Back to @DesignObserver's profile

DesignObserver engagement report

@DesignObserver - 742K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 742K followers
Per impression
0.144%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 742K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.144% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17 interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

DesignObserver's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, DesignObserver sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20264.3x their median

    How can we imagine a better city? This is the question at the center of Utopian Hours, the international city-making festival which returns to Turin on October 16-17. It will encourage participants to think about cities as collective projects that can still be reinvented: “housing is unaffordable, public space is contested, extreme heat is intensifying, social isolation is increasing and political divisions are shaping decisions about who gets to live where.” https://t.co/y4MucD6VUc

    413003.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.3x their median

    The great works of Vermeer and Rembrandt are now available to all. During the COVID-19 lockdown, the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam promised to digitize its collection to better “bring the museum to you. The extensive digital collection contains 840,000 works of art, free to download, share, and edit. https://t.co/Di6NMJsH6J

    125002.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.0x their median

    The ‘Hunger Games’ for art dealing? The BBC has launched an art dealing competition series featuring 14 hapless art world novices, aiming to offer “a fresh insight into how art is discovered, bought, and sold.” The Big Deal with Steph McGovern debuted in August. “This sounds super gross!” says artgrl321a on Instagram. “Thanks for making the artists feel even more like a commodity and less like a human being.” https://t.co/yY9Hxun66F

    39004.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.5x their median

    Thrift stores for creativity? Creative “reuse centers” offer communities a chance to pick up gently used or abandoned craft supplies and materials, which get them into the hands of thrifty dabblers and keep them out of landfills. “Reducing waste is the first benefit. But also, you can be more creative when you’re in a large warehouse and looking at things that you could not source yourself,” says Julian Silverman, a materials scientist at FIT. https://t.co/Hkxp36aHOJ

    55002.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.5x their median

    Customer experience quality in the U.S. fell to a new low in 2025. Fourth consecutive year of decline. The companies bucking that trend started at the top. Kate Watts on what it actually looks like to treat the customer experience as something worth designing. https://t.co/OMXSl1HzEN

    010001.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.3x their median

    Every web page must feel like home. “I don’t mean that every page should imitate the Home Page,” says Sue Vervaet. “I mean every page must be capable of welcoming a stranger.” https://t.co/phQsCXEOS7

    45003.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.8x their median

    A phrase from Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant has become a bit of a meme of late; the problem is, he likely never said: “The intelligence of a person is measured by the amount of uncertainty they can bear.” He did introduce other cool ideas, like duty-based ethics, which posits that ethical standards need to apply to everyone. “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” https://t.co/In1Hd2pYM2

    25006.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.8x their median

    Ice cream seems to be the one thing we can all agree on. Ice cream shops around the world are almost comically similar and universally recognizable wherever they appear. “This consistency appears to persist regardless of climate, culture, or context, signifying that the common threads of design are connected by experience and indulgence,” writes Olivia Poston. https://t.co/zzqmfNBK96

    43003.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.8x their median

    A beloved pop star married a champion football player. The big winner? Jonathan Anderson, creative director of the Parisian fashion house Christian Dior. The biggest bridal commission of the decade would have been “eager to prove himself just a year into his role leading the French luxury house,” says Reuters. https://t.co/UuxUrSeuBG

    06101.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.5x their median

    Inside Finland’s quest to end homelessness. A lot went right with the “Housing First” policy, which cut the number of unhoused by more than half since 2008, reports Miranda Bryant for the Guardian. The model, which treats housing as a fundamental human right rather than a reward, builds social support, safety, and community into its projects. But as the number of unhoused has started to creep up, researchers are asking important questions about what might come next. https://t.co/d7TmgPJJPD

    33004.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 742K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.144% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17 interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

What is DesignObserver's engagement rate on X?
DesignObserver (@DesignObserver) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 742,257 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, DesignObserver sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DesignObserver have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DesignObserver post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going