Community Notes & Violations engagement report
@CNviolations - 1.2M followers on X
Measured over 545 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 141 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 27.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 545 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 640K interactions, about 4542x its own typical post.
Measured over 545 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #breaking.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.012%, Community Notes & Violations sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,501 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 99% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 91 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 13, 20264542x their median
https://t.co/TIe1amthSy
- Oct 3, 20263233x their median
https://t.co/ijjlvYpMeq
- Sep 10, 20262725x their median
Wife told me these wouldn’t fit. Little did she know I had trained for this moment for years. https://t.co/nAmEXQCaoJ
- Sep 9, 20261309x their median
leaving milk and cookies out for erika kirk tonight
- Oct 1, 20261139x their median
https://t.co/oIe6wJv9Gs
- Oct 8, 20261092x their median
"incorrect username or password" BITCH, WHICH ONE IS IT!!!!! https://t.co/6Bzyz2sCun
- Sep 11, 20261050x their median
Just had the creepiest scam ever happen 20 minutes ago. I got a call from my wife telling me she forgot her wallet and needed the credit card to pay for her gas. Except my wife was at home with me, and drives a Tesla. Same voice, bit... off, weird cadence but 100% sounded just like her. If she wasn't there, and it wasn't about gas I would have fallen for it. I entertained it for awhile to get more out of it, I was so confused. Must be some sort of voice deepfake. The responses were too fast for ai, I think it was a voice filter. I wish I had thought to record it. The future is about to get fucked. Warn your loved ones, do verbal passwords with your kids. Bit taken aback
- Sep 17, 2026708x their median
Feminists in 2026: https://t.co/mpa2V8u4oe
- Sep 23, 2026647x their median
2025: Together. 2026: A reminder that life can change in ways we never expect. 💔🥺 https://t.co/donDpNQoy3
- Oct 21, 2026600x their median
A girl was doing a live stream and her cat started reading the chat https://t.co/W6FcfZM1Li
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 141 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 27.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 545 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 640K interactions, about 4542x its own typical post.
- What is Community Notes & Violations's engagement rate on X?
- Community Notes & Violations (@CNviolations) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 545 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,179,240 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.012%, Community Notes & Violations sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,501 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CNviolations have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @CNviolations post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 27.1 posts per day across the measured window.