Brendan Schaub engagement report
@BrendanSchaub - 740K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 647 interactions against 740K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 0.861% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #ufc330.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brendan Schaub's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.087%, Brendan Schaub sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Jun 30, 202630x their median
Elliot Page reveals shredded new look Says he's "hooked" to boxing (via https://t.co/z3nuKJk9Uo) https://t.co/xhTQQPchop
- Aug 8, 202624x their median
Dana White explains why they didn’t have ring card girls at the Zuffa Boxing event in Dublin “The UK won’t use ring card girls unless you have ring card boys.” 😭 (via @Ninadrama) https://t.co/h7O0D4Q99k
- Aug 11, 202611x their median
Abdul El-Sayed says American football represents toxic masculinity. https://t.co/pw49aqXshl
- Jun 24, 20268.9x their median
New: Joe Rogan is extremely concerned with comedian Tim Dillon that Christianity is being attacked by tech companies who are creating a digital AI god that people will be forced to worship in order to survive: ROGAN: “Elon Musk just said AI is going to be 1,000,000 times smarter than the smartest human that’s ever lived.” DILLION: “AI is going to cause financial instability for a massive amount of people. There’s going to be so many people without a job.” ROGAN: “Their goal is to create a digital God. It won’t be controlled by the people. It’s going to be ran by a select group of elites. It’s very weird that we’re just trusting them.” DILLON: “None of these people at the top want you to be able to own a home. They’re telling us you don’t need a house, you’re not getting a house, and forget about any ideas you ever had about owning a house. It’s the same with healthcare. There’s no real movement to give anyone healthcare in America.” ROGAN: “Tech companies have more power than any company ever. They have robot armies and AI.” DILLON: “These are very creepy AI companies. Anthropic is a CREEPY company.” ROGAN: “We learned during the pandemic if you get people scared enough they will back down and comply with a lot of dumb ideas.” DILLON: “They’ll trust the government.” ROGAN: “It’s insane that it’s now the people on the left who trust the government.”
- Aug 16, 20268.6x their median
Ian Garry spoke after the loss to Islam Makhachev: "Tonight wasn't my night. Islam was just better than me tonight and that's okay. I just fought arguably the greatest fighter we've ever seen, and I pushed him to the f*cking wire. I'm so proud of myself." (via @iangarryMMA) https://t.co/UU25kqNsAF
- Aug 16, 20265.4x their median
Islam won tonight no doubt but for the first time in a long time he looked human inside that octagon. Micheal Morales is gonna be a BIG problem. #ufc330
- Jul 12, 20264.7x their median
Well…pure disbelief in the main event last night. I refused to accept Conor was injured and kept saying he slipped 🤦🏻 It’s over ladies and gentleman. https://t.co/dU1Zo2zdtv
- Aug 16, 20263.5x their median
Ian Garry would have won if he ate a steak. 🥩 #ufc330
- Jul 12, 20263.4x their median
Well, last night sucked. We were all hoping for an unbelievable 5 yr layoff Hollywood ending. Unfortunately, this isn’t a movie it’s real life and sports at the highest level. Conor’s run was special. What a ride. That being said the ride is over. #UFC329
- Jul 10, 20263.2x their median
Drake just announced he's bet $1 MILLION on Conor McGregor to beat Max Holloway this weekend 👀 "THE MAC IS BACK?!?!?? The proper twelve drinking, tailored suit wearing, Lambo Yacht riding man with the Dubai tan that once had both belts in both hands…Say less." The payout is $2.85 MILLION 🤑
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 647 interactions against 740K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 0.861% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.
- What is Brendan Schaub's engagement rate on X?
- Brendan Schaub (@BrendanSchaub) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 740,164 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.087%, Brendan Schaub sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BrendanSchaub have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BrendanSchaub post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.