Chris Smoove engagement report
@ChrisSmoove - 440K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 564x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Chris Smoove's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Chris Smoove sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 94% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 94% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 133 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 24, 2026564x their median
Shams brings up the possibility of LeBron James living in New York while he plays for the 76ers. It's a 45-minute trip from New York City to Philadelphia on a chopper.
- Sep 1, 20261714x their median
Tim Cook just unlocked his final form 🥶 https://t.co/ke2pG9WUrQ
- Jul 12, 2026505x their median
A tourist was tossed in the air by a bull bison in Yellowstone National Park. Pretty wild how quickly things escalated and how much ground the bull bison covers after it finished wallowing in the recreational area. https://t.co/QE7tPFK4iZ
- Jul 10, 2026399x their median
Why tf do I need to make 3.5x the rent?! You don’t even make that
- Aug 11, 20261220x their median
This guy is cooked. Good luck with that, buddy. 👍🏽 https://t.co/xrWKafu7L1
- Oct 20, 2026663x their median
I tried to tip an especially good waiter in Tokyo and found out it was impossible. Knowing he wouldn't take a tip on the bill, I left cash. He took it off my credit card bill after the fact.
- Jul 31, 2026327x their median
I just got robbed. $1.6 million dollars in Bitcoin was drained from my account on July 29th in the @COLDCARDwallet hack. How's your day going?
- Sep 13, 2026252x their median
he’s moving 😳 https://t.co/W5bCNQICcm
- Oct 23, 2026109x their median
Okay, genuine advice for the non-Chads. This is not bait. This is real advice. If you want a woman, if you want a relationship, and if you want a woman who is consistent and sticks around, you actually have to offer what Chad doesn’t. You have to offer commitment. You have to offer commitment BEFORE sex. You have to offer courtship. You have to offer dates. You have to offer gifts. You have to offer all of the things that would make her see how you’re different and make a relationship with you more enticing than a casual thing with Chad. You may not like this, and I think a lot of the time there’s a lot of resentment, so the non-Chads don’t want to do it. “Wah, wah. Why should I have to put in all the effort if Chad doesn’t?” Because you’re not Chad. Because he gets to do something you don’t. End of story. You don’t like it? Too bad. Grow up. This is life. This is what you have to do if you want to get a partner. There’s literally no way around it.
- Jul 11, 202622x their median
More about a group being led by San Francisco 49ers limited partner Vinod Khosla agreeing to purchase the Seattle Seahawks for $9.6 billion, a record sale price for an NFL franchise, via @SethWickersham and me. https://t.co/cJEm46FQlN
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 564x its own typical post.
- What is Chris Smoove's engagement rate on X?
- Chris Smoove (@ChrisSmoove) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 439,750 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Chris Smoove sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ChrisSmoove have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ChrisSmoove post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.