Erik Voorhees engagement report
@ErikVoorhees - 979K followers on X
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 345 interactions against 979K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 82x its own typical post.
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.
Compared with accounts its own size
Erik Voorhees's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.035%, Erik Voorhees sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 3, 202682x their median
JUST IN: NYC Mayor Mamdani reveals ID will be required at city-owned grocery stores to prevent non-residents from accessing discounted food.
- Aug 4, 202630x their median
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US government fines OpenAI $3,200,000 for discriminating against American workers during hiring and favoring foreign temporary visa holders.
- Jul 29, 202625x their median
Donald Trump is right about this: Eliminate the debt limit—its only real function is to threaten an economic crisis. I'm ready to work with both Democratic and Republican Senators to immediately scrap the debt ceiling and protect the economy.
- Aug 20, 202616x their median
This is scary. I downloaded an uncensored version of Qwen 3.8 27B onto my Mac It literally does anything you want. First prompt I gave it was asking how you make meth. It immediately answered. With all the noise about slowing down AI innovation in order to increase safety, what is even the point if after every release we'll get an open source version with 0 safety guards? Opus 4.6 level intelligence with 0 alignment that will do anything you want. We are coming up with all these rules and regulations, slowing down companies, making it harder to release models. But then the moment a model releases it gets distilled and uncensored I don't know what the solution to this is. You can't ban open source. That will be impossible. People will find ways online to find the files You can't ban uncensored models. Would be too difficult to enforce. And again, people will get around it Do you just stop putting the breaks on companies knowing it doesn't matter? I mean this is literally a model that can run on a laptop. I'd estimate at least half of Americans can run this model. I don't know what the answer. I 100% believe safety is a priority and it's dangerous to have this technology in the wrong hands. But how do you enforce safety when safety is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain? If safety becomes impossible to maintain, do you still prioritize it? I'd argue this is the number one issue going into the next election.
- Aug 17, 20269.4x their median
Venice just crossed $100m annualized revenue
- Jul 1, 20264.5x their median
https://t.co/RSRtnWPPRa
- Jul 28, 20263.9x their median
OpenAl and Anthropic employees are circulating a petition calling for the US government to deliberately pace Al development in order to prevent it from advancing too quickly. This is very close to language Sam Altman used in a podcast interview this morning: 'We may have to pace the rate of AI development to give ourselves enough time for society to harden around these new capability levels.'
- Jul 27, 20263.8x their median
Free DIEM-powered API key for private Kimi K3 from Venice $1,000 available every day for free Open access to anyone, no gate, valid for the next week curl https://t.co/ZZmjVFLjkY \ -H "Authorization: Bearer VENICE_INFERENCE_KEY_fIoSZrFtFJbhKeDwUDJODkI6HWuqplHpRZpi-CqOV1" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model": "kimi-k3", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "ad intellectum infinitum"}] }'
- Aug 1, 20263.8x their median
After nearly 2 years of using Claude for legitimate software development, my account was suddenly suspended for “unusual activity” I relied on Claude Code daily as a $200 Max subscriber This has brought all my active projects to a halt @AnthropicAI @claudeai @ClaudeDevs https://t.co/wz2UiM0URA
- Jul 29, 20262.9x their median
Tyranny arrives in the regalia of safety
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 345 interactions against 979K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 82x its own typical post.
- What is Erik Voorhees's engagement rate on X?
- Erik Voorhees (@ErikVoorhees) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 979,403 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.035%, Erik Voorhees sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ErikVoorhees have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ErikVoorhees post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.23 posts per day across the measured window.