Back to @DoctorChrisVT's profile

Chris van Tulleken πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ engagement report

@DoctorChrisVT - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.011%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.311%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
3.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
126
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.311% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 255 interactions, about 2.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breakingground, #drc, #ebola. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #breakingground, #drc, #ebola.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Chris van Tulleken πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    "At the show were also seven wholesalers selling chocolate bars, crisps, and sweets, one of which had a display stand full of bags of Walkers crisps, Lucozade, Mars bars, and Kit Kats, with a sign saying β€œPlease help yourself.” Five ice cream firms were present, four soft drinks companies, and other suppliers that make items including pizzas and cake mixes and confectionery vending machines." Incredible investigation of the UK’s biggest school food show by @bmj_latest with @BiteBack2030 - unhealthy food is very much on the menu for kids. https://t.co/s3sI0EcJHy @BiteBack2030

    194526342K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.8x their median

    BMJ is corrupt. Retracts the Mostert paper in violation of COPE guidelines. So you should put your trust what has been REMOVED from the journals, not what is in the journals.

    1635012418K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    β€œ For decades food companies have employed scientists to work out how to keep you eating without stopping long enough to remember you have a body... …By contrast, the selling point of Magnum’s new ice-creams seems to be they will keep you laser-focused on your own body.” A magnificent piece on ice cream in today’s @guardian by @kitty__drake - one of the best food articles I’ve read. https://t.co/gw7lclxfFH

    135236386K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026

    I went for a full body MOT and the results came as a shock https://t.co/CruKm87LVe

    1036107213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    "It will turbocharge inequality; it is already facilitating a breathtaking shift of power and wealth from the hands of the many to the hands of a tiny number of men who – to put it in terms for which I can’t be sued – seem to hold dangerously damaged views about the value and dignity of human life." Much needed piece by author and academic Katherine Rundell in the @Guardian on the effect of AI on kids. Do we need for the sort of approaches we are seeing with social media and other online harms? https://t.co/Ik1LmRJz78

    64161041K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    I am working on an article about putting yourself out there as a writer or editor. Have you sought after something that felt unreachable? If so, I'd love to chat.

    122517.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Insightful interview with Jim Krieger on the operational definition of UPFs, providing an excellent fit for US policy purposes. https://t.co/BMbnAnAHIS

    740210K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breakingground#drc#ebola#healthforall

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.311% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 255 interactions, about 2.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breakingground, #drc, #ebola. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chris van Tulleken πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ's engagement rate on X?
Chris van Tulleken πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ (@DoctorChrisVT) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,115,861 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Chris van Tulleken πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DoctorChrisVT have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @DoctorChrisVT post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going