Back to @DefiyantlyFree's profile

Insurrection Barbie engagement report

@DefiyantlyFree - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
1.69%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
2.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
426
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.43/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 426 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 1.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Insurrection Barbie's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Insurrection Barbie sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202654x their median

    Looks like I’m debating Alan Dershowitz on the Iran war tomorrow night. Let’s go!

    21K1.0K93755455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202624x their median

    Spencer Pratt goes scorched earth on Candace Owens and the “mommy sleuth TikTok” audience she captivates for their lies and insane conspiracies regarding the Charlie Kirk assassination. This is just absolutely incredible. Watch every second of it. https://t.co/dn2SnrPlrv

    8.0K1.7K374130369K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202617x their median

    As a Christian, your job is to bring people to the cross. It’s not about denominations. It’s about Christ.

    6.3K5202013458K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20269.2x their median

    https://t.co/wWqz8qt6Zj

    3.5K359691835K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.2x their median

    “The big mistake that people make is still thinking that the Jews are the chosen people.” Fr Ripperger https://t.co/Dli6YV6Val

    2.8K578853994K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.1x their median

    Nothing stands between you and a relationship with Christ. Not a church, pastor, priest, king, monarch, government official. Nothing. “And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice and yielded up his spirit. And behold, the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. And the earth shook, and the rocks were split.” Matthew 27:50–51 (ESV)

    2.3K26054525K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20265.6x their median

    For the last year, I’ve disappeared down a rabbit hole that has completely changed how I understand America. Like many of you, I watched strange alliances form seemingly overnight. Movements on the right and the left, people who otherwise despise one another, began arriving at many of the same conclusions. Christians turned on Christians. Institutions I had trusted seemed to change almost overnight. Israel became the flashpoint for almost everything. None of it made sense. Until one day, I realized I was asking the wrong question. This isn’t about Israel. The deeper battle is over something most Americans may have forgotten. What is America? That question consumed me. It led me through Scripture, covenant theology, the Protestant Reformation, the American founding, political philosophy, and history. I came to see the American founding as resting on two covenants. The first is the Declaration of Independence. It is our covenant of promise. It declares that our rights are not gifts from kings, legislatures, courts, or majorities. They come from our Creator. They exist before government exists. Government does not create them. It recognizes them. The second is the Constitution. It is our covenant of law. It establishes the limits of civil government, restrains power, and creates a political order capable of protecting liberty without becoming the source of liberty. Together, they answer one of the oldest questions in history. Who sits on the throne? Every civilization answers that question. Some place an emperor there. Some place a party there. Some place a church there. Some place the state there. Some place the common good there. America did something different. America placed God above the throne. That is why no court, no majority, and no church possesses ultimate authority over the human conscience. Government has real authority, but it is delegated authority. It is not ultimate authority. The state governs laws. The state governs courts. The state governs taxes. But the human soul belongs to God. I have become convinced that this is America’s greatest inheritance. It is also the inheritance many of us have forgotten. We don’t need to be more Christian we already are one. If we do not understand what made America different, how can we possibly defend it? That is why I wrote The Covenant Versus the Common Good: The Battle for the Soul of America. This is not another book about the culture war. It is an attempt to uncover the foundation beneath it. It argues that the battle over Israel is not the disease but the symptom. It examines why Israel has so often become the focal point of attacks throughout history while asking what lies beneath those attacks. It explores why movements on both the American right and the American left, despite profoundly disagreeing with one another, are increasingly converging on the same destination. Some pursue that destination intentionally. Others pursue it with the very best of intentions. But history teaches the same lesson over and over again. Whenever man occupies the place that belongs to God, freedom gives way to power. Not necessarily because men are evil, but because every one of us falls short of the glory of God. This book is my attempt to document that pattern carefully, honestly, and with evidence rather than speculation. More than anything, it is an attempt to recover an inheritance that I believe is worth preserving for our children and grandchildren. The Covenant Versus the Common Good: The Battle for the Soul of America will be released on December 4, 2026. Between now and then, I’ll be sharing research, draft chapters, and the historical journey that led me here to those who have subscribed. Because I have become convinced of one thing. If we don’t understand what we’re fighting to protect, we will lose it. Not because our opponents were stronger, but because we forgot what made it worth defending in the first place.

    1.7K5421643797K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.3x their median

    “The Vatican wants a one-world religion!” Well, yes, thank you for finally paying attention.

    2.1K70611039K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.3x their median

    A Christian Zionist is a Christian who has read and understands the book of Romans and believes Israel had a right to exist. Saying you aren’t one is not the flex you think it is lol.

    1.8K1802911532K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.6x their median

    If you want to defeat the DSA, start holding them to their own standards. Take their most radical statements. Read them out loud and make them defend them. Then make them defend their position about how they will make life more affordable for Americans. How do your policies lower costs. How will we pay for Medicare for all. How will we tax people. But if you’re one of those people on TV, you need to actually deeply understand their economic policies and you need to understand what their implications will be. Continuing to give them airtime where you generally argue back-and-forth and they come across like the every man instead of Maoists is worse then giving them zero air time at all. For some reason, the people interviewing them are not holding them to their own standards. And they should.

    1.7K28317627K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 426 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 1.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is Insurrection Barbie's engagement rate on X?
Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 70 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,016,690 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Insurrection Barbie sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DefiyantlyFree have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DefiyantlyFree post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going