Back to @ChrisMurphyCT's profile

Chris Murphy 🟧 engagement report

@ChrisMurphyCT - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.065%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
1.98%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
3.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
720
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 720 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #ohsen.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chris Murphy 🟧's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.065%, Chris Murphy 🟧 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 202640x their median

    I went to the Senate floor today to ask a simple question. Can any of my Republican colleagues defend the President's disgusting new scheme to sell early access to White House announcements about the war for $100,000 a month? Of course they can't. https://t.co/BsgP8nKl42

    22K6.1K868125386K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202621x their median

    I will support a bad deal to end this war. Because we need to cut Trump’s hemorrhaging losses now. But the supposed deal on the table pays Iran $100 billion to open the Strait. And no concessions on their nuclear program. What an unmitigated disaster. https://t.co/YVawYTRIM7

    11K2.9K1.4K144319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202621x their median

    Imagine a child boarding the school bus for the first day of 2nd grade. He kisses his dad goodbye, and when he gets off the bus that afternoon, dad is gone. No one is there to pick him up. The 7 year old is abandoned, alone, scared. That's what happened in Danbury this week. https://t.co/zPm0ELxXo6

    7.3K2.9K4.4K296263K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202620x their median

    The conditions in ICE detention centers are outrageous. Worms. Standing sewage water. Measles outbreaks. 52 people have died so far. No American - no matter what your view is on immigration - should stand for this inhumanity. https://t.co/we1IcYGFt9

    7.8K3.4K3.3K214137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    ICE is not in Danbury and other Connecticut cities to protect people. They are here to besiege our communities. To create chaos and act lawlessly. If they aren’t going to obey the law, they need to leave. https://t.co/OBagNyPkLL

    4.4K1.2K2.5K138219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20269.0x their median

    This is just not the government people want. A government so sadistic and cruel that it delights in using your hard earned tax dollars to buy gloves that shock people upon contact. https://t.co/9oraj5Bzvn

    4.0K1.6K8177255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.2x their median

    Trump says ICE is targeting criminals. They aren't. It's a lie. In Danbury, they are just targeting parents. Sitting at school bus stops. Just to terrorize little kids. https://t.co/MsTH8xsHvT

    2.8K9861.3K7658K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.0x their median

    You need to listen to this story. A 15 year old Connecticut high school student won the Department of Education's civics contest. But he was denied a place on the podium. And the question is why and whether it was because his parents are immigrants. https://t.co/Kd3eBlGxPZ

    2.5K8721852647K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.8x their median

    This morning the Judiciary Committee is expected to approve Trump’s personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, for Attorney General. Republicans will claim they got a commitment to end Trump’s political payout slush fund. THEY DID NOT. Let me tell you why. https://t.co/3UY1hx5nlD

    2.2K9752852935K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.7x their median

    Just arrived in Danbury to demand accountability for the dozens of immigrants - many of them here legally - that have been disappeared in recent days. Some ripped from their kids at school bus stops. Keep protesting, but peacefully. ICE is looking to provoke a crisis. https://t.co/XB48T3kHDu

    2.3K6533913139K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ohsen

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 720 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is Chris Murphy 🟧's engagement rate on X?
Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) has an engagement rate of 0.065%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,115,792 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.065%, Chris Murphy 🟧 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChrisMurphyCT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChrisMurphyCT post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going