Complex Bets engagement report
@ComplexBets - 558K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 598 interactions, about 75x its own typical post.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Complex Bets's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Complex Bets sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jun 14, 202675x their median
Sometimes in life, captions are irrelevant 💙🧡🏆 https://t.co/QfVONjQycb
- Aug 25, 20264.6x their median
Fantasy Football managers, beware 👻 (📸: Getty) https://t.co/d5FX0Oqdcs
- Aug 25, 20263.9x their median
Carlos Alcaraz & Serena Williams are on to the US Open's mixed-doubles quarterfinals 🎾 Can this well-decorated duo go the distance in Queens?? (📸: Getty) https://t.co/G248MeVJGm
- Aug 26, 20263.0x their median
Yooooo the Fins are breaking the bank in 2026 ... just not on active players 🤯 (📸: Getty) https://t.co/TWBnqLKv6f
- Aug 25, 20263.0x their median
Klay in South Beach could be a match made in Heaven 🏝️ @FanaticsBook odds subject to change. (📸: Getty) https://t.co/gPT5QyFJBE
- Aug 25, 20262.4x their median
In 19 games with the Browns, Watson has never thrown for 300+ yards in any single contest 🤯 @FanaticsBook odds subject to change. (📸: Getty) https://t.co/ANsAkZWRne
- Aug 26, 20262.1x their median
After just 10 games and a slew injuries, it is becoming increasingly likely that McCarthy's time with the Vikings is coming to an end. ... J.J. was the 10th overall pick just two years ago 😬 (📸: Getty) https://t.co/MTwCr8SiIe
- Aug 25, 20261.9x their median
8️⃣ NFL teams debuted a new look today ... who stands out above the rest? https://t.co/hiCytgoCEr
- Aug 25, 20261.5x their median
Puka Nacua has been involved in several incidents over the past year that have raised eyebrows around the league. Should we expect him to play Week 1 in Australia? Read here ➡️ https://t.co/x5O5CDsq1C https://t.co/EMIUX4ZNE1
- Aug 26, 2026
According to us, anyway ... Things considered? Culture, aesthetics, sightlines, F&B, weather, accessibility and surrounding neighborhood. (📸: Getty) https://t.co/cfLGKsREid
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 598 interactions, about 75x its own typical post.
- What is Complex Bets's engagement rate on X?
- Complex Bets (@ComplexBets) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 558,126 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Complex Bets sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ComplexBets have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ComplexBets post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.