Back to @CiscoPartners's profile

Cisco Partners engagement report

@CiscoPartners - 92K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.013%
of 92K followers
Per impression
1.99%
602 views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 602 times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.654% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ciscopartners, #ciscodistributors, #ciscops26.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #ciscopartners, #ciscodistributors, #ciscops26.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cisco Partners's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Cisco Partners sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    Most people ask AI for an answer. Very few give it a job. We're sharing five rules from Stephen Tessitore for using AI as a thought partner, plus the brief behind them: Context, Role, Interview, Task 👇 #CiscoPartners https://t.co/cgdHseC6bN

    15701480 viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.9x their median

    Cisco's cloud platform unites ecosystem partners Genea, WaitTime & GoZone to deliver seamless fan insights and access, while MSP Emerge ensures robust, scalable network operations at Cincinnati Open. Ready the full story: https://t.co/tjgahcLDFs #CiscoPartnerWins https://t.co/AEAhsepHSq

    14621718 viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20261.8x their median

    In the blog "Antares and the Partner Opportunity: Local, Efficient, Trusted AI for Security," Alex Pujols see how Cisco's open-weight small language models help organizations identify known vulnerabilities and keep sensitive code local. https://t.co/hcgbjdkzp7 #AI #CiscoPartners https://t.co/15h7dpD0ef

    129001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Kick off the new fiscal year with confidence and clarity. Hear directly from Cisco's sales, business unit, and channel leaders as they share key priorities for FY27. Session AMER/EMEA https://t.co/64GawPSTt5 Session APJC https://t.co/88spO4zeE4 https://t.co/9pV815CYWJ

    11500809 viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Tired of enterprise architecture guides that assume a massive IT staff? Cisco’s new CIO Blueprints are built for lean, midsize teams. Get vendor-neutral, practical strategies for AI, security, and hybrid work: https://t.co/2yS1aSJwCI https://t.co/zllAR0A0yP

    12310625 viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Cyber defense rules shifted overnight. Is infrastructure ready for the AI-era, or waiting to be exploited? AI-Era Cyber Defense Campaign Kit offers a blueprint to help you guide customers through this shift: https://t.co/OC6T0AUaHC https://t.co/B5QTk4wqO5

    10600471 viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    95% of AI projects fail with no outcome. 📉 While interest is high, customer readiness remains low. How can partners bridge this gap and prepare for the next wave of AI innovation? Alex Pujols sat down with NTT’s Gary Middleton to discuss it. https://t.co/cv2T7a4HY6

    104111.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    The future of work is AI-native. Cisco is refreshing the Devices and Webex Calling Deployment series to help you lead in this hybrid era. Master the latest in AI-powered audio, meeting interoperability, and advanced troubleshooting. 👉 https://t.co/tZxa9B84Er https://t.co/YvkjqZS8bc

    9510616 viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    Drive Q1 pipeline growth with the latest Black Belt Quarterly Development Focus training. Access the same strategic content as internal Cisco teams, covering AI-Ready Data Centers, Futureproofed Workplaces, and Digital Resilience. Start now: <https://t.co/GWWmCLkwlL https://t.co/S2zI85zc8J

    10401578 viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Are you ready for a new threat landscape? The Partner Maturity Model Assessment for VulnOps is a vital tool that you can use to evaluate your current practice level and align your capabilities with the complexity of the customers you serve. Learn more: https://t.co/DcPRSg3X8J https://t.co/IEjaPWi28l

    8510624 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ciscopartners#ciscodistributors#ciscops26#innovationchallenge#cisco360partnerprogram

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 602 times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.654% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ciscopartners, #ciscodistributors, #ciscops26.

What is Cisco Partners's engagement rate on X?
Cisco Partners (@CiscoPartners) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,107 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Cisco Partners sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CiscoPartners have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CiscoPartners post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going