Cisco Partners engagement report
@CiscoPartners - 92K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 602 times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.654% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ciscopartners, #ciscodistributors, #ciscops26.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #ciscopartners, #ciscodistributors, #ciscops26.
Compared with accounts its own size
Cisco Partners's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.013%, Cisco Partners sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 20261.9x their median
Most people ask AI for an answer. Very few give it a job. We're sharing five rules from Stephen Tessitore for using AI as a thought partner, plus the brief behind them: Context, Role, Interview, Task 👇 #CiscoPartners https://t.co/cgdHseC6bN
- Aug 18, 20261.9x their median
Cisco's cloud platform unites ecosystem partners Genea, WaitTime & GoZone to deliver seamless fan insights and access, while MSP Emerge ensures robust, scalable network operations at Cincinnati Open. Ready the full story: https://t.co/tjgahcLDFs #CiscoPartnerWins https://t.co/AEAhsepHSq
- Jul 24, 20261.8x their median
In the blog "Antares and the Partner Opportunity: Local, Efficient, Trusted AI for Security," Alex Pujols see how Cisco's open-weight small language models help organizations identify known vulnerabilities and keep sensitive code local. https://t.co/hcgbjdkzp7 #AI #CiscoPartners https://t.co/15h7dpD0ef
- Aug 25, 2026
Kick off the new fiscal year with confidence and clarity. Hear directly from Cisco's sales, business unit, and channel leaders as they share key priorities for FY27. Session AMER/EMEA https://t.co/64GawPSTt5 Session APJC https://t.co/88spO4zeE4 https://t.co/9pV815CYWJ
- Aug 21, 2026
Tired of enterprise architecture guides that assume a massive IT staff? Cisco’s new CIO Blueprints are built for lean, midsize teams. Get vendor-neutral, practical strategies for AI, security, and hybrid work: https://t.co/2yS1aSJwCI https://t.co/zllAR0A0yP
- Aug 21, 2026
Cyber defense rules shifted overnight. Is infrastructure ready for the AI-era, or waiting to be exploited? AI-Era Cyber Defense Campaign Kit offers a blueprint to help you guide customers through this shift: https://t.co/OC6T0AUaHC https://t.co/B5QTk4wqO5
- Aug 7, 2026
95% of AI projects fail with no outcome. 📉 While interest is high, customer readiness remains low. How can partners bridge this gap and prepare for the next wave of AI innovation? Alex Pujols sat down with NTT’s Gary Middleton to discuss it. https://t.co/cv2T7a4HY6
- Aug 19, 2026
The future of work is AI-native. Cisco is refreshing the Devices and Webex Calling Deployment series to help you lead in this hybrid era. Master the latest in AI-powered audio, meeting interoperability, and advanced troubleshooting. 👉 https://t.co/tZxa9B84Er https://t.co/YvkjqZS8bc
- Aug 6, 2026
Drive Q1 pipeline growth with the latest Black Belt Quarterly Development Focus training. Access the same strategic content as internal Cisco teams, covering AI-Ready Data Centers, Futureproofed Workplaces, and Digital Resilience. Start now: <https://t.co/GWWmCLkwlL https://t.co/S2zI85zc8J
- Aug 7, 2026
Are you ready for a new threat landscape? The Partner Maturity Model Assessment for VulnOps is a vital tool that you can use to evaluate your current practice level and align your capabilities with the complexity of the customers you serve. Learn more: https://t.co/DcPRSg3X8J https://t.co/IEjaPWi28l
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 602 times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.654% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ciscopartners, #ciscodistributors, #ciscops26.
- What is Cisco Partners's engagement rate on X?
- Cisco Partners (@CiscoPartners) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,107 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.013%, Cisco Partners sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CiscoPartners have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CiscoPartners post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.