Back to @DrLoupis's profile

Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis engagement report

@DrLoupis - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.17%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
1.57%
146K views on a typical post
Reach
10.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.22%
320 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.17%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 146K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 199K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.17%, Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 202656x their median

    He means what he says

    161K31K5.6K8428.9M viewsView on X
  • May 7, 202621x their median

    We know! https://t.co/vYzwgJ6JjM

    57K18K606349743K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 202523x their median

    The UK has fallen. https://t.co/F2DFE62hme

    45K5.6K2.5K3593.2M viewsView on X
  • May 7, 202614x their median

    This is who they gave the so-called Epstein files to. It's all a fucking joke! https://t.co/tIbQHRc7nj

    43K7.3K27447544K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202613x their median

    Amanda Ungaro, ex-girlfriend of Paolo Zampolli and mother of his son, claims that Paolo Zampolli did NOT introduce Melania to Donald Trump. Jeffrey Epstein did: “She (Melania) was an escort of Jeffrey Epstein. That’s how she met Donald Trump" https://t.co/N8VtudcIZ1

    31K11K7103041.5M viewsView on X
  • May 8, 20266.7x their median

    Katie Johnson sued Trump for raping her when she was 13yo at Jeffrey Epstein’s NY home, but was forced to drop the case after receiving multiple death threats Her sworn court testimony was public record. Trump didn't sue her for defamation https://t.co/qqzPrBZ6C5

    17K6.7K381166335K viewsView on X
  • Dec 29, 202510.0x their median

    Exactly one year ago today, @elonmusk removed my checkmark, my paying subscribers, my prepaid @premium features (paid for 1 year), and my entire reach because of an arguement over the H-1B visas. My account had 1.4M followers at that time. I didn't break any terms of service! Elon never returned my checkmark, @X never gave me any explanation nor did they give me my money from Premium+ back. The crime? Discussing Indian visas. I'm a Medical Doctor discussing politics. I never broke any laws. If @elonmusk really believes in free speech, he should make up for the mistakes he has made along the way like shutting down his own paying customers. I had to make a brand new account and start all over from scratch. So I made @DrLoupis__ (be sure to follow both). This shouldn't be happening on a free speech platform. Elon, it's not too late to give the checkmark back and restore some trust in you, and your concept of free speech.

    18K3.1K1.0K2641.1M viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20264.9x their median

    The Holodomor was a GENOCIDE committed by Jewish Bolsheviks. This madman was in charge of the genocide. His name is Genrikh Yagoda. He was Jewish. To those ignorant people claiming Holodomor wasn't perpetrated by Jews. They are 5% correct and 95% wrong. 95% of Bolshevik leaders were Jewish. 92% of the Gulag commanders were Jewish. 50% of the NKVD Generals were Jewish. The massmurder of at least 60 million white orthodox Christians and Muslims in USSR was committed by a 95% Jewish government. The Bolsheviks killed 60 million people and you never once heard about that in school!

    11K5.1K595291325K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 20264.7x their median

    Andrew Tate on Piers Morgan: "You told me that Israel isn’t committing a genocide and you were wrong!" "You told me the vaccines were important and you were wrong!" "Your whole life, you've been wrong" 🤣 https://t.co/cvE80M1LIB

    14K2.4K16332485K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20266.9x their median

    Do you agree with Mel Gibson? 🔥 https://t.co/aF34GGovhX

    12K2.9K40884119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.17%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 146K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 199K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis (@DrLoupis) has an engagement rate of 0.17%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,344,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.17%, Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DrLoupis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DrLoupis post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going