Danann engagement report
@DanannOficial - 477K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.305%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #debatelaotracara, #lindsayclancy.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #debatelaotracara, #lindsayclancy.
Compared with accounts its own size
Danann's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.305%, Danann sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 154.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 56K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 45K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 82K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 99K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 103K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 84K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 78K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 239K |
| Monday | 0% | 303K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 305K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 259K |
| Thursday | -2% | 251K |
| Friday | -3% | 260K |
| Saturday | +3% | 234K |
Best tweets
- Dec 12, 202537x their median
Y sí. https://t.co/VD9xI4khfw
- Aug 25, 20265.7x their median
Es literalmente un tipo pegándole a una mina, pero no es violencia de género porque vivimos en el siglo más retardado de la historia y tenemos que hacer de cuenta que ese negro gigante es una minita https://t.co/C3AwPf1rKc
- Aug 27, 20262.0x their median
La derecha no tiene artistas.
- Aug 26, 20261.9x their median
Es hora de prohibir a los hombres hablar sobre el aborto o el cuerpo de la mujer, en general.
- Aug 25, 20261.6x their median
Soy fan https://t.co/N6TdtBr4cA
- Aug 22, 2026
Che qué bien habla inglés EL ALCALDE DE BIRMINGHAM 😂😂😂👳🏾♂️💣 https://t.co/BXo9jN4UhR
- Aug 27, 2026
Quienes creemos en las banderas que enarbolamos preferimos el procesamiento y la condena antes que arrodillarnos ante la agenda que Judas prometió combatir. https://t.co/GyRHwAhk5z
- Aug 21, 2026
#DebateLaOtraCara | "Aquí no estamos hablando de la prevención de abuso sexual, nada tiene que ver con eso. Pero lo que hemos encontrado en Colombia: en muchos colegios le dicen a un niño que una niña puede tener pene y un niño puede tener vagina" @silvajonathan01 https://t.co/YQIhvGSsNI
- Aug 27, 2026
Team masterclass o team mierda humana?
- Aug 21, 2026
Trivia: ¿qué tienen en común la Inquisición, el Holocausto y los gulags? 1. El Islam 2. Argentina 3. Los chinos 4. Occidente
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.305%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #debatelaotracara, #lindsayclancy.
- What is Danann's engagement rate on X?
- Danann (@DanannOficial) has an engagement rate of 0.305%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 477,163 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.305%, Danann sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DanannOficial have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DanannOficial post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.