Back to @ChuckRobbins's profile

Chuck Robbins engagement report

@ChuckRobbins - 4.4M followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 4.4M followers
Per impression
0.304%
137K views on a typical post
Reach
3.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
414
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 414 interactions against 4.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 137K times each, and 0.304% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ciscogsx, #coherentpluggables, #ciscocrisisresponse.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #ciscogsx, #coherentpluggables, #ciscocrisisresponse.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chuck Robbins's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Chuck Robbins sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202621x their median

    Hard to find the words for this one. Seeing my bust take its place among so many people I grew up admiring is incredibly humbling. It’s a moment I’ll carry with me forever. https://t.co/shAEDp1seD

    8.1K43116222347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202610x their median

    i shared the message below with the openai team this morning. these decisions are never easy, but the talent and mission orientation of the openai team make me more optimistic than ever. 🤍 ### Team, it is bittersweet to share that I’ll be moving on from OpenAI to start something new. I feel incredibly fortunate to have spent most of the last decade pursuing our mission and building this company. Sitting here today, mission success feels within sight. It has been the honor of my life to help bring us to this point, and to do it alongside all of you. I joined OpenAI in 2018, eight years ago this month, because I wanted to work on something hard. @sama introduced me to @gdb and @ilyasut, who showed me a pitch deck suggesting that because models improve predictably with scale, AGI was not only possible but likely. If you had told me then that we’d be where we are today, I wouldn't have believed you. In the years that followed, I had the privilege of building the first versions of most of our operations and business teams – from Finance to Legal, People, CorpSec, GTM/Gov, Partnerships, and more. Among the most rewarding parts of this journey for me has been watching each of these teams mature under brilliant leaders. I am excited for the next decade in the hands of this incredibly capable team. At the same time, we grew from a small research lab to one of the most consequential companies of our time. I was reminded of that fact constantly – from serving our first user to our billionth, to the growing scale and ambition of our partnerships and the occasional curveball (the Blip, etc.). Through it all, I’m proud of how we’ve maintained our focus on people. It always amazes me how quickly the world has adopted our tools and rallied behind our mission. I hope we will continue to earn their trust. Over the last few months, I’ve been focused on the next horizon and what would stand in the way of mission success. I believe there are a few important new things the world will need to get right as we enter this next period. I’ll have more to share soon, but I believe in OpenAI more than ever and am excited to help you all advance the mission from a different vantage point. I am deeply grateful to have had the opportunity to work with all of you, and to so many of you for the support through the years. The old OpenAI meme that “the real AGI is the friends you made along the way” really rings true for me. I will be around for the next few weeks. I am not going far and hope to continue to support you all however I can. I’ll always be a phone call away if you need me. Brad

    3.6K1383001241.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202612x their median

    we temporarily slowed scaling of our frontier training, including our largest planned frontier RL, to strengthen security and monitoring. we believe confidence in safety will increasingly set the pace of AI development:

    2.5K9331955313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.8x their median

    Last day at 1 Market with some of the best people in the business Almost 10 years to the date at CNBC in SF. More on the next chapter coming very soon :) https://t.co/N6KUdwTrxR

    1.8K341377276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.0x their median

    Sleepmaxxing https://t.co/6LoQAEuNRZ

    68047898319K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20263.3x their median

    If your goal is to get smarter about AI, follow @jpatel41. Hoping this means he’ll be posting here more often

    75530173509K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.7x their median

    The central kitchen that started it all. My first brick and mortar kitchen, the previous one was made of iron sheets (mabati). 180+ kitchens today. 240 coming 🚀 @Food4Education https://t.co/8m3zCqEt5T

    59183165194K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    What a week, what a team, and what a #CiscoGSX! It was a privilege to join @Tuszik and our global sales team for our annual kickoff in Las Vegas. It's clear we have everything we need to lead in the AI era: our innovation, full-stack portfolio, partners, and, of course, world-class sales team.   FY26 was a historic year for Cisco, and I’m looking forward to what’s ahead in FY27. We’re confident, but not comfortable!

    38778154122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Four weeks. From concept to protected generative AI. See how the United States Golf Association (@USGA) brought Rules AI to golfers—and how Cisco AI Defense helps secure the AI behind it.

    43631924.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Today we announced that Cisco is expanding our Secure AI Factory with NVIDIA to include Supermicro compute. We’re delivering the full-stack infrastructure organizations need to run massive AI workloads, simply and securely, and offering customers more choice so they can plan their investments with confidence. Learn more here: https://t.co/COZLs5F07S

    2617712199K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ciscogsx#coherentpluggables#ciscocrisisresponse#netacad#techforgood

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 414 interactions against 4.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 137K times each, and 0.304% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ciscogsx, #coherentpluggables, #ciscocrisisresponse.

What is Chuck Robbins's engagement rate on X?
Chuck Robbins (@ChuckRobbins) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,421,538 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Chuck Robbins sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChuckRobbins have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChuckRobbins post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going