Back to @BurgessOwens's profile

Burgess Owens engagement report

@BurgessOwens - 367K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.22%
of 367K followers
Per impression
6.27%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
19.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.305%
217 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 4.5K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 1.22%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 6.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 9.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Burgess Owens's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.22%, Burgess Owens sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20269.7x their median

    🔥 BOOM: SEC. SCOTT BESSENT JUST MIC DROPPED ELIZABETH WARREN, after she pretended to know more than him about finance "I recommend Senator Warren take any entry level course in international finance for her and her staff, or I can personally give her a tutorial on Foreign Exchange for Dummies." "Although I am not holding my breath, I hope her next letter will demonstrate that she has learned the difference between a currency purchase and a swap or a loan." "She knows even less about foreign exchange markets than she does about banking." Bessent never misses 🫳🏻🎤 Don't test him!

    35K7.0K729232398K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.8x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just DROPPED THE MOST DEVASTATING TRUTH BOMB of the year — and the establishment is TERRIFIED. Listen carefully: “When you take the illegals out of the workforce… working class wages GO UP.” “When you send them back home? Rents GO DOWN.” This isn’t theory. This isn’t politics. This is pure ECONOMIC REALITY. Mass deportations don’t just secure the border… They RAISE your paycheck. They LOWER your rent. They FIX the affordability crisis that’s crushing American families. One policy. Almost EVERYTHING solved. The elites never wanted you to hear this. Now the whole country is hearing it loud and clear. 🇺🇸🔥 Watch. Share. Wake people up.

    8.5K3.5K203123179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.7x their median

    🚨 Trump just delivered the MOST triggering post on 𝕏. MAGA gets the White House Ballroom. AMEN https://t.co/qEeRBGYLyT

    9.9K2.1K1812370K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.3x their median

    🚨 RFK JR. JUST EXPLAINED WHY AMERICAN FOOD IS DIFFERENT. Europe: about 400 legal ingredients. America: FDA doesn’t even know. They said somewhere between 4,000 and 12,000. How? A 1948 loophole. “Generally Recognized As Safe.” It was meant for salt, yeast, vinegar. The food industry hijacked it. Every new chemical got STAMPED safe by the company that makes it. No study. No list. Agency captured. RFK: we’re CLOSING that loophole. If Europe can ban it, America shouldn’t be feeding it to kids.

    7.2K2.7K11976124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    🚨 NOW: HHS Sec. Bobby Kennedy declares WAR on Big Food capturing his agency, says the GRAS loophole is OFFICIALLY CLOSING — which allowed manufacturers to "self-certify" CHEMICALS without FDA review WE LOVE BOBBY! 🇺🇸 American food ingredients: UP TO 12,000 Europe: 400 — "Everything else is ILLEGAL" 🤯 "If something is generally recognized as safe, GRAS, generally recognized as safe. If companies don't have to do a safety study, the food industry captured my agency — FDA — and they hijacked that loophole and turned it so that every ingredient gets stamped at GRAS, self-affirm!" "We don't even know what ingredients are in our food. When I came in, I asked FDA how many ingredients do we have in our food? And they said, we don't really know, it's between 4,000 and 12,000, we think it's about 10,000. In Europe, there's only 400 ingredients and everything else is illegal." "And so, it was, that is really its agency capture, it's the corruption of the regulatory system by private interest, and that's the answer to your question." "And we are now closing the GRAS loophole."

    3.2K1.1K787371K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Dalilah, a 5-year-old from California, was in a coma for 3 weeks because an illegal alien driving an 18-wheeler crashed into her family's car. Sanctuary state California gave the illegal alien a CDL. And it's giving thousands of other illegal aliens CDLs too. Watch Dalilah's father, Marcus Coleman, tell their family's story ⬇️

    1.6K498483762K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    VP Vance was asked about the ongoing tariff negotiations with Canada, and what he’d say to Maine businesses and consumers worried about the impact of those tariffs. His answer was 🔥🔥🔥 "Well, first of all, I’d say we’re very mindful of the fact that Maine is a border state with Canada. There’s a lot of cross-border transaction between Maine and Canada. And what we’re trying to do here is just make sure that Maine actually gets a fair deal. If you look at the amount of tariffs that have been applied not just on Maine but on a lot of our northern states that are doing cross-border trade with Canada, Canada and China have been the two worst countries when it comes to trade policy anywhere in the world. What a shame that is. China, you, of course, expect. They’re our biggest economic competitor. I would expect that from China. I would not expect that from Canada. We have to remember, Canada is a state—sorry, Freudian slip. That was actually an accident. 🤣🤣🤣 Canada is a country that has underinvested in its military that quite literally would get invaded by a foreign country were it not for the umbrella of protection provided by the United States of America. And so how does Canada actually respond to that? By treating the people of Maine fairly? No. They apply ridiculous tariffs and other non-tariff duties on Maine products coming into Canada, and they don’t expect Maine or anybody else to fight back. We’re sick of that. We are actually going to fight back against unfair trade practices whether it’s coming from China or Canada. Now, let me just give you a very, very simple and concrete example. If you buy dairy, cheese, butter, milk that comes from Canada into Maine, you probably are buying a product that has 0% tariffs on it. And by the way, if Canada applied 0%, that would be one thing. But you know, if a Maine farmer sends dairy products into Canada, they could be paying as much as a 250% tariff. Now, how is it fair to the farmers of Maine that they pay 250% when the Canadian farmers pay nothing? That unfairness is something that we just have to fix. And here’s what happened with the most recent round of negotiations. They’re still ongoing, and I want to be respectful of the process. But we know that Canada allows itself to be used as a backdoor for Chinese goods. They treat Chinese goods more fairly than they do the goods that come from the people of Maine. It’s insanity. And what we’ve said to Canada is stop it. Apply a basic principle of fairness to the trade that you’re doing between North Dakota and Canada, between Maine and Canada. And what happened at the very end is they came in with a bunch of unreasonable last-minute demands. I frankly thought we had a deal. I think that we should have a deal. But I think that we need to send a message loud and clear to the Prime Minister of Canada. STOP taking advantage of the people of Maine. Stop taking advantage of America. It’s over. We expect fairness in our trade policy." WELL SAID!

    1.7K29113223189K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    🚨Good News: The U.S. Postal Service has finalized a rule requiring states using USPS for federal mail-in ballots to: 1. Provide USPS with a list of voters receiving ballots 2. Use unique serialized barcodes on outgoing and return envelopes 3. Provide ballot-tracking information If a state refuses to comply, USPS would not transmit its federal mail ballots.

    66214127636K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    I watched the community I love lose everything, an inch at a time, to a cultural enemy welcomed inside the gate. I will not stand by and watch that happen to the state my grandchildren will inherit. https://t.co/KkRQNRlbpB

    1102819917K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    This is exciting news.. the possibility of accountability for these WOKE institutions’ DEI discrimination against Asian American students. Next Question: how many international students, including Chinese citizens, were accepted because they pay CASH upfront? https://t.co/01KB2CxRbi

    170204.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.5K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 1.22%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 6.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 9.7x its own typical post.

What is Burgess Owens's engagement rate on X?
Burgess Owens (@BurgessOwens) has an engagement rate of 1.22%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 367,292 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.22%, Burgess Owens sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BurgessOwens have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BurgessOwens post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going