Back to @FactFiinder's profile

Fact Finder engagement report

@FactFiinder - 89K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 89K followers
Per impression
0%
457 views on a typical post
Reach
0.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 457 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.511% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 204 interactions.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fact Finder's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Fact Finder sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Feb 17, 2026

    🚨 OCCRP rehashes debunked 2023 claims — pure recycled propaganda This is NOT new. It’s the same old Hindenburg 2.0 narrative about two long-time legitimate global investors (UAE’s Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli & Taiwan’s Chang Chung-Ling), who were business associates of Adani Group with past director roles in affiliated entities. They invested ~$3 billion in listed Adani stocks through fully regulated hedge funds in 2023. 📌 Important context on regulatory findings, disclosures, and funding sources Indian law does not require listed companies to track/disclose sources of funds for public shareholders beyond mandatory rules; listed firms have no control over independent trades or visibility into such investments. Adani spokesperson: "Any suggestion that promoter shareholding has been misstated or concealed is incorrect." (From OCCRP article itself) SEBI investigated core Hindenburg allegations (incl. related-party/manipulation claims involving similar entities/transactions). In Sept 2025 final orders on two flagged sets: allegations "not established," no violations found (transactions not related-party under then-applicable rules; no manipulation). Stocks rose post-orders. - SEBI order (Adicorp): https://t.co/8KtQsBOL0u - SEBI order (Milestone/Rehvar): https://t.co/tNpxDtZ3nQ - Reuters (Sep 19, 2025): SEBI dismissed manipulation claims, no breaches; stocks climbed. https://t.co/1xzOEKQO4J Supreme Court (Jan 2024) upheld SEBI's probe, noting confidence in process; rejected transfer requests. Swiss probe into Chang (money laundering/forgery suspicions, assets frozen ~$311M) ongoing since 2021; no charges as of report (Aug 2024 court ruling rejected unfreeze appeal). Adani denies involvement. US cases (2024 indictment/SEC complaint on bribery) ongoing; Adani calls baseless. OCCRP receives significant funding from US government (USAID/State Dept, historically ~50% of budget pre-2025) and Open Society Foundations (George Soros). Critics, including India's ruling BJP, accuse it of pushing anti-India narratives targeting PM Modi and Adani Group (e.g., via reports amplified by opposition). OCCRP states donors have no editorial control. - Mediapart (Dec 2024): https://t.co/HO8iQtZfIt - OCCRP funding: https://t.co/vsiWFLr7Lx - Reuters/The Hindu (Dec 2024): https://t.co/Kfwe9kCoQv Report recycles prior elements (e.g., ties from dismissed 2007/2014 DRI cases). Adani maintains full compliance; investments by public shareholders via regulated funds. Adds regulatory outcomes, legal status, Indian disclosure rules, and funding context for balanced view.

    10198501.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    💔 https://t.co/CuKZ6BwJDl

    3100826 viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    🚨 India's profile has grown globally. With 40 countries we are having Free Trade agreement (FTA) now: PM Modi from Red fort. https://t.co/Tulm33zK2V

    3000456 viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Putin meets EAM Jaishankar 🔥 https://t.co/3FM56PfAIb

    1100324 viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    🚨 All vehicles to be fitted with V2V communication system from October 1, 2028 https://t.co/imdgdsxCCD

    0020456 viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    🚨 China is in illegal occupation of Indian territories in J&K, says MEA Spox https://t.co/nSFz0gIRlZ

    1100424 viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    🇮🇳 https://t.co/4GuYBMxl5X

    1000467 viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    🇮🇳 https://t.co/JJ8nAfhZ5t

    1000556 viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    🇮🇳 https://t.co/Vmh7ezong4

    1000583 viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    🚨 Mumbai to get 238 Vande Metro AC locals, first train in 2027 and full fleet by 2030: Railway minister https://t.co/qRTodc2ELR

    1000569 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 457 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.511% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 204 interactions.

What is Fact Finder's engagement rate on X?
Fact Finder (@FactFiinder) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,396 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Fact Finder sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FactFiinder have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FactFiinder post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going