Back to @ConnorEatsPants's profile

connor engagement report

@ConnorEatsPants - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
3.61%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
1.68%
2.2M views on a typical post
Reach
214.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
37K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
816 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 37K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 3.61%. Posts are seen about 2.2M times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 214.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 278K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.61%, connor sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.10% to 159.8%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jan 25, 20267.5x their median

    bitch @JDVance

    264K14K4171454.7M viewsView on X
  • Jan 14, 20264.6x their median

    Extinction level indicator https://t.co/uxiUQtAmCy

    163K7.8K3322303.9M viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20264.0x their median

    Dear lord https://t.co/EZe8SBGTtn

    145K2.3K154214.4M viewsView on X
  • Jan 2, 20262.6x their median

    someone needs to do it

    91K5.5K3512062.0M viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 20262.5x their median

    In the current context, we are seeing an actual “short circuit” of #HumanRights. The right to freedom of expression, freedom of conscience, religious freedom, and even the right to life are being restricted in the name of other so-called new rights, with the result that the very framework of human rights is losing its vitality and creating space for force and oppression. This occurs when each right becomes self-referential, and especially when it becomes disconnected from reality, nature, and truth.

    78K11K1.5K8084.0M viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 20262.2x their median

    anyone else starting to question President Trump’s leadership

    77K2.1K1.3K1431.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    birthdays just don’t feel the same without the free flow of maritime trade through the Strait of Hormuz

    68K3.5K6216733K viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 20261.9x their median

    our World Cup team better be woke as fuck. pronouns we’ve never heard of. every hormone. gender on a 3d axis.

    68K2.5K1421832.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 12, 20261.7x their median

    Thanks for 1 Million followers :D shoutout to the fertile meme god @elonmusk for legalizing comedy ❤️ i am white by the way if Comedy is ever repealed, and the muzzle is put on me… remember to follow on other platforms 🐒

    62K1.3K12126972K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20251.7x their median

    💥 Fortnite Friday is BACK 💥 🚨 Governor of California, @GavinNewsom hops on the Battle Bus to talk all things gaming, politics, and more 🚨 🇺🇸 2:30 PM PST / 5:30 EST 🇺🇸 https://t.co/z85ozG7oW0

    57K3.1K8832.3K6.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 37K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 3.61%. Posts are seen about 2.2M times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 214.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 278K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is connor's engagement rate on X?
connor (@ConnorEatsPants) has an engagement rate of 3.61%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,031,684 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.61%, connor sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ConnorEatsPants have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ConnorEatsPants post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going