Back to @Breedlove22's profile

Robert ₿reedlove engagement report

@Breedlove22 - 455K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 455K followers
Per impression
1.18%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
196
interactions (median)
Saved
0.15%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 455K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robert ₿reedlove's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Robert ₿reedlove sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026141x their median

    Shopify billionaire co-founder & CEO Tobi Lütke — one of the most analytically rigorous founders alive — uses affirmations. His exact words: "If you tell yourself or write down something about yourself 100 times, it writes into the neurofrontal cortex at such a deep level that your brain will start reconciling you to that. It just works." His personal example: He was terrified of public speaking. For one week he sat down every day for 10 minutes and wrote: "I love public speaking." A week later the fear was gone. "It's not like a placebo. You just actively change your neurofrontal cortex in this moment." Your brain starts shaping your behavior around the identity you rehearse most.

    25K2.6K2652854.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202615x their median

    Axis Arashi Breedlove: welcome to the world son 🙏🏼 https://t.co/1pqf2oxEye

    2.7K23264375K viewsView on X
  • Mar 26, 20267.8x their median

    My name is Robert Breedlove.   I just turned 40 and have built a life that I love. To build this life, I used some powerful tools. Three of the most important tools I’ve used are: Hard Money, Hard Facts, and a Hard Body. To build a life that you love, you too must develop your own tools, and mastery over them. This is where I can help you. These tools form the three pillars of my new personal brand:   - Hard Money: For almost twenty years, I’ve been a student of money. I will teach you about the nature of money and its influence on human beings, which will help you unplug your mind from the matrix, and perhaps make more money as a result. Through the study of money, you will support your own mental, spiritual, and financial freedom.   - Hard Facts: For over twenty years, I’ve read roughly one book each week. I will share the deep insights I’ve gleaned from science, philosophy, and other non-fiction books. I will also tell you some stories about the many life lessons I’ve learned along the way…   - Hard Body: For almost thirty years, I’ve trained my body like an athlete. I will share every detail of my fitness lifestyle including all my peptide, anabolic, nutrition, training, sleep, and recovery protocols. Optimal health is a key component of true wealth.   Since I was a kid, I’ve always wanted to have it all. To excel in every domain of life: to be successful financially, to be highly intelligent, and to be in top physical form. Now that I’m 40, I want to help men like me who live their lives in pursuit of excellence.   As I’ve grown into manhood, the pain of life’s many ups and downs has showed me the great value of philosophy: the process of learning to love wisdom, and learning to love wisely. I have spent years studying the teachings of wise men who have walked before us. I will share my insights from my studies, and from my years of struggles seeking love and wisdom.   Inspired by the teachings history’s many wise men, and motivated by the #Bitcoin mission, I am committed to sharing all aspects of my life which might be valuable to you. In the ethos of open-source, my aim is to tell it all, regardless of how embarrassing or painful it is for me to share. Wisdom comes from our wounds, and sunlight is the best disinfectant.   We all want to live a life we love. My aim is to help men who wish to pursue excellence in life’s many domains. Follow me for effective methods to get rich, to get smart, and to get ripped. And maybe along the way, you’ll find some nuggets of wisdom for yourself, too.   Your attention is valuable to me, and I’ll do my best to draw it to things valuable to you.   In doing so, I hope to help you build a life you love, too. Stay strong brothers 💪🏼

    1.3K602037171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.0x their median

    This is what Elon Musk understands about money that nobody else talks about: https://t.co/K7e0EuREuR

    933161611551K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20264.5x their median

    If you make over $250K a year, your single biggest bill every year is your taxes (often $60K to $100K+). Here's the completely legal strategy that wealthy people like Donald Trump use to shrink it to almost zero (THREAD):

    80148322270K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.0x their median

    Everyone keeps asking about my experience with fat loss peptides. So at 40, here's every one I've tested, with the results and side effects each gave me (A THREAD): 1. Retatrutide https://t.co/6dRscMW1rq

    31618518231K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20262.0x their median

    I suffered from leaky gut for almost 10 years. In this thread I'll break down everything that fixed it, from diet to habits to peptides (so if you suffer from it, read to the end): https://t.co/FJnX2wZwfB

    33120341222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.8x their median

    Someone breaks into your house, puts a gun to your head and demands your Bitcoin. You physically can't hand it over. That's what proper custody looks like, and it's why one of the most radical ideas in Bitcoin is that it could bring silence to systemic violence. Bitcoin won't stop crimes of passion. But no man is better than his incentives, and the uncomfortable truth is that crime does pay. You can acquire assets through stealing and extortion, and physical property is what makes that profitable. Gold in your closet can be seized by any man willing to threaten you for it. Bitcoin is the first non-physical property that can be directly owned, which makes it far harder to seize by force. Domain names came close, but a centralized third party controls them, so they can be seized by legal coercion. Bitcoin has no third party to coerce. Hold your own keys and you hold a bearer asset, like gold coins that aren't physically there. Ownership comes down to keeping a secret. That secret only protects you if you custody it properly. Write your private key (the password to your coins) on paper and lock it in a safe, and you've turned non-physical property back into physical property, seizable like the gold. Multi-key solves this. Picture the nuclear launch scene, men with briefcases handcuffed to their wrists, 2 or 3 keys turned together in sequence before anything fires. You can hold Bitcoin the same way. Break the private key into 3 pieces, or 5, or 7, called shards, and require a simple majority to move funds, 2 of 3 or 3 of 5, in a sequence you designate. Then distribute them across your circle of trust. Your accountant holds one, your lawyer another, you hold the third. Nothing moves without you, so you keep full control, and you gain redundancy, since losing one shard still leaves 2 of 3 between you and your accountant. Which brings it back to the gun. You can't hand over what you can't move. Pre-designate a safe word with your key holders, and when the thief forces you to call them, that word tells them to refuse. It's a custody schema as immune to coercion as anything you'll ever get, and it's what we trust with nuclear launch codes. In a Bitcoinized multi-key world, crime pays less. Even warfare becomes less profitable, and therefore less prevalent, thanks to Bitcoin. Bitcoin lowers the profitability of force, and humans do whatever is profitable, so the businesses built on force thin out. There are only two ways to acquire wealth. Making, where you produce and trade by consent, or taking, where you seize by force what makers have built. Bitcoin tilts the landscape of human action toward making.

    2922837455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Other than 21M, you can only expect the unexpected with Bitcoin.

    2601413115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    I turned 40 this year. Here are 40 lessons I would tell my 20 year old self to unf*ck my money, body, and entire life (THREAD): 1. The definition of a loser is one who does not learn...

    2382911574K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 455K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

What is Robert ₿reedlove's engagement rate on X?
Robert ₿reedlove (@Breedlove22) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 455,249 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Robert ₿reedlove sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Breedlove22 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Breedlove22 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going