Dr. BioBlogo engagement report
@DrBioblogo - 66K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 584 interactions against 66K followers, an engagement rate of 0.88%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.0K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #flora, #aamm, #agentesmedioambientales.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #flora, #aamm, #agentesmedioambientales.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr. BioBlogo's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.88%, Dr. BioBlogo sits above the 75th percentile of the 218,597 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.705% to 2.63%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 259 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 8, 202615x their median
A wild crow figured out how to open a faucet on its own, drank until it had enough, let the water cool its feathers in the heat... and then calmly shut it back off before flying away. No training. No treats. Just a bird that was paying attention. Nature doesn't need an audience to be smart.
- Sep 15, 20264.5x their median
🆕🦕 I’m excited to finally share our new research, revealing the presence of the iconic dinosaur Diplodocus in Europe for the first time. The specimen was found in El Castellar (Teruel, Spain), dating to the Late Jurassic. Article available at: https://t.co/UwV88hkQ06 https://t.co/mh7loACP4f
- Sep 3, 20263.4x their median
A Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) in the net 💔 Most animals caught as #bycatch die after their release👺 The Greenland shark is regarded as ‘vulnerable’ by the IUCN They can live up to hundreds of years old but most of them don’t. I consider all life on our planet as ‘vulnerable’. #LiveVegan save lives and life on our planet 🙏 📍 #Greenland
- Mar 26, 20183.2x their median
Dejo aquí un índice de los hilos que he ido escribiendo. Por tenerlo ordenado y por si, remotamente, a alguien le resultaran interesantes 😜😜 (Aviso, casi todos relacionados con temas de Biología). Va: ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️▶️🐝🦓🐢🦎🦑🦈🦏🍄🌻🌲◀️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/mCdCHKQgSs
- Sep 9, 20261.5x their median
Se ha explicado muchas veces: los videos de aves con el pico "clavado" en un tronco o atascadas en las maderas de una valla... están preparados. Capturan aves para grabar videos virales y monetizar. Es maltrato. Si compartes ese tipo de contenido, ellos volverán a maltratar aves https://t.co/5zjtZOB5pn
- Sep 5, 2026
Lindíssimas vistas do lobo-ibérico a tentar caçar um javali, algures no P. N. da Peneda-Gerês, na Reserva da Biosfera Transfronteiriça Gerês-Xurés. Fotografia de Carlos Pontes. O javali afinal conseguiu fugir, mas emagreceu pelo menos 3 kg! @ascel @pablopv_1972 @perbaxo https://t.co/Kt4XQKA73H
- Sep 5, 2026
¿Pero qué cojones es esto? Si por el paisaje parece La Vuelta a Marruecos y hay menos gente ahí que en una Iglesia por la noche. https://t.co/1BnhNxEAmt
- Sep 6, 2026
En 🇪🇸, @GobAsturias quiere matar 67 de sus 412 a 460 lobos. Un 15% de la población... según SUS NÚMEROS: 8 o 9 lobos x 50 manadas ¡Pero ese nº incluye crías, que ya sufren elevada mortalidad! Un estudio detallado dice que en invierno sólo quedan 3-6 lobos por manada Sinsentido🤦 https://t.co/q0eNoHyqz3
- Sep 12, 2026
1/9 No son ataques En este estudio se reúnen evidencias de que las orcas ibéricas no están atacando agresivamente a las embarcaciones, es algo mucho más complejo y más cercano a una tradición cultural de juego. (paper) DOI 10.1111/mms.70247 https://t.co/oKTpHZ8jW2
- Sep 9, 2026
🐅 En #Toledo, #AgentesMedioambientales de @gobjccm localizan un #LinceIbérico muerto en un cepo y otro ejemplar con una pata amputada. ⚠️ Los cepos están prohibidos y pueden constituir delito contra la fauna. ⚖️Atestado remitido al Juzgado. Continúa la investigación. #AAMM https://t.co/gOtDViefx5
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 584 interactions against 66K followers, an engagement rate of 0.88%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.0K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #flora, #aamm, #agentesmedioambientales.
- What is Dr. BioBlogo's engagement rate on X?
- Dr. BioBlogo (@DrBioblogo) has an engagement rate of 0.88%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 66,190 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.88%, Dr. BioBlogo sits above the 75th percentile of the 218,597 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DrBioblogo have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DrBioblogo post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.