Catherine Herridge engagement report
@C__Herridge - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.45%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 122K times each, and 3.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 38% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Catherine Herridge's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.45%, Catherine Herridge sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 155.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Feb 24, 202516x their median
BREAKING: Doctor Targeted by Biden DOJ After Blowing The Whistle on ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care For Minors at Texas Children’s Hospital Breaks Silence After All Charges Dropped; Calls on Trump Administration/DOJ to Investigate His Case “I was willing to go to jail” 00:00 Introduction 02:00 Reaction - Criminal Case Dismissed 04:20 All I Wanted Was To Hold My Baby 04:40 What Accountability Looks Like 06:40 Whistleblower Story Goes Viral 09:30 Retaliation 10:40 Biden DOJ/Alleged Threats 12:00 HHS Memo 13:50 Target Letter 15:15 Three Indictments 16:10 DOJ Errors 18:10 Darkest Moment 19:50 Gag Order 21:40 X Lifeline 22:20 Calls on Trump Administration/DOJ to Investigate his case 23:20 Responses Subscriptions @C__Herridge support independent journalism. Subscribe today!
- Apr 1, 202514x their median
BREAKING: FBI Imposed “Gag Order” About Hunter Biden Laptop After Employee Accidentally Confirmed Its Authenticity To Twitter Newly released internal FBI chat messages reveal senior bureau officials actively shutting down discussion of the laptop’s credibility days before the 2020 Presidential election This is a CatherineHerridgeReports @C__Herridge / Public @Shellenberger Joint Investigation An FBI official admitted to House investigators that an FBI employee had inadvertently confirmed the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop to Twitter on a conference call the morning of October 14, 2020, the day the New York Post published a story about it. “I recall that when the question came up, an intelligence analyst assigned to the Criminal Investigative Division said something to the effect of, ‘Yes, the laptop is real’,” the then Russia unit chief testified in a closed door transcribed interview. “I believe it was an (Office of General Counsel) attorney assigned to the (Foreign Influence Task Force) stepped in and said, ‘We will not comment further on this topic.’” For the first time, and with a change of administration, the FBI has now turned over to GOP House investigators the internal chat messages that show Bureau leadership actively silenced its employees. The FBI, which had a special task force to counter foreign election interference, could have set the record straight by confirming the laptop was real and the subject of an ongoing criminal probe. Instead, FBI leadership allowed the false narrative about the laptop to gain momentum. The FBI provided the chat messages to congressional investigators with heavy redactions. Some of the redactions on the chats are marked “OGC AGC,” which appears to mean that they were made by the FBI’s Office of General Counsel and Associate General Counsel. An individual whose name is blacked out, tells Elvis M. Chan, the San Francisco-based FBI special agent tasked with interacting with social media companies, there was a “gag order” on discussion of Hunter Biden’s laptop. In a separate exchange, Chan is told “official response no commen(t).” In the chat, the FBI officials showed awareness that the laptop may have contained evidence of criminal activity. Asked Chan, “actually what kind of case is the laptop thing? corruption? campaign financing?” Another FBI employee responds, “CLOSE HOLD —” after which the response is redacted. To which Chan responds, “oh crap” appearing to underscore the serious nature of the probe, which included felony tax charges. Chan adds, “ok. It ends here”. In the same conversation, Chan is asked if “Anyone discussing that NYPost article on the Biden’s?” Chan responds, “yes we are. c d confirmed an active investigation. No further comment.” “C D” is likely shorthand for the FBI’s Criminal Division. Said another FBI employee, whose name was redacted by the Bureau, “please do not discuss biden matter.” We asked for a response from the bureau and the FBI employees identified in the chat messages. An FBI spokesman declined to comment. We go in-depth on the chat messages for subscribers!
- Aug 23, 20264.2x their median
STARING TONIGHT: And Every Sunday, Until The 25th Anniversary, I Will Post Investigative Content About The Untold Stories of 9/11. I Begin With FBI records That Have Been Withheld From The Public And The 9/11 Families About Who Helped The Hijackers Inside The US. There Is So Much More To The Story.....
- Aug 12, 20263.7x their median
BREAKING: Declassified Records Reveal Alleged Tampering With Confidential Source Info to Blunt Ukraine Corruption Claims, Benefit Bidens Declassified "Delta Project" by DNI @TulsiGabbard's team found: - @FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force unofficially formed a group of analysts who gathered "any/all derogatory information" about Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma as well as the so-called "Ukraine Narrative" - Analysts "red flagged" negative reporting, had "administrative access" to files and deemed "Russian disinformation" - "Round River" Team operated leading up to and through the 2020 US Presidential Election - Some long standing confidential sources eventually "terminated" after reporting negative intel about Ukraine/Bidens - 'Round River' did not 'corroborate any of the (actual) allegations of the 'Ukraine Narrative'
- Aug 27, 20263.4x their median
DHS WARNING: CHINESE PARTS IN ELECTION MACHINES, REQUIRES PAPER BALLOT AUDITS - Letter @SecMullinDHS Summarizes Classified Records - "Voting machines with components manufactured by foreign adversaries introduce significant security risks" - "need for strong mitigation strategies, particularly considering the known weaknesses in the election infrastructure supply chain" - To receive full DHS grants, states must conduct "post-election manual counts of paper ballots" in addition to other election infrastructure measures INTEL ASSESSMENTS: 'China remains the most active and persistent cyber threat to U.S. Government, private-sector, and critical infrastructure networks.' - National Intelligence Council Memo October 2024 “We assess that some U.S. adversaries—at a minimum China, Iran, and Russia…have the technical capability to access some U.S. election-related networks and systems.” Admin official: No intel China has successfully manipulated an American vote count, @WhiteHouse Transparency Task Force
- Aug 10, 20262.6x their median
...the Hunter Biden reporting most newsrooms dismissed or ignored. From my October 2024 Investigation Herridge: What do you think the biggest misconception is about the Hunter Biden case? IRS Whistleblower Joseph Ziegler: that he committed this felony tax conduct while he was high on drugs, and was out of his mind...not true. He actually filed these false tax returns when he admitted in his book that he was newly sober." Extraordinary work @EMPOWR_us supporting the IRS whistleblowers Ziegler and Gary Shapley
- Aug 10, 20261.9x their median
BREAKING: Texas Children’s Hospital Nurse Vanessa Sivadge Speaks For The First Time Since Historic $10 Million Settlement After Blowing The Whistle on Alleged Medicaid Fraud Linked to “Gender-Affirming” Treatments on Minors @V_Sivadge was the principal government witness in the False Claims Act case that forced a landmark $10 million settlement. In this exclusive, first interview, Sivadge details the alleged multi-layered Medicaid fraud used to fund gender-affirming treatments on minors, details the FBI showing up to her home under the Biden DOJ, and reacts to the hospital’s agreement to open America’s first hospital-funded detransition clinic. Your subscriptions @C__Herridge make my independent journalism possible. Vanessa's attorney Marcella Burke calls it a “watershed” settlement that sets a national precedent. TX AG Ken Paxton: “This settlement sends an unmistakable message: if you put radical ideology over children's health, my office will go after you. We will continue to lead the way in stopping the far-left’s radical gender agenda.” Justice Department Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward: “The Department of Justice is committed to protecting America’s children. Today’s resolution furthers that commitment and puts providers of so-called 'gender affirming care' on notice that this Department will vigorously enforce federal law where children are put at risk." Texas Children’s Hospital: “Last week we finalized a settlement agreement with the Texas Attorney General and the U.S. Department of Justice bringing a close to this chapter to focus our resources on life-saving care and discoveries. We are grateful for and proud of our renowned physicians and nurses whose clinical excellence makes us the nation’s leading pediatric and women’s health system. Our focus remains on creating a healthier future for children and women across Texas and the world.” 02:05 Sivadge: “I was the government witness…In this this false claims act case against TX Children’s Hospital” 02:58 How alleged fraud with taxpayer dollars worked 03:30 Sivadge: “...a 15 year old girl had a testosterone deficiency and a boy had an estrogen deficiency…” 04:30 Vindicated: “I didn’t know if I would end up in jail ...our faith carried us through..” 05:48 Lawyer Marcella Burke: “Monumental settlement,” detransitioners clinic, doctors fired 07:22 Sivadge: “...I would be facing prison under a Kamala Harris presidency.” 07:44 Sivadge: "FBI came to my door and they told me that if I did not collaborate with them, that they could not protect me and that my safety and my career were at risk.” 10:25 Lawyer: Texas Children’s claimed they were not performing gender affirming services 11:24 Sivadge: “I think the biggest risk of all is that children, their reproductive sexual health is utterly destroyed.” 12:10 What was driving this? Parents, Kids, Doctors... 13:10 Alleged fraud with Medicaid Dollars, low income families “suicide or treatment, suicide or surgery” 14:48 In the settlement, does Texas Children’s Hospital admit fault? 15:50 Did any doctors lose their licenses? 16:14 Sivadge: I was fired after going to journalist @christopherrufo 17:12 Cost of coming forward 17:57 Sivadge: “The institution that once sanctioned the harm of these kids is now reversing course and offering them help.” 18:55 Sivadge: “I think this is the type of story only God can write…” 19:29 Sivadge: “I'm a nurse and I believe in biological truth…this is me trusting the science. 19:57 Burke: “It is setting a precedent within the Department of Justice as they move to settle these cases across the country.”
- Aug 18, 20261.8x their median
NEW: Declassified Records Allege Top Official Reluctant to Share Election Intel, Feared "Deep State" Label @WhiteHouse Transparency Task Force March 2020 email: Alleges deputy director of National Security Agency (NSA) opposed sharing election intelligence including 2016 and 2020 - Timing could 'invite accusations of politicization' - First Trump administration was “suspicious of the IC (intelligence community) and aggressive in removing anyone who stands in their way.” - Acting ODNI Richard Grenell @RichardGrenell “had been tasked to ‘clean house’ in the intelligence community.” - Releasing intelligence about the 2016 election in 2020 would lead the NSA to being "accused of releasing it for political purposes.” - Deputy Director (DDIR) wanted to protect the NSA’s reputation as neutral, credible while admitting that the CIA, FBI, and ODNI were “perceived… as hosting or being part of the ‘deep state.’” - "The meeting ended with a suggestion that we all chew on it. (REDACTED) said (REDACTED) would come back with options." CONTEXT: A credible whistleblower complaint was filed alleging that the CIA, FBI, and other IC agencies suppressed intelligence about China’s influence operations during the 2020 election targeting President Trump and his campaign. China’s goal was to “impede” President Trump’s re-election and “denigrate” him as a candidate. The DNI is working to declassify the records. Recently declassified records show China obtained more than 200 million voter files during the 2020 election cycle. No evidence votes changed, but China could use data for identity theft, false voter registration, and coupled with other hacked data, such as credit reporting, for blackmail. No immediate response from NSA nor former senior intelligence official, contacted through reported place of work. Will update if I hear back. Thank you for subscribing @C__Herridge It makes my independent journalism possible.
- Aug 20, 20261.7x their median
DOJ COMEY 'SEASHELL' FILING: TIMING AND TEXTS - EXCULPATORY OR INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE? PG. 7 "At 3:12 pm, Comey’s wife sent him a screenshot of what appeared to be a partial (cropped) definition of “U.S. English slang” indicating that “86” means “to get rid of or refuse service.” "Two minutes later, at 3:14 pm, Comey posted a picture of the seashells on his Instagram account with the caption “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.” PG. 9 'The relative texted Comey’s wife: “You guys have really gone off the deep end over the years with your TDS [Trump Derangement Syndrome]. 8647 is a call for violence no matter how you spin it. You should be ashamed of yourselves. . . I hope Jim goes to jail for his crimes.” Comey’s wife responded denying that the post had been a call to violence.' Comey deleted the post later that day. He has claimed he did so in response to the text from his relative.'
- Aug 19, 20261.7x their median
EXCLUSIVE 9/11: Why are government reports still hidden from the public about the hijackers' US support network, FBI analysis of their phone records and connections to Saudi government employees? If the STATE SECRETS privilege was invoked, 9/11 family members like Dennis McGinley @DennisMcGinley8 believe President Trump @realDonaldTrump "could be the hero and the champion that we have been waiting for, for the last 25 years." @WhiteHouse In this letter, the public declassification board says it is "actively engaged" and advocating for long over due transparency. The tireless work of @eaglesonbrett and 9/11 Justice has revealed critical evidence about the 9/11 plot, much of the evidence coming from British authorities and not the US government.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.45%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 122K times each, and 3.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 38% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
- What is Catherine Herridge's engagement rate on X?
- Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) has an engagement rate of 0.45%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,056,557 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.45%, Catherine Herridge sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @C__Herridge have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @C__Herridge post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.