Sherri™ engagement report
@FFT1776 - 399K followers on X
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 426 interactions against 399K followers, an engagement rate of 0.107%. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 6.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.107%, Sherri™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 155.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 56K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 45K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 82K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 99K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 103K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 84K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 78K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 239K |
| Monday | 0% | 303K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 305K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 259K |
| Thursday | -2% | 251K |
| Friday | -3% | 260K |
| Saturday | +3% | 234K |
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 20264.7x their median
🚨 TREY GOWDY ASKED TRUMP ABOUT GETTING SHOT. “Has it changed how you look at life… or death?” Trump’s answer was ice cold. “I purposely don’t think about it. If I did, I wouldn’t be here.” Then he said this: He’s the only consequential president who’s been shot at. And instead of folding, he saved the country from the edge. America was going broke. Now it’s the hottest country on Earth. That’s not luck. That’s a man who refuses to flinch.
- Aug 31, 20261.8x their median
28 years later and the first thing anyone still thinks when they see Monica Lewinsky is Bill Clinton. A 49-year-old President and a 22-year-old intern. He lied under oath. She got destroyed. He walked. Democrats still treat him like a king. That’s the double standard. https://t.co/SYa2KwjTgz
- Aug 31, 2026
Where’s Mitch? And why is the entire Senate quiet about this? https://t.co/EkL7GYkBFG
- Aug 31, 2026
Every Senator, Dem & GOP, SUCK! They can’t even decide what time it is. The Sunshine Protection Act has been sitting in Senate committee since July 15. Americans are sick of springing forward and falling back. And this do-nothing Senate still hasn’t moved it. So on November 1, we change our clocks again … because grown adults in Washington can’t agree on what time it is. 🚨LOCK THE CLOCK. Or admit this Senate can’t pass anything that isn’t a press release. End the circus.🤡
- Aug 31, 2026
JUST IN: John Cornyn tells CNN he won’t campaign with Ken Paxton in the Texas Senate race 49% chance Paxton wins https://t.co/AwojEWxPly
- Aug 31, 2026
Many years ago (maybe 5 ish), private conversations were allegedly recorded without my knowledge or consent. If multiple calls were recorded during that period, that raises an even bigger question: How many conversations were being saved and why? Now, 5 years later, some of those private conversations have allegedly been played for other people. And when that happens in the middle of efforts to damage someone’s reputation, throttle their social-media presence or interfere with the income they earn from that platform, I believe the financial impact matters too. This is bigger than one recorded phone call. And for me, it has become a matter of principle. But there’s another part of this that people need to think about. Why would someone secretly record a person they claimed was their friend? Imagine going through a difficult time. Someone presents themselves as the supportive friend. You confide in them. You tell them things you would never say publicly because you believe you’re having a private conversation. Meanwhile, they may be creating a library of your most vulnerable moments. That information can later become leverage and a way to embarrass, intimidate, control, retaliate against or publicly destroy someone. I’ve watched another version of this happen out here too. Someone I know has a criminal history. One of his supposed “friends” researched that history and then spread what she found across the platform. Whatever someone’s past may be, pretending to be their friend while collecting information that can later be weaponized against them is something I find deeply disturbing. This is why I’m considering fighting this on principle. I’m looking for an attorney willing to seriously examine what happened, what laws may apply, what remedies exist and what responsibility, if any, the platform has when private material is allegedly weaponized through its services. If there are attorneys out here who handle privacy, unlawful recording, cyber-harassment, defamation or social-media/platform litigation or if you know an attorney you would recommend, please reach out to me. I’m looking for someone willing to take a serious look at this and determine how far it can and should be pursued. I’m considering starting a GiveSendGo to help fund that fight. I don’t believe this is only happening to me. If people can secretly collect private conversations, hold them for years and later use them as ammunition in online campaigns intended to destroy reputations or livelihoods, there needs to be a meaningful avenue for victims to address it. And right now, I don’t see an adequate avenue through X. If the right legal team comes together, I don’t want to look only at the individuals involved in my situation. I want to examine the bigger issue including what responsibility platforms have when their tools are allegedly being used to facilitate this kind of conduct. And once we have legal counsel and know how to properly collect information, I would welcome hearing from other people who believe they’ve experienced something similar. Not internet revenge. Not a pile-on. Accountability. Due process. And a serious look at where the legal boundaries actually are. Someone needs to address this. I’m willing to try.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 426 interactions against 399K followers, an engagement rate of 0.107%. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 6.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Sherri™'s engagement rate on X?
- Sherri™ (@FFT1776) has an engagement rate of 0.107%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 399,234 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.107%, Sherri™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FFT1776 have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @FFT1776 post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.