэн. 1969 онд Чехүүд Монголын геологоос татгалзаж байгаагаа илэрхийлсэн. 1970 онд Оросууд оронд нь авах болсноо илэрхийлсэн. 1971 онд Бухарестэд болсон ЭЗХТЗ-ийн чуулганаар Монголыг геологоо хөгжүүлэх даалгавар өгсөн. Ингэж Эрдэнэт эхэлсэн. Цааш нь ярьвал зөндөө юм бий. 1980 онд Эрдэнэт ашиглалт орсноор улс төсвөөсөө 40-60 сая төгрөг жил бүр өгдөг болж бүр ядуурсан. Үүнийг эсэргүүцэж оростой ярихаар Моломжамц, Батмөнх, Содном, Мишигдорж тэргүүтнүүд тогтсоныг Филатова Бал нар мэдээд бүгдийг нь хусах гэж байсан. Чухам үүнээс болж Москва Громыко өөрийг нь зайлуулсан. Ил болсон ном уншиж бай. Нууц мэдээлэл биш.

    28412111318K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.5x their median

    Яг үнэндээ барилга байшин нурааж сөнөөсний 100 жил юм шүү дээ. Хэдийгээр нүүдэлчид ч гэсэн Гадаад Монголыг 1921 онд Ардын намд хүлээлгэж өгөхөд 798 сүм хийдийн 6 мянга 500 барилга байшинтай байжээ. Нураасаар 1938 он гэхэд Гандангийн ганц хоёр байшин, түүний дотор Жанрайсаг, Чойжи ламын сүм, Дамбадаржаагийн ганц байшин, Хархорины нурааж дийлээгүй бас нэг байшин үлдсэн. Эдгээр нь зөвлөлтийн цэрэг, ажлын газар гэсэн зориулалтаар нураалгүй үлдээжээ.

    26911913513K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.3x their median

    Ц.Даваасүрэн: Багануурын станцын тусгай зөвшөөрлийг цуцалсан шийдвэрийг гаргаад ирвэл би маргааш ч хамаагүй ажлаа өгөөд яваад өгье‼️ "Багануурын станцыг зогсоо гэж Жэнко шаардсан учраас би тэгсэн" гэж саяхан ярьсан бичлэг нь бийшдээ

    2601199014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.3x their median

    Эд ХЭЛМЭГДЭГЧИД БИШ. Эд ХЯДЛАГЫН ЗОЛИОС. https://t.co/lpmRySjdNH

    2731057111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 92x its own typical post.

What is Baabar's engagement rate on X?
Baabar (@Baabarniitlelch) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 274,665 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.033%, Baabar sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,169 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Baabarniitlelch have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Baabarniitlelch post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going