CNET engagement report
@CNET - 2.9M followers on X
Measured over 261 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 261 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 261 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #unboxing, #cnetdeals, #firstlook.
Measured over 261 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #unboxing, #cnetdeals, #firstlook.
Compared with accounts its own size
CNET's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, CNET sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 15, 20265.4x their median
Some users are already joking that the new logo reads "Instagzam." https://t.co/88Lvi3dtkY https://t.co/D6cUpEAtkb
- Aug 19, 20265.1x their median
AI Pro and Ultra subscribers will also have access to Google’s agentic AI auto browsing feature. https://t.co/VmXdwvHqWW https://t.co/IVbPqs9yOq
- Aug 28, 20264.8x their median
CNET’s lead wearables reporter Vanessa Hand Orellana says the Pixel Watch 5’s new workout builder fills a key gap in AI coaching. Check it out now - https://t.co/nrTG9TsUdV #Unboxing #AllThingsMobile https://t.co/RZBonr4B46
- Aug 23, 20264.6x their median
Insta360's new Snap accessory makes using your phone's rear camera easier. This 7.85mm ultra-thin portable monitor features a built-in light, protective cover, and wired connectivity. Grab it here: https://t.co/kJul4GcPqC #Unboxing #AllThingsMobile #FirstLook https://t.co/b38dBFSb9X
- Aug 27, 20264.5x their median
CNET's initial impression was that Windows 95 would have a major impact, thanks to features like long file names, the taskbar and the Recycle Bin. Explore this vintage review. https://t.co/a1me55IeHo
- Aug 21, 20264.5x their median
The new iOS 27 Shortcuts make it easy to program your own iPhone tricks with natural language. @BridgetCarey explains how she used it to wean her from compulsively opening social media and getting lost in scrolling. https://t.co/JDF6LXENr2
- Aug 21, 20264.5x their median
There are now more rumors about Apple's next flagship phones that point to a new foldable, a variable aperture camera, more RAM, improved battery life and, yes, higher prices. https://t.co/IMjHjqUsoy https://t.co/DCdwWIQnt5
- Aug 12, 20264.5x their median
We’re on the ground and reporting live at @Google’s #MadebyGoogle event. Follow our live blog for the latest: https://t.co/yXKIJXWYuE https://t.co/e2um7mzKJB
- Aug 22, 20264.3x their median
Summer is officially here. ☀️ Sony released their latest flagship headphones in the sandstone colorway to ring in the summer. Check it out now: https://t.co/MShrLCvzdq #Unboxing #AllThingsMobile #FirstLook https://t.co/XkwfbQQPHw
- Aug 16, 20264.3x their median
Commentary: The Pixel 11 has less RAM, gimmicky features and is more expensive. https://t.co/yUiZaRKdqr https://t.co/BsA5ivjkzh
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 261 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 261 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #unboxing, #cnetdeals, #firstlook.
- What is CNET's engagement rate on X?
- CNET (@CNET) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 261 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,927,365 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, CNET sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CNET have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CNET post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.7 posts per day across the measured window.