Back to @Dc_da_depressao's profile

DC da Depressão engagement report

@Dc_da_depressao - 417K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.227%
of 417K followers
Per impression
5.84%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
945
interactions (median)
Saved
0.173%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 945 interactions against 417K followers, an engagement rate of 0.227%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 5.84% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #lanterns.

Compared with accounts its own size

DC da Depressão's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.227%, DC da Depressão sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.438%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202611x their median

    Quando estou em uma competição de quem pega mulher casada e esses dois são meus oponentes: https://t.co/tCkM6LPaxZ

    9.6K5442423140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.0x their median

    O olho dele BRILHANDO quando ela fala que o casamento não é tranquilo KKKKKK https://t.co/rrHSJ3k4ru

    5.3K275134473K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.9x their median

    "Superman é filme de equipe" "O Batman não sabe espanhol" "A Mulher Maravilha não tem inimigos porque ela mata eles" https://t.co/CIUV1BNCLc

    4.4K22011389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.5x their median

    Mãe... posso dormir com você? Eu tô com medo do Bane https://t.co/xDaOvEsd7u

    3.1K184231743K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.2x their median

    Adria Arjona conta que NÃO pode revelar quem está interpretando em Homem do Amanhã: "Estou com músculos que nunca tive a minha vida inteira" https://t.co/jzTn0it3nd

    2.8K685686100K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.8x their median

    Ninguém: Absolutamente Ninguém: Hal Jordan e John Stewart: https://t.co/hGYxe3lfQI

    2.4K1916119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.6x their median

    Acabei de ver o vídeo vazado do jogo do Homem de Ferro.... Eu não quero ouvir NUNCA MAIS que um jogo do Superman é impossível https://t.co/CSweHoiOTy

    2.4K7020540K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.4x their median

    🚨ACABOU Gal Gadot confirma que NÃO IRÁ retornar como a Mulher Maravilha e que não tem mais notícias sobre James Gunn e a DC Studios. https://t.co/gYzMPh1z4D

    1.9K679317962K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.3x their median

    Tim Drake não é um dos Robins mais inteligentes a toa! https://t.co/UCeEoWmR2x

    2.1K102151241K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    Eu quando em apenas 2 episódios faço mais pela reputação dos Lanternas Verdes que o filme do Ryan Reynolds https://t.co/tCkM6LPaxZ

    2.1K11912825K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lanterns

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 945 interactions against 417K followers, an engagement rate of 0.227%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 5.84% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is DC da Depressão's engagement rate on X?
DC da Depressão (@Dc_da_depressao) has an engagement rate of 0.227%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 416,720 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.227%, DC da Depressão sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Dc_da_depressao have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Dc_da_depressao post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

DC da Depressão (@Dc_da_depressao) Engagement Rate - 0.227% | PlayerSells