Back to @CaolanReports's profile

Caolan engagement report

@CaolanReports - 161K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
5.39%
of 161K followers
Per impression
11.5%
76K views on a typical post
Reach
47.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.149%
113 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 8.7K interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 5.39%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 11.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 47.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Caolan's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 5.39%, Caolan sits above the 90th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.63% to 82.5%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 329 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 13, 20263.3x their median

    Let’s be clear about what’s happening here: Ukraine is being threatened with starlink removal and intel being cut off for literally fighting back and defending itself. For nearly 5 years the west has been trying to get Ukraine to hold back. Utterly pathetic.

    24K4.8K63387208K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20263.3x their median

    Trump removed sanctions on the country that murdered 30 innocent people riding on this bus last week. He has sided with this. https://t.co/ijyOnqg8wY

    22K6.1K474159177K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20263.2x their median

    Trumps team just described the people who bombed the Mariupol theatre as humanitarians The word children was written outside https://t.co/TT4u8X6G4y

    22K5.6K20595153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.5x their median

    Trumps special delegation bursting with excitement to meet the man who has been helping Iran bomb US bases all year. https://t.co/XdyiNy0Q04

    16K4.8K558187229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    Witkoff & Kushner just left Kyiv talking about Putin’s “aspirations.” Now the city is covered in fire and smoke after a huge missile attack. This is what Putin’s “aspirations” actually look like. https://t.co/kWbcz255Tq

    11K4.2K40594125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.8x their median

    There are no flights over Ukraine because of russia. Soon, there will be no flights over russia because of russia. If they don’t like that, then they can stop the war.

    14K2.0K37338122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.8x their median

    After a day sitting opposite Kushner and Witkoff, it’s clear they see Russia’s invasion as a business deal They keep amplifying what Putin wants, what Russia can gain and what Ukraine must give up. This is what happens when Trump sends real-estate developers to negotiate a war. https://t.co/wNtJFIUD0J

    12K3.4K561117256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.7x their median

    Moscow stops burning when they stop the war they started

    13K1.2K63042116K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20261.7x their median

    Steve Witkoff has financial interests in russia and he’s in Moscow because Americas foreign policy is now about making as much corrupt cash as possible for the Trump family. That’s why they’re calling Putin a humanitarian. His missiles are crashing into Kyiv right now by the way https://t.co/eQA7ap514l

    11K3.5K2177579K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.6x their median

    Kyiv is getting terrorised every hour and the world is already used to it like it’s the new normal. When Nazis bombed London for 57 days we didn’t call it London’s new normal we called it the Blitz. This should be no different. https://t.co/G9rJsTGNmM

    9.9K3.3K45347116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8.7K interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 5.39%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 11.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 47.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

What is Caolan's engagement rate on X?
Caolan (@CaolanReports) has an engagement rate of 5.39%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,309 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 5.39%, Caolan sits above the 90th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CaolanReports have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CaolanReports post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going