Dr. Phil engagement report
@DrPhil - 1.6M followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.528% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 80x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr. Phil's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.012%, Dr. Phil sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jun 16, 202680x their median
Japanese fans cleaned the WHOLE stadium after Japan tied the Netherlands. Hours later, NYC Knicks fans torched buses celebrating their first NBA title since 1973. Same win, opposite character. Save this and share it with someone who needs to see the contrast. https://t.co/MbDx5C9BVU
- Jul 10, 202653x their median
Our government has known for 79 years. And they told us nothing. Objects moving in ways nothing we build can... Circling the one place on Earth we'd never want them. This should bother you. https://t.co/Yzd8RFxTj6
- Jul 10, 202643x their median
You're hearing this from me first. I was granted early access to newly released UAP documents, and one pattern jumps off the page: these objects have been showing up over our nuclear facilities for 77 years. Here's the record: • 1949, Los Alamos: After multiple "green fireball" sightings near nuclear facilities, the military convened a scientific conference to determine if they were meteors. Dr. Lincoln LaPaz, the foremost expert, said no. They flew horizontally, silently, at constant velocity. The conference's greatest concern: they appeared most frequently over nuclear sites nationwide. • 2015, Amarillo, Texas: A UAP violated the sealed airspace over Pantex, the heavily guarded plant where America assembles and disassembles nuclear weapons. Seen by multiple personnel. The release also includes: • Project SIGN's 1948 progress report, the Air Force's first formal UFO investigation, launched after Kenneth Arnold's famous 1947 sighting and Roswell eleven days later. Hundreds of cases studied. Rapid climbs, hovering, abrupt reversals, saucer-shaped craft. • A 1948 Air Intelligence Study acknowledging at least 210 unexplainable reports. • Hours of Apollo 17 crew debriefs on firework-like particles observed during their mission. • FBI and CIA witness interview reports focused on national security concerns. This isn't speculation. It's the government's own documentation, and you're seeing it here first. The nuclear pattern continues around the world today.
- Aug 13, 202641x their median
Her wedding dress was $100. She paid it off on layaway, five dollars a week. The ring was $315. I see people spend millions on a wedding and it lasts a year. We spent less than $500 and it's stuck for 50 years. Pretty good return on investment. Read the full article here: https://t.co/Q6mnDGAaPO
- Jul 15, 202628x their median
The government's most successful deception wasn't convincing you UFOs don't exist. It was convincing you that EVEN asking about them makes you a fool. That's not an accident. It's a psyop, and it's been running for decades. I break it all down in my Daily Mail exclusive: https://t.co/r3UYI7JHlr
- Aug 7, 202625x their median
The Pentagon calls it disclosure. I call it a magic trick. Look over here... while nobody tells you what's really over there. If you want to talk about disclosure, then start disclosing. https://t.co/UT9Zp4V3Ih
- Jul 10, 202621x their median
You've been shown the drunks who "got abducted" You were never shown the others. Military pilots. Navy pilots. Research scientists. There's a reason for that. https://t.co/gpcJV8yG1j
- Jun 9, 202621x their median
“What's a kid doing at a track meet with a weapon? What's he doing there with a knife?" That was the first thing I asked when 17-year-old Austin Metcalf was stabbed to death at a high school track meet. Today, we got our answer. A jury found 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony guilty of murder.
- Aug 14, 202618x their median
I asked how many craft are here that aren't from this planet. More than 25. Under 100. Discs. Boomerangs. Tic Tacs. He says he's seen them. https://t.co/Jpa2q5zv6G
- Jun 8, 202615x their median
Netanyahu is suing The New York Times for libel — calling its article one of the worst blood libels in modern press. This breaks down what blood libel actually is, why the claim is historically false, and whether this is independent reporting or propaganda dressed up as a report. Be a critical thinker about what you read. Save this and share it with someone who follows the news.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.528% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 80x its own typical post.
- What is Dr. Phil's engagement rate on X?
- Dr. Phil (@DrPhil) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,597,335 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.012%, Dr. Phil sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DrPhil have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DrPhil post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.