Back to @CellC's profile

@CellC engagement report

@CellC - 388K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 388K followers
Per impression
0.367%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.367% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.351% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 345 interactions, about 69x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nothingshouldstopyou, #switchtosee, #cellcresults.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #nothingshouldstopyou, #switchtosee, #cellcresults.

Compared with accounts its own size

@CellC's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, @CellC sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202669x their median

    Catch it LIVE ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‰ Sharks ๐Ÿ†š Bulls this Friday, 28 Aug at 19:15 SAST! Carling Currie Cup action doesn't get better than this! Which team scores the 1st try? PREDICT & WIN!! Comment below to WIN one of ten 2GB + a Cell C Hamper! @SharksRugby #NothingShouldStopYou https://t.co/4BxPiuwh2x

    1257614404.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202642x their median

    Sharks fans, how well do you know your team? ๐Ÿฆˆ When did the Sharks win their first Currie Cup title? A) 1995 B) 2005 C) 1990 D) 2010 Reply with your answer and stand a chance to WIN one of ten 2GB game day data. @SharksRugby #CurrieCup #SwitchToSee #CellCxSharksQuiz https://t.co/rE3rmRsiUY

    73439424.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202637x their median

    Rugby knowledge: activated. ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ‰ A) Sharksโ€™ home stadium? B) The All Blacksโ€™ traditional war dance? C) A Sharks all-time leading points scorer? Answer all 3 and you could WIN double tickets + a Cell C hamper! ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ”ฅ Comment & tag a friend. ๐Ÿ‘‡#NothingShouldStopYou https://t.co/4VCrqnyAI0

    68367185.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202621x their median

    CALLING ALL NITE OWLS ๐Ÿฆ‰ Win 3GB Nite Data! Follow @CellC, drop your Nite Mood emoji (๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŽฌ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ’ฌ๐ŸŽต) and tag a friend. 5 winners. 3GB each. Valid 7 days. T&Cs apply. Get Nite Data here: https://t.co/qVr4J8jJ6u https://t.co/UP6g84FL3j

    39184812.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.0x their median

    With Cell Cโ€™s Travel eSIM, getting ready for a trip is simple. Just visit https://t.co/kkFS2K7euL, choose your destination and the bundle that suits your trip, then pay securely online. #NothingShouldStopYou https://t.co/ku6ZDAN5oU

    86511.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.4x their median

    Keep the chat going. ๐Ÿ’ฌ Get a Cell C WhatsApp Bundle for messages, voice notes, photos, videos and documents. Buy via *147# or online: https://t.co/O6ROsB5BIi https://t.co/2w4FqI1HEH

    96111.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.2x their median

    Every woman has a chapter that is hers to own. ๐Ÿงก As we move forward, we create space for one another, champion each otherโ€™s growth and lift others as we rise. Hereโ€™s to #Unstoppable women. Happy Women's Day Mzansi! https://t.co/DSQMnz2Xrb

    82102.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.2x their median

    Out of data? Don't put life on hold. Emergency Recharge lets you recharge now and pay later. Get started online via ๐Ÿ“ฒ Cell C App: https://t.co/HiA5lYW9Fm https://t.co/4El3zbBhb2

    81201.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    Results delivered. Cell C FY2026 Performance: - More than halved debt - Revenue: R12.6bn - 8.884m Subscribers (excl. HLR base) - Data Traffic: +47% - Joint #1 Network Reliability - Leading MVNO enabler View the full results: https://t.co/HWRkchpY32 #CellCResults https://t.co/wWYJRofc3t

    64001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.0x their median

    Rugby knowledge? ON LOCK. ๐Ÿ”’๐Ÿ‰ You got the answers right, so we got the 2GB GameDay Data coming your way. ๐Ÿ“ถ๐Ÿ”ฅ Congrats to all our winners! ๐Ÿ‘ https://t.co/lU8BE3qXdc

    82001.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nothingshouldstopyou#switchtosee#cellcresults#unstoppable

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.367% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.351% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 345 interactions, about 69x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nothingshouldstopyou, #switchtosee, #cellcresults.

What is @CellC's engagement rate on X?
@CellC (@CellC) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 387,760 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, @CellC sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CellC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CellC post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going