Back to @Chinmayi's profile

Chinmayi Sripaada engagement report

@Chinmayi - 975K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.154%
of 975K followers
Per impression
2.53%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
6.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.194%
116 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.63/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 975K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 2.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 100K interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #jaanu, #pranam.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #breaking, #jaanu, #pranam.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chinmayi Sripaada's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.154%, Chinmayi Sripaada sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202666x their median

    Sinead O’Connor revealed a network of pedophiles and their protectors in 1992. She was a victim herself and to protest ripped up a photo of John Paul II that ended her career. We now have a circulating photo of John Paul II blessing Epstein. She was right all the time. https://t.co/5ZiOfoWcJa

    79K20K5013051.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202653x their median

    ‼️ BREAKING: Journalists hid an Airtag in a rare book shipment and confirmed Amazon to be one of the buyers behind the bulk orders destroying rare-books to feed their AI. They tracked it to Amazon's LAS8 warehouse in Las Vegas, home to VGT3 (see logo below), a scanning operation feeding Amazon's AI training data, where workers say they cut the bindings off books to scan them faster. Amazon won't say why the books are destroyed.

    61K17K8899404.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202646x their median

    It has been 200 days since the Epstein files were released with zero prosecutions. As someone works in human rights, I’ve never seen anything like the Epstein files in my 15-year career. There are 3 million files of documented evidence about powerful men and women who Raped Cannibalized Trafficked Filmed Terrorized Tortured Hunted Murdered 13, 14, 15 year children! Remember: this is a minority of the files. This's just what they were willing to release. Not a single arrest or investigation. ZERO have been arrested for raping children. We called on the U.S. Department of Justice to hand over the full Epstein files to the UN Special Rapporteurs and UN independent committees for investigations, as this is an international case of crimes against humanity. But the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN's top human rights official didn't even care to open an investigation or listen to our call for the DOJ, nor utter a single word regarding the largest human trafficking network in modern history. Epstein pedophiles are investigating Epstein files. We wonder why nobody arrested. Jeffery Epstein has every major politicians and billionaires on video doing something terrible to a child or to multiple people. And the media isn't silent about child sex trafficking because of the children. It’s silent because of who the customers are! The Epstein files is never really about just a "list." It is about children raped by powerful men, and a system that let them get away with it. The bottom line here is the world system has become so corrupt that the time has come I think to clean the crap out of the stables and start over. The Epstein files is about protecting children. There's no greater cause. If people can't unite over children being raped and abused there's no hope for humanity. I don't understand how we're not having a global revolution right now.

    46K21K734528685K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202613x their median

    BREAKING🚨: Anti feminism women discover that misogynistic men hate them no matter how much they pander, uphold patriarchy,or cheer for women to lose rights. Pro natalist men are degrading & dismissive about post partum because they hate women & view women as objects not people. https://t.co/OAMK67LzDb

    16K2.2K381218292K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.7x their median

    Biggest scam of last decade Swachh Bharat Mission Govt collected a dedicated cess in the name of cleanliness. A decade later, look at our roads. Garbage everywhere, broken footpaths, overflowing drains and dust all over the place. https://t.co/TOLpUD9oHy

    8.7K3.3K826222462K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20267.8x their median

    A judge dismissed a lawsuit from a civilian engineer after it was determined that her report of being raped in her bed aboard a Navy transport ship was within her duties and must be treated as a worker's comp claim. (from @Rose_Lori) https://t.co/wYiyEQj1ga

    6.9K3.2K5201.0K2.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.9x their median

    🚨 Haryana to build India’s tallest tower at 700 m in Gurugram. https://t.co/pbl23brlga

    6.5K43628597414K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.7x their median

    Just when you think we've run out of ways to be cruel to the animals we eat, someone invents this. 😡 Can you imagine the claustrophobia, confusion, & terror this poor #fish will endure? 😢 https://t.co/mSn5V6oYje

    4.4K1.6K8132142.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.5x their median

    VERY IMPORTANT: Delhi Police has admitted in the SC that facial recognition technology was deployed during the Jantar Mantar protests. Now for facial recognition to make a “match”, there needs to be an underlying database of photos+details of citizens. So where did Delhi Police get that database from? In response to an RTI of mine in 2020, the Election Commission admitted that it had shared the entire voter list WITH PHOTOS with Delhi Police during the Delhi riots investigation. Interestingly, ECI’s own rules PROHIBIT sharing of photo electoral roll with ANY agency. And yet, the ECI broke its own rules in 2020 & handed over the data to Delhi Police. Therefore: 👉 Did ECI supply voter lists with photos to Delhi Police for their facial recognition database during Jantar Mantar protests? 👉 What other agencies (Aadhaar, IT Dept, Transport Dept etc) have shared their database with Delhi Police to be used for facial recognition? 👉 If no agency has provided any data, how is Delhi Police managing to conduct facial recognition on EVERYONE (not just those with a criminal record) during protests? There’s a reason that the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act has NOT yet been fully notified despite being passed by Parliament in Aug 2023 (THREE YEARS AGO). It’s 2 simple questions really: 👉 Will the Delhi Police disclose what database it is using for facial recognition? 👉 Will ECI & other bodies confirm whether they’re still providing photo databases to Delhi Police?

    4.8K1.8K10251115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.3x their median

    I said more women have died in childbirth than men have died in wars and the smooth brain males are crashing out in the comments. Simple google could avoid their argument.

    5.9K39860862K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking#jaanu#pranam#premkumar#collector

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 975K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 2.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 100K interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #jaanu, #pranam.

What is Chinmayi Sripaada's engagement rate on X?
Chinmayi Sripaada (@Chinmayi) has an engagement rate of 0.154%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 974,917 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.154%, Chinmayi Sripaada sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chinmayi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chinmayi post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going