Back to @Celo's profile

Celo engagement report

@Celo - 507K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 507K followers
Per impression
0.741%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
2.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
108
interactions (median)
Saved
0.062%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 108 interactions against 507K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.741% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 332 interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Celo's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, Celo sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 20263.1x their median

    The first (f)air drop, at last. No bots draining the pool. No speculative assets. Only real humans claiming real money, only on Celo. @Selfxyz & @GoogleCloud's @USAT Faucet is live: https://t.co/gSZfiPMjAa https://t.co/ZipMgdZp0l

    2663522954K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.2x their median

    🤝 @Lisk is entering its next chapter, recommending Celo as the new home for ecosystem builders as the blockchain winds down Celo Core Co. is here to support those global founders across Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa & beyond ↓ https://t.co/DeOLQHWa9B

    1892971321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.7x their median

    ⚠️ AGENTS AT WORK: Our next hackathon starts Friday, August 28th! 🚧 $5K in bounties across 5 tracks is yours to win, all dedicated to agents built on Celo with real utility & adoption Start building w/ access to the latest infrastructure before anyone else... https://t.co/AicmxohsY7

    14117131526K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.5x their median

    $CELO now has over 92 million holders @Opera continues to onboard new holders to the Celo ecosystem, adding 62.5 million in the past 90 days (source: @tokenterminal) https://t.co/djPukXZrwi

    131198616K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    For millions, buying airtime or paying a bill still means cash & a trip to the kiosk With @MiniPay, it's a few taps & a fast stablecoin payment right from your phone That's just one use case - 70+ Mini Apps are expanding everyday utility

    91137013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Verified humans: free @USAT is waiting for you Prove your humanity privately w/ @selfxyz, claim through the @GoogleCloud USA₮ Mainnet Faucet & earn extra by sending or holding Learn more about the first (f)air drop, only on Celo https://t.co/aR3mgaPHHO

    80199115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Money should move as easily as a message @Marek_ shares how Celo was designed for this https://t.co/UMq0KC6FxA

    85164313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    📺 @stabledash viewers saw it first; now verified humans everywhere can claim! @selfxyz and @googlecloud's USA₮ Faucet is live on Celo, distributing real @USAT to real humans Claim yours today: https://t.co/gSZfiPMjAa https://t.co/PDP8LYtsfd

    61812010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    🚧 AGENTS AT WORK: the next @CeloDevs hackathon starts tomorrow, August 28th! ⚠️ Celo Regional Ambassadors Artu, Beni, Edidiong & Ghoza host the kickoff call Friday at 1pm GMT Learn more about the tracks, best practices & how to best compete for the $5K in bounties https://t.co/sani5iMIX2

    5311267.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    🔐 @inconetwork, a full-stack blockchain privacy layer, just launched on the Celo Sepolia testnet! Inco gives users a private asset layer on a Celo-supported wallet, allowing balances to stay private https://t.co/ffT9gbPxMJ

    528537.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 108 interactions against 507K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.741% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 332 interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.

What is Celo's engagement rate on X?
Celo (@Celo) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 507,063 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, Celo sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Celo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Celo post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going