Back to @BrettFavre's profile

Brett Favre engagement report

@BrettFavre - 444K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
4.17%
of 444K followers
Per impression
3.11%
595K views on a typical post
Reach
134.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
19K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
240 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 19K interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 4.17%. Posts are seen about 595K times each, and 3.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 134.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 4.17%, Brett Favre sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.10% to 159.8%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    Texas is the prize. Don’t ever forget it. James Talarico has a billionaire backed political machine trying to turn the biggest conservative stronghold in America BLUE. Reid Hoffman alone put $10 MILLION behind a super PAC supporting him. They know exactly what happens if Texas falls. The political map changes, the culture changes, and the left gets the crown jewel it has wanted for decades. @elonmusk came to Texas to BUILD, innovate and escape the same suffocating politics they want to bring here. Don’t hand them the keys to the Lone Star State. Show up. Fight for Texas. Vote Ken Paxton. KEEP TEXAS RED.

    22K7.8K1.0K212523K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    🚨 UPDATE: Senate Leader John Thune says it's time to attack Democrats and make the SAVE America Act a campaign issue, rather than criticize Senate Republicans — Fox "Our message ought to be why the Democrats are completely out of step with the American people and why we need to elect more Republicans so we can do things like the SAVE America Act." "I think the base can be plenty motivated by other issues, and particularly by the president getting out there on the campaign trail and telling them why it's important that they elect Republicans to the Senate." This comes after Thune a couple weeks ago said: "How about we make it about them!" "Seems to me I'm the only one who can count to 50. We don't have the votes."

    2.1K6432.5K386666K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 19K interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 4.17%. Posts are seen about 595K times each, and 3.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 134.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Brett Favre's engagement rate on X?
Brett Favre (@BrettFavre) has an engagement rate of 4.17%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 443,591 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 4.17%, Brett Favre sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BrettFavre have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @BrettFavre post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going