Back to @DFWscanner's profile

DFW Scanner engagement report

@DFWscanner - 468K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 468K followers
Per impression
0.315%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
3.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
58
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 468K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.315% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 709 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #rossfire.

Compared with accounts its own size

DFW Scanner's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, DFW Scanner sits above the 10th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.013%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.445%
p902.07%
p99144.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,299 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 90,063 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.445%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile144.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%58K
02:00 UTC-4%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%82K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%98K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%111K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%96K
19:00 UTC-2%91K
20:00 UTC-1%85K
21:00 UTC-1%75K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%58K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%253K
Monday+1%324K
Tuesday-2%348K
Wednesday-4%309K
Thursday-2%264K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%247K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    💨 You might notice a smoky haze in the air across portions of North Texas as smoke from the #RossFire drifts east into DFW. Multiple fire departments have already responded to smoke investigation calls in the impacted areas. As of this morning, the fire is 82,000 acres in size with 12% containment. Please keep all of the firefighters across the state and all of the residents in the impacted areas in your prayers.

    59491111347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.8x their median

    Another look at the train derailment in Mansfield along Holland Road. Expect a lot of activity in this area while crews clean up the scene. Thanks to Kevin Ho for the drone shot. https://t.co/JBGWdaCsH1

    294307328K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.3x their median

    Here’s a look at the train derailment along Holland Road in Mansfield. It’s a mess. Avoid this area while Mansfield firefighters work the scene. https://t.co/pduCYGp86K

    266318121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.2x their median

    The wildfire burning in central Palo Pinto County, which sparked around lunchtime today, has grown to an estimated size of 7,000 acres, according to the Texas A&M Forest Service. The fire is 5% contained. The smoke cloud has been visible on Doppler radar for most of the afternoon. #RossFire

    204315222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.0x their median

    Notice the thick black smoke in Grand Prairie today? Here’s the aftermath. ⬇️ Grand Prairie firefighters responded to a commercial property in the 1200 block of Avenue J East and found several vehicles on fire after a possible transformer explosion. A few dozen vehicles were engulfed in the flames, which put out a thick column of black smoke. Some residents in the area also reported a power outage as a result of the transformer issue. Nice work Grand Prairie Fire Department containing this one. 👉🏼 Thanks to Kevin Ho for the drone shot.

    1982010327K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.2x their median

    Fort Worth police say a student, or group of students, set off a firework in one of the bathrooms at Arlington Heights High School, prompting 9-1-1 calls of a school shooting. https://t.co/bcMPzhzVhV

    155226222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.9x their median

    (4:19pm 8/21) Trinity High School has been placed on lockdown. Dismissal will be delayed, Euless Police Department is on site to investigate possible trespassers. More info: https://t.co/Je867Ahl5G

    1511342139K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.9x their median

    Fort Worth FD is working a semi truck on fire, northbound I35W just before North Loop 820. Thanks to Abedah R. for the photo. https://t.co/owB8TL4obZ

    150151115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.4x their median

    At 8:12am, FWPD was dispatched to a person shooting in the school at Arlington Heights High School. Officers can confirm there was NO SHOOTING. They are investigating an incident that was originally reported as a shooting. More information will be released when provided by FWPD.

    125123038K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.3x their median

    Irving police say an intoxicated, wrong way driver hit a motorcyclist head-on along Highway 114. https://t.co/r91giKIA0H https://t.co/W42mm3GKfd

    107176122K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#rossfire

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 468K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.315% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 709 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is DFW Scanner's engagement rate on X?
DFW Scanner (@DFWscanner) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 468,412 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, DFW Scanner sits above the 10th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DFWscanner have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DFWscanner post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

DFW Scanner (@DFWscanner) Engagement Rate - 0.012% | PlayerSells