Back to @ChainGPT_Pad's profile

ChainGPT Pad engagement report

@ChainGPT_Pad - 486K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 486K followers
Per impression
1.32%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
3.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
236
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 236 interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 897 interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ChainGPT Pad's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, ChainGPT Pad sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20263.8x their median

    The @dac_chain Buzzdrop is live on ChainGPT Pad. $DACT has allocated $100,000 in rewards for Buzzers. Complete quests, share your Buzz Links, drive real outcomes, climb the leaderboard. Join here šŸ‘‰ https://t.co/gUQmWzgXKZ https://t.co/clkyKTA7HW

    5931001604493K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    1,250+ Buzzers are in the @dac_chain Buzzdrop on ChainGPT Pad. $100,000 in $DACT is live until September 14, 12 PM UTC. DAC is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 built for quantum security, with DWF Labs and Da Vinci on market making. Rank decides your slice, so grab your Buzz Links early. Start Buzzing šŸ‘‰ https://t.co/zxIp3xxqZg

    3104992724K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.5x their median

    Join our AMA with Maxime from @0xlabstech to learn about the path from MVP to TGE, and what it actually takes to launch in 2026. Plus, discover what ChainGPT Pad has to offer to founders launching in 2026. šŸ“… Friday, August 28 šŸ•§ 12:30pm UTC šŸ“Œ https://t.co/rcsBw2NYF1 https://t.co/TBsdLrrLpj

    2156182018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    Hyperliquid's RWA perps are booming - open positions just hit a record high. But the fee-sharing deal hands half of every trade's fees to the outside builders who deployed those markets, and that half never reaches the pool that buys back $HYPE. So even with record volume, the money funding buybacks has fallen four quarters straight. Read the split before you read the growth.

    16021136118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Crypto cards moved $1B in spending, and 70% of that was paid with USDC and USDT. So a billion dollars of stablecoins went to groceries and flights. Card rails run one way, and that money leaves the order books for good. Some of the stablecoin supply counted as buying power is spending money now. Worth remembering the next time someone points at total supply and calls it demand waiting to happen.

    2152379018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    3%. BlackRock's new Canadian fund holds global stocks with 3% in Bitcoin. Someone picked that number before the fund opened and wrote it down. Do that for your next launch buy. Pick the dollar amount tonight, while the chart is boring and the group chat is quiet, so the number is already decided when the sale goes live. The buyers who stick around size the position before there's anything to feel about.

    10461129019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    500 million testnet transactions can be one laptop running a for-loop overnight. Testnet gas is free, so the number mostly measures how badly someone wanted the number. Mainnet fees, real paying users, and deposits that stick around all cost money to fake, so those are the ones worth reading. Testnet volume is the new whitepaper: impressive by the pound and binding on nothing.

    14020132019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    A fake DefiLlama app sat on Apple's App Store, draining wallets. DefiLlama's founder said the team had to document the theft themselves before Apple pulled the app, which it did within days of that report. They delayed their own mobile launch over it. Install from the link the project posts itself.

    1632998017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    You paid on BNB Chain. Your tokens may land somewhere your wallet has never been. Sales run on BNB Chain because that's where the buyers are. But the claim opens on the project's home chain, where the token actually lives. The sale page names that chain. Add it to your wallet before claim day. A five-minute setup feels a lot longer with tokens waiting.

    14820119018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Agents don't read Discord invites. They read docs. An AI agent buying into a token sale never sees your thread, your meme, or your countdown timer. It reads the price, the rules it's allowed to follow, and it either buys or it doesn't. So the pitch stops being copy and starts being the terms themselves - price, unlock schedule, what a wallet is permitted to do. Write launches for a buyer who skips the marketing.

    15125109017K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 236 interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 897 interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

What is ChainGPT Pad's engagement rate on X?
ChainGPT Pad (@ChainGPT_Pad) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 485,619 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, ChainGPT Pad sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChainGPT_Pad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChainGPT_Pad post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going